It's funny that Wisconsin posters have taken so long to finally deny/deflect/defend Davison and his antics.Sorry, I see no appearances that would lead me to conclude it was intentional.
Great stuff as usual.
It's funny that Wisconsin posters have taken so long to finally deny/deflect/defend Davison and his antics.Sorry, I see no appearances that would lead me to conclude it was intentional.
He's done the exact thing before and said right after the game that he supposes that he'll need to find another way to fight thru screens. He did exactly what he intended to do.Sorry, I see no appearances that would lead me to conclude it was intentional.
You must either be blind, an idiot, or just purposely obtuse then. There is no other conclusion one could come to, especially seeing the way Davison purposely bent down to sweep Wieskamp's feet out from under himself. Seems like Davison is getting worse, too. Is this what Gard teaches? And Gard defended Davison after the game. What an ass.Sorry, I see no appearances that would lead me to conclude it was intentional.
I was away and did not see this (and other) game. I saw the replay only recently.It's funny that Wisconsin posters have taken so long to finally deny/deflect/defend Davison and his antics.
Great stuff as usual.
Davison has intentionally used this maneuver as a way to pick up moving screen violations on defenders,.. The rap to the nuts might not be planned, but the odds of it happening are pretty high with a dirty move like this... Davison has a long history of playing in the margins of the rule book...
Neither planned nor intended. As is apparent, Brad is not a tall, fast or athletic guard at this level and has a difficult time getting around screens. He plays aggressive defense, no doubt. He sometimes plays out of control and needs to avoid putting himself in those situations. He apologized immediately in the two instances I am aware of.
Gard is selective as to the kids he recruits and is familiar with his high school and the conference they play in. He watched Brad since 8th grade and would not have offered him if he carried the reputaion of a dirty player.
Neither planned nor intended. As is apparent, Brad is not a tall, fast or athletic guard at this level and has a difficult time getting around screens. He plays aggressive defense, no doubt. He sometimes plays out of control and needs to avoid putting himself in those situations. He apologized immediately in the two instances I am aware of.
Gard is selective as to the kids he recruits and is familiar with his high school and the conference they play in. He watched Brad since 8th grade and would not have offered him if he carried the reputaion of a dirty player.
I don't know how this got to the point of you, that are normally Fran haters can come to a conclusion that he at the same level as Gard. He doesn't win as much, he certainly doesn't develop talent as well, He can't get his teams to play defense at a championship level. He is too volatile! If you lose 3 out of your next 4, I wonder how many will be calling for his head!
What advantages does Wisconsin have in this league that Iowa does not? Genuine questionThere’s a simple test and that would be if you flipped Fran and Gard at these schools, Fran would be every bit as successful if not more given all the advantages Wisconsin has in this league and your b-ball would be highly entertaining instead of a snooze fest that it is. Gard at Iowa would be a notch above Lickliter but consistently in the bottom 1/3 and out of a job in 3-4 years.
Look at the coaches that each replaced and the state of each program when they came in. No comparison there - Iowa was a dumpster fire and WI was the conference champs and national runner-up, with 17 straight NCAA appearances.I don't know how this got to the point of you, that are normally Fran haters can come to a conclusion that he at the same level as Gard. He doesn't win as much, he certainly doesn't develop talent as well, He can't get his teams to play defense at a championship level. He is too volatile! If you lose 3 out of your next 4, I wonder how many will be calling for his head!
What advantages does Wisconsin have in this league that Iowa does not? Genuine question
IA: Iowa, Iowa State, Northern Iowa, DrakeTwice the in-state population with half the number of Division 1 programs...
No excuses.I was away and did not see this (and other) game. I saw the replay only recently.
Lulz......he got suspended for a reason.Neither planned nor intended. As is apparent, Brad is not a tall, fast or athletic guard at this level and has a difficult time getting around screens. He plays aggressive defense, no doubt. He sometimes plays out of control and needs to avoid putting himself in those situations. He apologized immediately in the two instances I am aware of.
Gard is selective as to the kids he recruits and is familiar with his high school and the conference they play in. He watched Brad since 8th grade and would not have offered him if he carried the reputaion of a dirty player.
IA: Iowa, Iowa State, Northern Iowa, Drake
WI: Wisconsin, Marquette, UW-Milwaukee, UW-Green Bay
I believe that the states have the same number of Division 1 programs unless I am forgetting a team.
Wisconsin does have a larger in-state population, which could be an advantage in recruiting, but I would argue that it has a negligible impact at this point. Kids are leaving home more frequently than they ever have in basketball
Look at the coaches that each replaced and the state of each program when they came in. No comparison there - Iowa was a dumpster fire and WI was the conference champs and national runner-up, with 17 straight NCAA appearances.
And I would argue that UW-Milwaukee and UW-Green Bay are nothing more than feeder programs for UW-Madison,... just cogs in the machine.
I don't know how this got to the point of you, that are normally Fran haters can come to a conclusion that he at the same level as Gard. He doesn't win as much, he certainly doesn't develop talent as well, He can't get his teams to play defense at a championship level. He is too volatile! If you lose 3 out of your next 4, I wonder how many will be calling for his head!
Outside of Trevor Anderson, I am not aware of any players that have transferred from those schools to UW. Anderson is not even a scholarship player. Are there other examples I am unaware of?And I would argue that UW-Milwaukee and UW-Green Bay are nothing more than feeder programs for UW-Madison,... just cogs in the UW machine.
You are clueless.It's a helluva lot easier to replace Todd Lickliter than Bo Ryan. Anything Fran does, even the slightest success is overblown. GG will never live up to the hype (in idiot's perspectives)
Lulz......he got suspended for a reason.
Argue if you will but that is not accurate.And I would argue that UW-Milwaukee and UW-Green Bay are nothing more than feeder programs for UW-Madison,... just cogs in the UW machine.
Undercutting?.....You mean like sticking your foot out underneath someone intentionally so they land on your leg awkwardly and possibly roll their ankle or worse?........I wish the Commissioner was concerned about players undercutting other players, a much more dangerous foul and potentially career ending act than the "takedown" in question.
Outside of Trevor Anderson, I am not aware of any players that have transferred from those schools to UW. Anderson is not even a scholarship player. Are there other examples I am unaware of?
When is the last time Iowa lost a desirable recruit to Drake or Northern Iowa? Outside of AJ Green (whose dad is on staff and really shouldn't count), Iowa isn't losing anyone they want to those schools.Not about transfers, it's about a lack of recruiting competition,... When's the last time UW-Madison lost out on a desirable recruit to UW-Milwaukee or UW-Green Bay?,... doesn't happen, because UW funnels any serious in-state talent directly to Madison.
I don't particularly think Iowa fans have liked the conservative playcalling from our football team. Good thing is, that is in the past. Iowa plans to score 45+ moving forward.I won't argue any Iowa fan that would rather have Fran than Gard. I won't agree, but I do acknowledge that there are pieces there to be successful in the coming years.
It is a bit perplexing about how style of play is used in the argument though, especially from a fanbase that really seems to have no problem enjoying the style of play their football team employs.
As long as your team is winning, you're going to enjoy watching them play. In my opinion, it's just as frustrating watching your team score 55 as it is watching them give up 85. It's just as fun watching your team give up 50 as it is watching your team score 90.
Not about transfers, it's about a lack of recruiting competition,... When's the last time UW-Madison lost out on a desirable recruit to UW-Milwaukee or UW-Green Bay?,... doesn't happen, because UW funnels any serious in-state talent directly to Madison.
Rivalries make sports interesting and fun to me. As elaberate and intense as they can get, I don't despise anyone. The B1G has a large number of outstanding universities with excellent academics, clean athletic departments and good student athletes. Iowa and Wisconsin are two of these schools. Can't we have civil conversations?
I won't argue any Iowa fan that would rather have Fran than Gard. I won't agree, but I do acknowledge that there are pieces there to be successful in the coming years.
It is a bit perplexing about how style of play is used in the argument though, especially from a fanbase that really seems to have no problem enjoying the style of play their football team employs.
As long as your team is winning, you're going to enjoy watching them play. In my opinion, it's just as frustrating watching your team score 55 as it is watching them give up 85. It's just as fun watching your team give up 50 as it is watching your team score 90.
The “‘takedown’ in question” was the last straw in a culmination of dirty play, and the Big Ten decided it was finally time to do something about it.I wish the Commissioner was concerned about players undercutting other players, a much more dangerous foul and potentially career ending act than the "takedown" in question.
What advantages does Wisconsin have in this league that Iowa does not? Genuine question