No kidding. I think Garza may have missed his last 4. Finished 2-7 from the line. Ouch.OMG.. I hope it isn't won at the free throw line. We suck as of late.
I’m not sure how strong the correlation is on a national scale, but there certainly will be some correlation. In Wisconsin’s case I think it’s magnified due to the offensive skillsets on the team. There is not a strong ability to get to the rim. The majority of shots inside the arc in conference play (55% compared to 42% for Iowa) have been midrange shots, which are made at a clip 20% lower than shots near the rim. Essentially Wisconsin is more reliant on jump shooting to score than most teams, and coupled with consistent outputs defensively, you’ll see W/L record pretty strongly tied to the jump shooting numbersGreat content and thanks for sharing, especially how predictive shooting >33% is to winning , 10-1, although you still win ~50% of the time when shooting <33%. If you shoot over 33% you almost always win , when shooting under, its only 50/50.
im curious what the national average in this might be and if it’s not generally always true?
as a note, IOWA gives up 3Pt FG in BIG at a 35% rate, so unless Iowa decides to make it tougher on WI shooters by,moor example playing M2M, then it looks like whisky wins this by virtue of the 3Pt FG% predictive value.
This is what worries me. Iowa gets behind and can't recover, and Wisconsin suffocates Iowa in this case. Because Iowa can't defend well enough to get back in the game. Michigan could, but they have superior D against the 3.Their 3 point shooters looked great in the first half against Michigan...
I’m not sure how strong the correlation is on a national scale, but there certainly will be some correlation. In Wisconsin’s case I think it’s magnified due to the offensive skillsets on the team. There is not a strong ability to get to the rim. The majority of shots inside the arc in conference play (55% compared to 42% for Iowa) have been midrange shots, which are made at a clip 20% lower than shots near the rim. Essentially Wisconsin is more reliant on jump shooting to score than most teams, and coupled with consistent outputs defensively, you’ll see W/L record pretty strongly tied to the jump shooting numbers
3P% has dipped down to 32% in conference play, so it has been more of a struggle than earlier in the year
This is true, but he will probably go off on IowaReuvers is a candy ass.
If we can control the tempo and rebound well, then we should be ok IMO. 3/4 court press and hit our FT's. Agree with you on the press. Let's see how the zebras treat us.We need to press, bother, push them off their game by tying to run them out of the gym. Wear them out.
We might win by 14 but no way do we score 86 points with the slow game that Wisc. plays...Hawks-86
wisconsin-72
Hawks are favored tomorrow baby!
They were -1.5 all day yesterday. Moved to even and now Wisconsin -1Where?
![]()
Iowa at Wisconsin - 02/19/21 - DRatings.com
Game Analysis for Iowa at Wisconsin. See our bet values and picks for the money lines, run lines, and over/under for each game.www.dratings.com
Vegas breakdown says CJ Frederick "Questionable"
Kenpom also has Iowa as a 1 pt favorite
Always an x factor in these games. Someone no one expects will have a career night and be the difference in the game.
I pick Joe T.
Potter hustles like Garza and plays dirty like Davidson. Nunge and KM more athletic than both of them.Give me Jack Nunge and/or Keegan Murray.
I think he (either/both) goes off on Potter and Reuvers - inside & out (3ptrs). And also blocks a few shots.
The Badgers should be a lot better than they are with 5 Senior starters. If we are playing reasonable defense and shooting well, we should prevail.
Those seniors are all 23, 24. Arthritis probably setting in to some degree.
Seems Garza is a bit under the weather from today's press conference.
This will be a slow ugly game. Bucky’s only shot to beat us is to try and win a slugfest.
I think hawks shoot well enough for the win
Iowa 73
Wisky 63
I almost called this one. Too bad I didn't have any guts to bet itWe might win by 14 but no way do we score 86 points with the slow game that Wisc. plays...