ADVERTISEMENT

Women's Biggest Liability

The freshmen are the future of the squad and need more playing time even at expense of "growing pains."
So while they need playing time it's not clear the Freshman are "clearly better" than any of the starters. While they have all shown flashes and done good things they still also turn the ball over at a high rate and Heiden fouls every 30-60 seconds. They will all be good players, but at the moment none of them show they should be starting. Guyton looks to be the most ready, currently, but also wondering if she is still on a minutes thing based upon her knee injury.
 
It's pretty clear Hannah hasn't developed that 10'-15' shot she needs to play the 4.

And she's not getting the "runouts" she did with Clark. JJ will probably need to make the hard call to bench AOG at some point.
JMO
 
  • Like
Reactions: littlez
It's pretty clear Hannah hasn't developed that 10'-15' shot she needs to play the 4.

And she's not getting the "runouts" she did with Clark. JJ will probably need to make the hard call to bench AOG at some point.
JMO
This was my point at the beginning of the season and I'll continue to say it. Not sure why Jan thought she could just move Stuelke to the 4 unless we had been planning it the entire offseason and Hannah was shooting 300 12-15 foot jumpers plus a few 3's every single day. She basically played as an undersized 5 her entire career, and with CC it worked perfectly because she was a better athlete than most 5's and could beat them up and down the court and was good enough and quick enough to guard the 5 on the other end. And of course to everyone's point on here another game w/way more turnovers vs assists. 11 assists, 21 turnovers. That's an absolute killer.
 
What we've seen recently, Hawks will lose by 25+ points to UCLA/USC.
One person will patrol "the paint" and everyone else will guard the perimeter.

I'm afraid Iowa is an 8/9 seed in the post season.
Just a testament to the greatness of CC.
 
So while they need playing time it's not clear the Freshman are "clearly better" than any of the starters. While they have all shown flashes and done good things they still also turn the ball over at a high rate and Heiden fouls every 30-60 seconds.

Agree Heiden still needs to figure out her issues with fouling. While I realize the starters get more minutes it is worth noting that they accounted for 17 of the 21 turnovers against Maryland. So not sure the Freshman are turning the ball over at a high rate.
 
Agree Heiden still needs to figure out her issues with fouling. While I realize the starters get more minutes it is worth noting that they accounted for 17 of the 21 turnovers against Maryland. So not sure the Freshman are turning the ball over at a high rate.

Correct on the TOs! Also worth noting is Stremlow had the most assists with 3 (6.67 per 40 mins).

NAMEMINTOPer/40 Mins
Hannah Stuelke
20​
5​
10.00​
Kylie Feuerbach
20​
4​
8.00​
Taylor Stremlow
18​
3
6.67​
Sydney Affolter
30​
4​
5.33​
Teagan Mallegni
10​
1
4.00​
Lucy Olsen
32​
3​
3.75​
Addison O'grady
21​
1​
1.90​
Aj Ediger
5​
0​
0.00​
Aaliyah Guyton
16​
0​
0.00​
Ava Heiden
6​
0​
0.00​
Taylor Mccabe
18​
0​
0.00​
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scott559
It's pretty clear Hannah hasn't developed that 10'-15' shot she needs to play the 4.

And she's not getting the "runouts" she did with Clark. JJ will probably need to make the hard call to bench AOG at some point.
JMO
Runouts- that's hard to do when she is inbounding the ball... which begs the question - why is she doing that?
 
Correct on the TOs! Also worth noting is Stremlow had the most assists with 3 (6.67 per 40 mins).

NAMEMINTOPer/40 Mins
Hannah Stuelke
20​
5​
10.00​
Kylie Feuerbach
20​
4​
8.00​
Taylor Stremlow
18​
3
6.67​
Sydney Affolter
30​
4​
5.33​
Teagan Mallegni
10​
1
4.00​
Lucy Olsen
32​
3​
3.75​
Addison O'grady
21​
1​
1.90​
Aj Ediger
5​
0​
0.00​
Aaliyah Guyton
16​
0​
0.00​
Ava Heiden
6​
0​
0.00​
Taylor Mccabe
18​
0​
0.00​
Wow. A really sad commentary that this chart is topped by all the returning players, mostly 4th and 5th year players. For Hannah and Syd thats really disappointing. I think that shows they're outside of their comfort zone. Kylie really doesn't surprise me. She's always made poor decisions with the ball both passing and driving into traffic in the lane. I just didn't buy it went people said she would take a big step up this year with more minutes. She plays hard especially on defense, but she's not a skilled offensive player, and you just don't make that kind of jump in your 5th year in college.
 
AOG can play the 4. She has a beautiful 10 - 12 foot shot. Also, she can pass. It's worth a try when we want to go big.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DewHawk
I wonder what everybody thought of Iowa two years ago when they lost by around 30 points to Maryland, and last year when they lost by around 20 points to Indiana.
 
I wonder what everybody thought of Iowa two years ago when they lost by around 30 points to Maryland, and last year when they lost by around 20 points to Indiana.
This is a very good point, and helps to keep some perspective.
I keep reminding myself that despite everything, and despite Maryland hitting 3s like it was their primary MO, Iowa still won the second half.
Encouraged to know Jensen doesn't want that entry pass from the wing. Still unsure what she's thinking about her rotations.

Let's see if they all learned something from that game. Despite all the frustration, I'm rooting for them to get some good wins.
 
Obviously adding 2 top 5 teams to the league and one of those being number 1 has also made it much tougher for all. Then you toss in a totally revamped Maryland team that’s top 7 plus the usual suspects and a daunting schedule and you’re looking for some easy games, of which there aren’t many. We’re a good team in a really really good league.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kceasthawk
What we've seen recently, Hawks will lose by 25+ points to UCLA/USC.
One person will patrol "the paint" and everyone else will guard the perimeter.

I'm afraid Iowa is an 8/9 seed in the post season.
Just a testament to the greatness of CC.
You build off that greatness. It’s shouldn’t be a reason to fall behind, it should be the reason you move forward. The recruiting is the problem. We had some big misses.
 
  • Like
Reactions: littlez
I wonder what everybody thought of Iowa two years ago when they lost by around 30 points to Maryland, and last year when they lost by around 20 points to Indiana.
For me, I thought well, that was a clunker, need to flush it and move on. And the team did and rarely lost. For this team, I don’t have that feeling that water will shed off the duck’s back.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ddeanHawk
Doodle has been saying it since the first game of the year....the biggest thing we're missing from CC isn't her scoring, crowd- and team-energizing logo 3's, assists (of both the circus and garden varieties), or even leadership, as important as all of those are.

It's her speed.

The absurd pace with which we were able to play with her on the court was a massive difference-maker. It put immense pressure on opposing teams and resulted in countless easy buckets in transition.

Now our top speed barely rivals what you might see in a typical elementary school crosswalk. Opposing players needn't worry about getting back at full gallop anymore and can comfortably pick up ball pressure much further up the court. Then, when our half-court game isn't operating efficiently, we don't have a transition game to fall back on. That is the one thing we lost with Caitlin's departure that we simply can't replicate. It's also, IDHO, why people seem eager to see Guyton get more minutes.
 
Doodle has been saying it since the first game of the year....the biggest thing we're missing from CC isn't her scoring, crowd- and team-energizing logo 3's, assists (of both the circus and garden varieties), or even leadership, as important as all of those are.

It's her speed.

The absurd pace with which we were able to play with her on the court was a massive difference-maker. It put immense pressure on opposing teams and resulted in countless easy buckets in transition.

Now our top speed barely rivals what you might see in a typical elementary school crosswalk. Opposing players needn't worry about getting back at full gallop anymore and can comfortably pick up ball pressure much further up the court. Then, when our half-court game isn't operating efficiently, we don't have a transition game to fall back on. That is the one thing we lost with Caitlin's departure that we simply can't replicate. It's also, IDHO, why people seem eager to see Guyton get more minutes.
IMHO, speed was just a single ingredient, along with size/length, court vision/awareness, dribbling skill, shooting skill, passing skill, and a clutch factor, all of which were of A+ caliber. On offense, she truly stretched and used every inch of the court and players on every inch of the court creating space, movement, and scoring opportunities. The crowds, scoring, logo 3's, and assists were the residue of all of that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fish1hawk
IMHO, speed was just a single ingredient, along with size/length, court vision/awareness, dribbling skill, shooting skill, passing skill, and a clutch factor, all of which were of A+ caliber. On offense, she truly stretched and used every inch of the court and players on every inch of the court creating space, movement, and scoring opportunities. The crowds, scoring, logo 3's, and assists were the residue of all of that.
She had it all. Just look at the last game of the men and women. Depending on the narrative, great comebacks for Iowa or choked under pressure or nearly so for Nebraska and Maryland. The mental aspect of the game is important and CC had it too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tenacious E
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT