ADVERTISEMENT

Women’s basketball is on the rise. A new pro league aims to take advantage.

cigaretteman

HB King
May 29, 2001
78,736
61,095
113
As a former pro who has trained some of the biggest names in the NBA and WNBA, Alex Bazzell talks basketball all day long. So it was no surprise that he and his wife, Napheesa Collier, a three-time WNBA all-star, were discussing the state of the sport after she had finished playing a game a few years ago. They sat chatting in a Los Angeles hotel when a seed was planted that could reshape the landscape of women’s basketball.


The result of that conversation was officially announced Thursday morning: Unrivaled, a new professional women’s basketball league co-founded by Collier and reigning WNBA MVP Breanna Stewart, will debut in January 2025.
“Obviously it sounds crazy at first,” Collier told The Washington Post. “ ‘We should create a league.’ It’s not like it’s just a ‘We should go out for ice cream tonight’ kind of thing.


ADVERTISING


“So, yeah, just started as a conversation randomly after a game, and then it formed into this thing where we can make so much change, and why wait for someone else to do it when we can do it ourselves?”


http://www.washingtonpost.com/sport...ard/?itid=mc_magnet-wnba_inline_collection_20

Unrivaled aims to feature 30 elite players composing six teams for a three-on-three competition played in Miami. Investors include U.S. soccer stars Megan Rapinoe and Alex Morgan, two-time NBA MVP Steve Nash, 10-time NBA all-star Carmelo Anthony, Hall of Fame coach Geno Auriemma, actor Ashton Kutcher, former ESPN president John Skipper and former Turner president David Levy and others. Bazzell will serve as league president. The business model gives players equity and a vested interest in the league, and the league said in its announcement it will offer the “highest average salary in women’s professional sports league history.”
“The women’s game is at such a pivotal point right now … but unfortunately, still, the majority of the money that we make is off the court,” Collier said. “So we want to change that … to make money playing basketball.



“Even today, as women’s basketball is on a rise, there’s a drop-off in viewership and athlete marketability and competition between the collegiate and professional level. So you really see the college game is so popular right now, and all these stars, especially this rookie class that’s coming in, it’s amazing to see the viewership and marketability go up there. But we wanted to do that on a professional level as well.”

The goal is to create a product that is easy to consume and features some of the best players in the world. The three-on-three format is expected to showcase players’ skills in a more free-flowing game, but players will still run full-court — though shorter than the regulation 94 feet. Games will last about an hour and be played on an LED court. Participants are expected to be announced in the summer, including several WNBA all-stars. Multiyear contracts are expected to keep players committed beyond a year-to-year basis.
The league has been in planning and development for two years, but the current timing seems ideal as the WNBA and NCAA women’s basketball tournament have set record viewership numbers. Huge audiences have tuned in to see young stars such as Caitlin Clark and Angel Reese after name, image and likeness (NIL) rules allowed them to grow their brand in college. WNBA teams such as the Washington Mystics have moved games against Clark’s Indiana Fever and Reese’s Chicago Sky to higher-capacity arenas to accommodate the bigger crowds they anticipate.



There’s been a lot of new leagues that started and not had success,” Levy said. “And there’s a lot of reasons for that, whether it’s operational or just talent on the field. You’ve got to remind yourself these are not brand names that nobody knows. These are the best of the best women’s basketball players in the world that are going to be competing in a three-on-three competition.
“If you closed your eyes and said, ‘If this was the NBA, would you be interested?’ And the answer, obviously, would be yes. You get to see LeBron [James] and Steph [Curry] and everybody else playing on the three-on-three tour. Here we have the best brand names in the WNBA playing. I don’t think this is quote-unquote a start-up from a standpoint of quality of the sport and the brand names.”
The league founders hope there are advantages to playing in the WNBA offseason and not being in direct competition with the established league. Bazzell is pitching the three-on-three format as quality development for WNBA players who want to grow their games during the offseason.



Many of the details still have to be worked out. Some brand partnerships are still being finalized. The biggest remaining task is evaluating and negotiating media deals with linear, digital and streaming platforms. Bazzell said they want to be as accessible and as visible as any product in sports and want to avoid fans having to “jump through hoops to go find us.”
A postgame conversation years ago seems to have been paced at the perfect speed to capitalize on interest in the women’s game that may be at an all-time high.
“There’s the old dictum that all things that you predict are going to happen, happen more slowly than you ever thought,” Skipper said, “until it becomes an inflection point and takes off at a rate you never thought it could. I think we’ve kind of hit the right moment.”

 
Season 4 Showtime GIF by Billions
 
  • Like
Reactions: seminole97
Hahaha. The league of thr best players is unprofitable and borderline unwatchable, you want people to tune in to unathletic 3v3?



Hard pass.
 
I wish CC nothing but the best and a long successful and financially rewarding career but the WNBA is going to be back to before once the CC effect simmers. They're riding a generational player in a perfect storm of social media advertising. People who have tuned in to watch her are already frustrated with the WNBA lol.
 
Hahaha. The league of thr best players is unprofitable and borderline unwatchable, you want people to tune in to unathletic 3v3?



Hard pass.

Is the NBA going to prop this up for a decade also?





WNBA revenue in 2019 was 60 million. Last year it was 200 million.

The new franchise in San Fran cost 50 million to obtain from the league.

The NBA has invested money in the past and would be dumb to not to do so in the future. Their current ownership percentage is worth around 200 Million… so yes at this point they have not made money on the investment…but the investment has the opportunity to multiply in value greatly over the next few years. If it was a stock it would be going up in value. Aces just spent 50 million building a practice facility…and they have a legendarily cheap majority ownership group (ok the Dad was legendarily cheap). There minority owner is more famous than super rich.

And if an NBA team offered a free agent contract to a player to come in and start for them at what the NBA puts into the WNBA….that players agent would report that GMs phone number as spam.

Luka Garza makes twice as much per year compared to what the NBA puts into the league per WNBA team.

There is something like 120 NBA players making as much or more than the total NBA investment.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: jaxhawk06



WNBA revenue in 2019 was 60 million. Last year it was 200 million.

The new franchise in San Fran cost 50 million to obtain from the league.

The NBA has invested money in the past and would be dumb to not to do so in the future. Their current ownership percentage is worth around 200 Million… so yes at this point they have not made money on the investment…but the investment has the opportunity to multiply in value greatly over the next few years. If it was a stock it would be going up in value. Aces just spent 50 million building a practice facility…and they have a legendarily cheap majority ownership group (ok the Dad was legendarily cheap). There minority owner is more famous than super rich.

And if an NBA team offered a free agent contract to a player to come in and start for them at what the NBA puts into the WNBA….that players agent would report that GMs phone number as spam.

Luka Garza makes twice as much per year compared to what the NBA puts into the league per WNBA team.

There is something like 120 NBA players making as much or more than the total NBA investment.
None of that you just posted changes the fact that it's an unprofitable league that been around a long ass time. Yes, they need to max out the CC effect.


It's unwatchable basketball. There is more athleticism in 4A boys basketball. Watching pros miss lay ups and air ball bunnies got old after like 2 games. I tried. More power to you if you can watch it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ICHerky
None of that you just posted changes the fact that it's an unprofitable league that been around a long ass time. Yes, they need to max out the CC effect.


It's unwatchable basketball. There is more athleticism in 4A boys basketball. Watching pros miss lay ups and air ball bunnies got old after like 2 games. I tried. More power to you if you can watch it.
If it's unwatchable then why are so many more people watching it than ever?
 
  • Like
Reactions: peacehawk
Having one of the worst head coaches I've ever seen is not helping anything
 
I wish CC nothing but the best and a long successful and financially rewarding career but the WNBA is going to be back to before once the CC effect simmers. They're riding a generational player in a perfect storm of social media advertising. People who have tuned in to watch her are already frustrated with the WNBA lol.
Yeah it'll be interesting. Have to think it's at least going to stay more popular than it was before, but I agree that there is a real CC effect.

One angle that might keep it more relevant is the people end of it. With NIL and social media female basketball personalities have become a topic of interest socially. Women pay more attention to people and what they do when it comes to entertainment... if they can stay relevant that way they may keep more eyeballs long term.

If you look at Clark's fame, it went way beyond just being a really good basketball player. Same with Reese. I don't know if that level of interest in female basketball players will stick around or not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BlIIlken2
You are seeing a blip, yes and the WNBA needs to max that.


It will not last, it's a bad product.
It's been on the rise.

WNBA ratings highest in decades as crowds also climb

Sep 15, 2023, 02:23 PM ET


NEW YORK -- The WNBA once again had strong metrics this year as the league had its most-watched regular season in 21 years and its highest average attendance since 2018.
Viewership was up 21% over last year across its national television partners, and the league's average attendance of 6,615 fans was the WNBA's highest since the 2018 season. An expanded schedule to 40 games this season helped the league gain its highest total attendance in 13 years at 1,587,488.
 
It's been on the rise.

WNBA ratings highest in decades as crowds also climb

Sep 15, 2023, 02:23 PM ET


NEW YORK -- The WNBA once again had strong metrics this year as the league had its most-watched regular season in 21 years and its highest average attendance since 2018.
Viewership was up 21% over last year across its national television partners, and the league's average attendance of 6,615 fans was the WNBA's highest since the 2018 season. An expanded schedule to 40 games this season helped the league gain its highest total attendance in 13 years at 1,587,488.
Outstanding.
 
Dumb, the WNBA is just in the last few months getting the slightest bit of attention and their brilliant idea is to create a rival league?
I get the sense that it’s more an opportunity for some of the WNBA players to make extra money in the offseason without having to go overseas to do it.

And the fact that the reigning WNBA MVP is one of the founders tells me the league is okay with it. They might even see this as an opportunity for its more marketable stars to grow their popularity and bring in additional viewers during the WNBA season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mientkiewicz
A few things can be true

WNBA is growing
WNBA has flaws with officiating & the amount of physicality they allow which hurts how entertaining some people think the product is.

I think full court 3v3 would open the floor up a lot and they could put on an entertaining product. However, I would be surprised if this league lasts. The season starts in January and they will be competing against the College Football post season, NFL, NBA, Men's College Basketball and Women's College Basketball.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VodkaSam
Stupid would be saying it is unwatchable, without ever having attempted to watch it. But you know that.


Dumbass.
No, stupid is claiming it it's unwatchable when many, many more are watching than ever before.

That and writing a sentence like: "The only way to intelligently say it is unwatchable is after an attempt to watch it radio."
 
The NBA G league is a better product than the WNBA. Women’s basketball is atrocious, very hard to watch
 
No, stupid is claiming it it's unwatchable when many, many more are watching than ever before.

That and writing a sentence like: "The only way to intelligently say it is unwatchable is after an attempt to watch it radio."
Keep swinging little buddy, maybe next time.


You are seeing a blip due to CC. It's a bad product. If you have enough free time that WNBA makes it on your radar, good foe you. I'm sure you watch tag and nick at night reruns also.
 
The reffing is terrible, sure. I watched the liberty and suns(?) Vs fever games and you have "pros" missing lay ups. It's bad.
They're much shorter and can't jump. Makes it a difficult a shot if they're closely defended.

I think the WNBA needs to be an up tempo guard and 3 point shooting centric league to be its most appealing.

Post play in women's bball isn't much fun to watch.
 
Keep swinging little buddy, maybe next time.


You are seeing a blip due to CC. It's a bad product. If you have enough free time that WNBA makes it on your radar, good foe you. I'm sure you watch tag and nick at night reruns also.
I love it when you make it so easy to expose your ignorance. Do you deny that the WNBA viewership has been increasing before CC came to the league?

I don't expect an answer but I do look forward to the nonsense you will spew next.
 
I love it when you make it so easy to expose your ignorance. Do you deny that the WNBA viewership has been increasing before CC came to the league?

I don't expect an answer but I do look forward to the nonsense you will spew next.
Move those goalpost Riley. Much El oh El.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT