ADVERTISEMENT

Would you take Phil Parker for the next head coach at Iowa?

Lavar Woods 100%! Plus with LW you get someone who will be here for a long time which is an Iowa trait. Longevity! I see PP hanging it up when KF does. If not then maybe a year or two after KF is done. LW is brilliant and highly driven and deeply entrenched in Iowa City. He is a Hawkeye and sounds like his son will be too.
Iowa is a top 25 program. I think Beth will bring in the best high ptofile coach she can find. Lester, maybe if he proves himself a worthy prospect. I think anything less than a coordinator level is short changing our program.
 
  • Like
Reactions: San_Antonio_Hawk
Phil makes $1.9M/year to do exactly what he wants to do.....Own the defense and be able to specifically coach DBs (his specialty). Phil has no desire to hobnob with boosters, do the media stuff and all the other BS a HC is required to do.

If we're limiting ourselves to internal hires, my preference would be Seth Wallace. He was the architect and instigator of moving to the 4-2-5. He's been a defensive coordinator in the past. He's the son of a longtime head coach. He's good with the media. He's a damn good recruiter which would still be needed as a HC. And he's the current Asst Head Coach. Also, I think he'd be the one HC hire that could convince Phil to hang around for a few more years.

But we're Top 15 in the country in total wins over the last 25 years. We're in one of the top 2 conferences in the country. We pay our HC well and you've got the opportunity for longevity even if you struggle out of the gate......all things that would be extremely attractive to a lot of folks on the outside.
 
Phil wants to be a head coach. He's flat out said it when asked. Still, no one has offered him. No, we won't be hiring him. Much better chance it's Seth Wallace.
 
Iowa is a top 25 program. I think Beth will bring in the best high ptofile coach she can find. Lester, maybe if he proves himself a worthy prospect. I think anything less than a coordinator level is short changing our program.
High profile like Kirk was?

I think anyone that's not an "Iowa guy" would be short-changing the program
 
Last edited:
What if KF has set up Tyler Barnes to be the next head coach, given the changing landscape of college football? He is already Chief of Staff and General Manager. He can keep or hire as need be, can deal with the new NIL crap, head up recruiting, and let his coordinator's coordinate, game plan, and recruit.

I actually feel like this is where college football is going.

The head recruiting position is becoming the GM, and growing in importance. But Barnes moving to HC is not realistic.

Alabama just gave their GM a deal to make him the highest-paid front office figure. He will make $825k per year over 3 years.

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: JerseyCityHawki
The head recruiting position is becoming the GM, and growing in importance. But Barnes moving to HC is not realistic.

Alabama just gave their GM a deal to make him the highest-paid front office figure. He will make $825k over 3 years.

Yes, Barnes as HC probably isn't realistic. I just feel like HC will become less about coaching and more about managing the flood of money so used him as an example.
 
If PP decides to ride off into the sunset when KF retires, the greatest continuity would be to hire Woods as HC and let Wallace take over as DC.
Does anyone know if Fry recruited Woods? Would be pretty cool to have someone that spanned both coached.
 
Well, there are two trains of thought here, neither of which lead to PP being a HC. He doesn't want that and will more than likely retire when KF does.

1) Hire inside what would probably be Woods or Wallace. Big bonus would be the continuity of the staff and recruiting but you are probably losing a HC and DC at the same time.

2) Hire a big name from outside. More risky but possibly a great upside.

Don't let people fool you, Iowa is a great job for a HC. Great fan support, great conference, money, facilities. The school has shown great loyalty to coaches. Drawback is not a ton of local talent but you are about 4 hours in every direction from a large recruiting areas- Chi, Min, KC, Oma, DSM, St L, Indy. I feel like distance for recruits is less and less of a factor as it was 20/30 years ago.
 
Well, there are two trains of thought here, neither of which lead to PP being a HC. He doesn't want that and will more than likely retire when KF does.

1) Hire inside what would probably be Woods or Wallace. Big bonus would be the continuity of the staff and recruiting but you are probably losing a HC and DC at the same time.

2) Hire a big name from outside. More risky but possibly a great upside.

Don't let people fool you, Iowa is a great job for a HC. Great fan support, great conference, money, facilities. The school has shown great loyalty to coaches. Drawback is not a ton of local talent but you are about 4 hours in every direction from a large recruiting areas- Chi, Min, KC, Oma, DSM, St L, Indy. I feel like distance for recruits is less and less of a factor as it was 20/30 years ago.
Very well said
 
Dude. That was a different time. But hey, we could have had Terry Allen, lolol..
Why? Because of NIL?

If so, I don't see how that changes much. If kids were concerned with quality of coaching they'd be choosing Iowa already. Those type of recruits will follow the money.

If donors aren't going to pony up for Kirk, they won't for anyone
 
Why? Because of NIL?

If so, I don't see how that changes much. If kids were concerned with quality of coaching they'd be choosing Iowa already. Those type of recruits will follow the money.

If donors aren't going to pony up for Kirk, they won't for anyone
Your pointing out that Kirk wasn't "high profile". And?? Who on the list was high profile. Bob Stoops wasn't a quality head coach at that point. Terry Allen? Pfff... When Hayden was retiring we hadn't been really good for a few years. Nor were Iowa coaches paid like they are now. I do believe we could hire a quality HC at this juncture. I'm not so sure in 1998 that was the case, at least not one with much of a track record.
 
I don’t want anyone to be head coach that doesn’t want to be head coach. And if Phil wanted to be a head coach, he would have been one by now.
 
What if KF has set up Tyler Barnes to be the next head coach, given the changing landscape of college football? He is already Chief of Staff and General Manager. He can keep or hire as need be, can deal with the new NIL crap, head up recruiting, and let his coordinator's coordinate, game plan, and recruit.

I actually feel like this is where college football is going.
When has Tyler Barnes had success as a college FB coach, ever??/ I dont know his total resume but he is mainly head of recruiting but I dont think he goes out to recruit but just manages the function
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT