You can go ahead and rename it that. Past due, actually.Originally posted by Nat Algren:
If either wins, it should be re-named the Orwell Peace Prize.
My God......I hope this was typed while laughing.Originally posted by naturalmwa:
I'd say Obama just earned the one they already gave him. Give this one to Kerry and launch his 2016 campaign.
The key is that they won't be able to enrich enough for weapons. Not anywhere close to enough for weapons. Enrichment in the 5-20% range is generally described as good for medical applications and scientific research. IIRC, you need levels above 90% for bombs. Probably well above 90% but I'm too lazy to look it up.Originally posted by gusto79:
I'm sure I could find this online if I wanted to look, but what is the purpose of enriching uranium besides nuclear weapons? I see the deal still lets Iran enrich uranium, just not as much.
You are living in a dream world. I truly believe the only time you will believe Iran is developing nuclear bombs is when one is dropped on Israel and the Iranians admit to doing it.Originally posted by What Would Jesus Do?:
The key is that they won't be able to enrich enough for weapons. Not anywhere close to enough for weapons. Enrichment in the 5-20% range is generally described as good for medical applications and scientific research. IIRC, you need levels above 90% for bombs. Probably well above 90% but I'm too lazy to look it up.Originally posted by gusto79:
I'm sure I could find this online if I wanted to look, but what is the purpose of enriching uranium besides nuclear weapons? I see the deal still lets Iran enrich uranium, just not as much.
Which reminds me, is the TV show Manhattan coming back? That was one of the problems they ran into back then - even at very high levels of enrichment, the bomb could either fail or behave unpredictably (and perhaps disastrously) - failure being most likely.
Originally posted by cndyman:
My God......I hope this was typed while laughing.Originally posted by naturalmwa:
I'd say Obama just earned the one they already gave him. Give this one to Kerry and launch his 2016 campaign.
While the WWIII term might be a bit hyperbolic, there is little doubt in my mind that decades of fighting that would make the Iraq war look small is the alternative to this agreement. It's dispointing that you miss that context.Originally posted by Noble Hawk:
Please explain in detail how he stopped world war 3. The Kerry SOFA comment is so ridiculous that we can just leave that alone.
Seriously natural, if you are trolling in this thread, I say bravo. You got me to bite. If not, that is disappointing.
Translation...your completely full of it.Originally posted by naturalmwa:
While the WWIII term might be a bit hyperbolic...Originally posted by Noble Hawk:
Please explain in detail how he stopped world war 3. The Kerry SOFA comment is so ridiculous that we can just leave that alone.
Seriously natural, if you are trolling in this thread, I say bravo. You got me to bite. If not, that is disappointing.
Sure, I had to give IMCC a demonstration.Originally posted by timinatoria:Translation...your completely full of it.Originally posted by naturalmwa:While the WWIII term might be a bit hyperbolic...Originally posted by Noble Hawk:
Please explain in detail how he stopped world war 3. The Kerry SOFA comment is so ridiculous that we can just leave that alone.
Seriously natural, if you are trolling in this thread, I say bravo. You got me to bite. If not, that is disappointing.
Unless the world gets its act together, Iran and a whole bunch of other nations (and corporations, and religions, and girl scout clubs) will have nukes.Originally posted by IMCC965:
You are living in a dream world. I truly believe the only time you will believe Iran is developing nuclear bombs is when one is dropped on Israel and the Iranians admit to doing it.Originally posted by What Would Jesus Do?:
The key is that they won't be able to enrich enough for weapons. Not anywhere close to enough for weapons. Enrichment in the 5-20% range is generally described as good for medical applications and scientific research. IIRC, you need levels above 90% for bombs. Probably well above 90% but I'm too lazy to look it up.Originally posted by gusto79:
I'm sure I could find this online if I wanted to look, but what is the purpose of enriching uranium besides nuclear weapons? I see the deal still lets Iran enrich uranium, just not as much.
Which reminds me, is the TV show Manhattan coming back? That was one of the problems they ran into back then - even at very high levels of enrichment, the bomb could either fail or behave unpredictably (and perhaps disastrously) - failure being most likely.
But at that point, all you will care about is how many Jews were killed and if Iran was going to drop more.
You really should go back to being Parser instead of WWJD because Jesus was Jewish and you'd like to see them all gone.