ADVERTISEMENT

Work Email Chain Found That Hillary Did Not Disclose, Possible Perjury Violation

Well, I learn something every day. Thanks.

However, the underlying political point remains the same. Numerous statements Hillary has made, some under oath and some not (whether it makes a difference or not) are simply wrong, and either she knew they were wrong when she made them, or she is amazingly incompetent.

It is going to be interesting to watch the Democrats on the House committee try to defend her.....if they do. This might prove to be too much even for Elijah Cummings.
Lone......
Just think about Terry and his song and dance about the privitization of Iowa MedicAid and see the similarities to Hilary and her "e-mails." You and I both understand that Branstad is moving MedicAid as a get back at the public sector unions and to reward his friends in the insurance industry. There has never been any reason (fraud, mismanagement) to justify this move to the private sector. Terry did it because he could. He just wanted to show the Dems he was boss.
Likewise, I believe Hilary ran her e-mails the way she did, because she could. I seriously doubt there is any think unlawful with what she did. I seriously doubt any state secrets were lost. I think this whole "Lybian scandal" is anything more than a giant snafu. I just don't think there was any intent more than "I wanted to do it that way" in both these guys cases. Hilary did it because she could.
Personally, I believe lots more folks will be hurt by Teflon's actions than Hilary's. Right now, the body count is 4 for Hilary and 3 for Teflon.........if your one for keeping score.
 
  • Like
Reactions: THE_DEVIL
Lone......
Just think about Terry and his song and dance about the privitization of Iowa MedicAid and see the similarities to Hilary and her "e-mails." You and I both understand that Branstad is moving MedicAid as a get back at the public sector unions and to reward his friends in the insurance industry. There has never been any reason (fraud, mismanagement) to justify this move to the private sector. Terry did it because he could. He just wanted to show the Dems he was boss.
Likewise, I believe Hilary ran her e-mails the way she did, because she could. I seriously doubt there is any think unlawful with what she did. I seriously doubt any state secrets were lost. I think this whole "Lybian scandal" is anything more than a giant snafu. I just don't think there was any intent more than "I wanted to do it that way" in both these guys cases. Hilary did it because she could.
Personally, I believe lots more folks will be hurt by Teflon's actions than Hilary's. Right now, the body count is 4 for Hilary and 3 for Teflon.........if your one for keeping score.
WTF are you trying to say?
 
WTF are you trying to say?
Often time Lone, "breaking the law" and ethical violations are all in the eye of the beholder. I really don't think that Hilary violated any law. I really don't think Terry broke the law either. However, I think that both really adjusted their value systems to fit their intentions.
You can't get all outraged at Hilary without wondering whose interests Branstad is serving.
 
Often time Lone, "breaking the law" and ethical violations are all in the eye of the beholder. I really don't think that Hilary violated any law. I really don't think Terry broke the law either. However, I think that both really adjusted their value systems to fit their intentions.
You can't get all outraged at Hilary without wondering whose interests Branstad is serving.
Yes, I can.
 
Often time Lone, "breaking the law" and ethical violations are all in the eye of the beholder. I really don't think that Hilary violated any law. I really don't think Terry broke the law either. However, I think that both really adjusted their value systems to fit their intentions.
You can't get all outraged at Hilary without wondering whose interests Branstad is serving.

So you support both Hillary and Terry?
 
some author yesterday on Hannity show validates oit prediction that Hillary comes down with sudden and devastating health condition and uses that as excuse to bolt
 
Does that mean you are on Terry's "friends" list and are receiving some of the goodies he's been distributing during his last term?
No. In fact, I've never been a big fan of the governor. Voted against him the first time he ran. In subsequent elections, the opponent has been worse.

Also, I didn't like the way he and the late Marvin Pomerantz were trying to turn Iowa State in a second-class institution.
 
No. In fact, I've never been a big fan of the governor. Voted against him the first time he ran. In subsequent elections, the opponent has been worse.

Also, I didn't like the way he and the late Marvin Pomerantz were trying to turn Iowa State in a second-class institution.
But I'm sure you're happy that he and the current Bruce Rastetter are trying to turn Iowa into a second-class institution.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
Often time Lone, "breaking the law" and ethical violations are all in the eye of the beholder. I really don't think that Hilary violated any law. I really don't think Terry broke the law either. However, I think that both really adjusted their value systems to fit their intentions.
You can't get all outraged at Hilary without wondering whose interests Branstad is serving.


She had TOP SECRET/SCI information on an unclassified computer system in a home not on a secure base or area.

That's breaking the law, plain and simple. She most CERTAINLY did something wrong.
 
So you support both Hillary and Terry?
Don't know yet. Let the Hilary thing play out. Nothing has been proven yet. Teflon on the other hand, is paying back his political allies......so transparently obvious. There is NO reason to change Iowa's MedicAid program.....except to give money to others who have been outside to pay loop. All Branstad is doing to hurting those Iowans who need the most help.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
Screen_Shot_2015-09-30_at_4.50.06_PM.0.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT