Seems like exercising our own free speech is uber-American. Blindly believing everything the richest person in the world wants you to believe is anti-american.
Wokepedia blew $50M on DEI
- Thread starter Phenomenally Frantastic
- Start date
Sorry, I don’t give much credibility to anything promoted by a guy who is offering to pay Wikipedia a billion dollars for changing their name to “Dickipedia.”
He’s a troll who deals in headlines.
How many times has PF been caught posting absolute nonsense or outright lies?
Definitely a few times, no denying that. Which puts him about 497 behind main stream media over the past 8+ years.
You know whats filthy rich? A lefty criticizing blind belief especially after the last 8 years of you all parroting big media bullshit.
I'm in agreement that blind belief is stupid. But Elon could tweet tomorrow that water is wet and you guys would figure out a way to freak out about it.
Have you not yet figured out 99% of the Elon hate is political and media manipulation?
You think it’s unreasonable to find Musk a piece of shit?
I’ll grant you that some are recent converts to the Dislike Musk team and a lot is driven by him jumping in bed with Trump.
But there are a lot of people who have not liked the guy for some time, or believe that billionaires are better seen and not heard, and are worried that he has basically bought a presidency.
I used to think the guy was quirky and interesting, then the Thailand incident showed he was a petty little bitch, then the X fiasco showed he was a thin-skinned, erratic, unstable, petty little bitch. After the last couple years, I think he’s a lying, trolling, drug addicted piece of shit who’s arguably worse than Trump.
The opposite is true also. Elon could tweet tomorrow that water is dry and guys on here would figure out a way to freak out about us criticizing him and play the victim. Big media might even be right once in a while, gotta think for yourself unfortunately.
So you like your billionaires like George Soros, kinda behind scenes manipulating things and installing judges and politicians?
Got it.
And all of these opinions, particularly those about him being "a lying drug addict" just came to you organically and coincidentally as he got more involved in media and politics? What are the odds...
Agreed. Which is why the over the top Elon hate is ridiculous and manipulated.
Just think if all those on the elon hurt my butt train held all politician to same standards.
He’s one of the most visible people in the world, by his own hand, word and deeds. Is it really surprising to you that people can and are forming opinions based on their own observations? Do you need to be told how to think and assume everyone else does as well? Feels like a little projection going on here.
Also funny you are using this argument while defending Phenomenally Frantastic, whose next original thought will be his first.
“Installing judges and politicians.” Do you realize how dumb that makes you sound?
Ah, I get it now. You’re playing the “I don’t have a dog in this fight I’m above it all and think you’re all ridiculous” role.
What next, claiming you’re a Libertarian?
Characterize it however you like, but the point is at least Elon is being public. You know, the transparency thingy.
So when he makes comments, for example, about H-1B visas people and legislators alike can have input.
Btw, I don't approve of his H-1B take. Am I nevertheless still a "fanboy" and "worshiper?"
Wiki is an awesome resource. Republicans need to suppress as much information as possible. They need to control beliefs and rewrite history. Eliminating wiki would go along way in that effort.
Perhaps they could start their own site with alternative facts. Elon could just buy wiki and use it for propaganda like twitter. The media-truth is the enemy
Perhaps they could start their own site with alternative facts. Elon could just buy wiki and use it for propaganda like twitter. The media-truth is the enemy
Less of a libertarian and more of a political realist. Elon Musk is flawed and very much imperfect, but he's more accomplished and reliable than 99% of national politicians. He deserves plenty of scrutiny... but coming from those who actively defend and even lie for politicians, no thanks.
You realize the criticism of wikipedia is they are rewriting history along the lines of their political ideology, right? They openly brag about doing the things you're here projecting on Republicans lmfao
Defends wikipedia covering the tracks of Jeffrey Epstein’s ties to Bill Clinton, goes on to judge other people.
Self awareness, zero point zero.
