It will be interesting to see in future years how advanced stats might impact CC's MVP chances. Based on her college days, I have long thought that there is a bias in certain advanced value stats against guards, and that turnovers negatively impact certain advanced value stats more than they should (turnovers should be a negative, the question is how much). Win Shares* seems like the worst of the advanced value stats for guard play. An example of this guard/turnover bias is Aliyah Boston having a much better Win Shares rank this season than CC. Boston is # 12 in the league in Win Shares, Clark is # 22. That seems way too low for Clark.
*Win Shares, an advanced statistic that approximates the total number of wins a player produces for their team through their play on the offensive and defensive ends of the court. (Also, by definition, there are more Win Shares to allocate to players on teams that win more.)
I fear that Win Shares may act as a drag on CC's future MVP chances (even if the Fever can win more games so there are more Win Shares to allocate). Of the past 27 MVP winners, 20 ranked 1st or 2nd in Win Shares, 5 ranked 3rd or 4th, 1 ranked 5th, and 1 ranked 8th (Tina Charles in 2012). At least for this year, CC's Win Shares rank does not get her anywhere close to being MVP.
Clark fares much better in one of the other advanced value stats, PER*Minutes^, which perhaps highlights some flaws in Win Shares.
^PER*Minutes, an estimate of the total value created by a player in their minutes played with their per minute value estimated via PER#.
#PER-player efficiency rating, an advanced statistic to estimate the per minute value of a player from box score stats.
Clark's Per*Minutes rank this year is 5th. That puts her right on the edge of historical MVP territory. 19 former MVP winners ranked either 1st or 2nd in Per*Minutes, while 5 ranked 3rd, and 3 ranked 4th.