ADVERTISEMENT

@ Wisky Predictions

Their 3 point shooters looked great in the first half against Michigan...
 
Great content and thanks for sharing, especially how predictive shooting >33% is to winning , 10-1, although you still win ~50% of the time when shooting <33%. If you shoot over 33% you almost always win , when shooting under, its only 50/50.

im curious what the national average in this might be and if it’s not generally always true?

as a note, IOWA gives up 3Pt FG in BIG at a 35% rate, so unless Iowa decides to make it tougher on WI shooters by,moor example playing M2M, then it looks like whisky wins this by virtue of the 3Pt FG% predictive value.
I’m not sure how strong the correlation is on a national scale, but there certainly will be some correlation. In Wisconsin’s case I think it’s magnified due to the offensive skillsets on the team. There is not a strong ability to get to the rim. The majority of shots inside the arc in conference play (55% compared to 42% for Iowa) have been midrange shots, which are made at a clip 20% lower than shots near the rim. Essentially Wisconsin is more reliant on jump shooting to score than most teams, and coupled with consistent outputs defensively, you’ll see W/L record pretty strongly tied to the jump shooting numbers

3P% has dipped down to 32% in conference play, so it has been more of a struggle than earlier in the year
 
Their 3 point shooters looked great in the first half against Michigan...
This is what worries me. Iowa gets behind and can't recover, and Wisconsin suffocates Iowa in this case. Because Iowa can't defend well enough to get back in the game. Michigan could, but they have superior D against the 3.

Wisconsin's stats showing offense-related weaknesses won't be relevant enough to secure a win, because our D is not good enough to shut down their offense. We need to press, bother, push them off their game by tying to run them out of the gym. Wear them out.
 
I’m not sure how strong the correlation is on a national scale, but there certainly will be some correlation. In Wisconsin’s case I think it’s magnified due to the offensive skillsets on the team. There is not a strong ability to get to the rim. The majority of shots inside the arc in conference play (55% compared to 42% for Iowa) have been midrange shots, which are made at a clip 20% lower than shots near the rim. Essentially Wisconsin is more reliant on jump shooting to score than most teams, and coupled with consistent outputs defensively, you’ll see W/L record pretty strongly tied to the jump shooting numbers

3P% has dipped down to 32% in conference play, so it has been more of a struggle than earlier in the year

I thought Wisconsin struggled from 3pt line midway through B1G last year and then got HOT from 3pt line and rode 3pt shooting + easy schedule to share of B1G title. One thing we know is Trice seems to go off vs Iowa and make clutch baskets. Reuvers and Potter ....neither of them has much of a post game compared to Garza and that
is their big problem.

I loved seeing Iowa go off from 3pt line vs MSU but when the reverse happens and an an opponent is making every three pt shot they throw up, it is usually a long night. Assuming Wisconsin gets their 3pt shooting back and shoots 40% from 3pt line vs Iowa, it probably is a dog fight game.
 
We need to press, bother, push them off their game by tying to run them out of the gym. Wear them out.
If we can control the tempo and rebound well, then we should be ok IMO. 3/4 court press and hit our FT's. Agree with you on the press. Let's see how the zebras treat us.
 
One team will be feeling a metaphorical nut punch during and after this game, and Wisky will be going home after to put some ice on it.
 
I wish I had a prediction but I can't figure this Iowa team out. I thought we'd beat Indiana twice ... expected MSU to beat us in E. Lansing ... so I quit trying to predict what they are going to do ...
 

giphy.gif
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT