ADVERTISEMENT

An Indian woman accused her husband of forcing her to have ‘unnatural sex.’ A judge said that’s not a crime in marriage

seminole97

HR Legend
Jun 14, 2005
23,812
24,140
113
CNN

An Indian judge has dismissed a woman’s complaint that her husband committed “unnatural sex,” because under Indian law it’s not illegal for a husband to force his wife to engage in sexual acts.

The ruling, made in the Madhya Pradesh High Court last week, shines a light on a legal loophole in India that doesn’t criminalize marital rape by a husband against his wife, if she’s over age 18.

Campaigners have been trying to change the law for years, but they say they’re up against conservatives who argue that state interference could destroy the tradition of marriage in India.

A challenge to the law has been winding its way through the country’s courtrooms, with the Delhi High Court delivering a split verdict on the issue in 2022, prompting lawyers to file an appeal in the country’s Supreme Court that is still waiting to be heard.
https://iowa.forums.rivals.com/safa...arital-rape-fight-to-criminalize-intl-hnk-dst
According to the Madhya Pradesh High Court order, the woman told police her husband came to her house in 2019, soon after they were married, and committed “unnatural sex,” under Section 377 of India’s penal code.

The offense includes non-consensual “carnal intercourse against the order of nature with any man, woman or animal,” and was historically used to prosecute same sex couples who engaged in consensual sex, before the Supreme Court decriminalized homosexuality in 2018

According to court documents, the woman alleged the act happened “on multiple occasions,” and that her husband had threatened to divorce her if she told anyone about it. She finally came forward after telling her mother, who encouraged her to file a complaint in 2022, the court heard.

The husband challenged his wife’s complaint in court, with his lawyer claiming that any “unnatural sex” between the couple was not criminal as they are married.

Delivering his judgement, Justice Gurpal Singh Ahluwalia pointed to India’s marital rape exemption, which does not make it a crime for a man to force sex on his wife, a relic of British rule more than 70 years after independence.

“When rape includes insertion of penis in the mouth, urethra or anus of a woman and if that act is committed with his wife, not below the age of fifteen years, then consent of the wife becomes immaterial … Marital rape has not been recognized so far,” the judge said.

India’s Supreme Court increased marital consent from the age of 15 to 18 in a landmark judgement in 2017.

The woman also accused her in-laws of mental and physical harassment “on account of nonfulfilment of demand of dowry,” the court order said. A trial is pending.

Ahluwalia’s remarks have once again raised questions over India’s treatment of women, who continue to face the threat of violence and discrimination in the deeply patriarchal society.

Enter your email to subscribe to the CNN Five Things Newsletter.
The world’s largest democracy of 1.4 billion has made significant strides in enacting laws to better safeguard women, but lawyers and campaigners say its reluctance to criminalize marital rape leaves women without adequate protection.

According to the 2019-2021 National Family Health Survey by the Government of India, 17.6% of more than 100,000 women ages 15-49 surveyed said they were unable to say no to their husband if they didn’t want sex, while 11% thought husbands were justified in hitting or beating his wife if she refused.
 
Interested Ooo GIF by reactionseditor
 
I would suspect it has been getting better over time though
India is a hodge podge of states. The ones I would never visit include Madhya Pradesh, Bihar, Uttarakhand, Mainpur and whatever is up north. That is Modi's electorate and kind of sad to be honest.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: NoWokeBloke
Wait, insertion of penis in the urethra???
Please elaborate GOHOX69 🤣
 
CNN

An Indian judge has dismissed a woman’s complaint that her husband committed “unnatural sex,” because under Indian law it’s not illegal for a husband to force his wife to engage in sexual acts.

The ruling, made in the Madhya Pradesh High Court last week, shines a light on a legal loophole in India that doesn’t criminalize marital rape by a husband against his wife, if she’s over age 18.

Campaigners have been trying to change the law for years, but they say they’re up against conservatives who argue that state interference could destroy the tradition of marriage in India.

A challenge to the law has been winding its way through the country’s courtrooms, with the Delhi High Court delivering a split verdict on the issue in 2022, prompting lawyers to file an appeal in the country’s Supreme Court that is still waiting to be heard.
https://iowa.forums.rivals.com/safari-reader://www.cnn.com/2023/12/02/india/india-marital-rape-fight-to-criminalize-intl-hnk-dst
According to the Madhya Pradesh High Court order, the woman told police her husband came to her house in 2019, soon after they were married, and committed “unnatural sex,” under Section 377 of India’s penal code.

The offense includes non-consensual “carnal intercourse against the order of nature with any man, woman or animal,” and was historically used to prosecute same sex couples who engaged in consensual sex, before the Supreme Court decriminalized homosexuality in 2018

According to court documents, the woman alleged the act happened “on multiple occasions,” and that her husband had threatened to divorce her if she told anyone about it. She finally came forward after telling her mother, who encouraged her to file a complaint in 2022, the court heard.

The husband challenged his wife’s complaint in court, with his lawyer claiming that any “unnatural sex” between the couple was not criminal as they are married.

Delivering his judgement, Justice Gurpal Singh Ahluwalia pointed to India’s marital rape exemption, which does not make it a crime for a man to force sex on his wife, a relic of British rule more than 70 years after independence.

“When rape includes insertion of penis in the mouth, urethra or anus of a woman and if that act is committed with his wife, not below the age of fifteen years, then consent of the wife becomes immaterial … Marital rape has not been recognized so far,” the judge said.

India’s Supreme Court increased marital consent from the age of 15 to 18 in a landmark judgement in 2017.

The woman also accused her in-laws of mental and physical harassment “on account of nonfulfilment of demand of dowry,” the court order said. A trial is pending.

Ahluwalia’s remarks have once again raised questions over India’s treatment of women, who continue to face the threat of violence and discrimination in the deeply patriarchal society.

Enter your email to subscribe to the CNN Five Things Newsletter.
The world’s largest democracy of 1.4 billion has made significant strides in enacting laws to better safeguard women, but lawyers and campaigners say its reluctance to criminalize marital rape leaves women without adequate protection.

According to the 2019-2021 National Family Health Survey by the Government of India, 17.6% of more than 100,000 women ages 15-49 surveyed said they were unable to say no to their husband if they didn’t want sex, while 11% thought husbands were justified in hitting or beating his wife if she refused.
Animals..........
 
Agreed. Place is going to shit. I've said that many times. But here's the kicker buttlick. The British, you know your ancestors, made that law and all of India's penal code. You know, white people. So blame your ancestors douche bag. They were and are animals. True.
I'm Irish, Braindead. My ancestors killed more "English" than you have brain cells..........
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Tradition
Agreed. Place is going to shit. I've said that many times. But here's the kicker buttlick. The British, you know your ancestors, made that law and all of India's penal code. You know, white people. So blame your ancestors douche bag. They were and are animals. True.
So Indian women here in the US are known for not being shrinking violets. Are they different in India?
 
So Indian women here in the US are known for not being shrinking violets. Are they different in India?
India had a prime minister who won multiple wars. You have Google right? Has the US had a female president? Fyi the pm is the highest position in office in a parliamentary form of government but I bet you knew that.
 
Sad huh? Your ancestors are rapists apparently.
And an old custom in India was the wife in India whose husband died was forced to die as well being burned alive on his funeral pyre. Does that make Indians murderers?
 
And an old custom in India was the wife in India whose husband died was forced to die as well being burned alive on his funeral pyre. Does that make Indians murderers?
You're referring to sati. That was outlawed in the 1800s and even when it was legal happened as infrequently as alien visitations. Your culture has had enough deviant things in its past. Got anymore racist tropes?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: NotTHATscience1
You're referring to sati. That was outlawed in the 1800s and even when it was legal happened as infrequently as alien visitations. Your culture has had enough deviant things in its past. Got anymore racist tropes?
Stop it. You are not of a different race, just a different culture. But you’re quick to take offense when you invite such remarks after saying white people were rapists…
Sati was outlawed - by the British I believe - in the late 1800’s but it was initially difficult to eradicate the practice. Am I wrong?
Every culture (see - you slipped there) has had deviant or less than laudatory behavior in its history.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ButtersHawk
Stop it. You are not of a different race, just a different culture. But you’re quick to take offense when you invite such remarks after saying white people were rapists…
Sati was outlawed - by the British I believe - in the late 1800’s but it was initially difficult to eradicate the practice. Am I wrong?
Every culture (see - you slipped there) has had deviant or less than laudatory behavior in its history.
The British also created the marital rape law. Again, you have Google. If you can rightfully say the British outlawed Sati, which is correct, you can equally say that they put on the books the marital rape law. Do I think it's right? No. I personally think Modi is a bad person for India and the Indian Supreme Court is garbage. The same thing is happening in the US with uncle Tom Clarence Thomas and insurrectionist Alito. You can deny that equivalency but it's true. And no one thinks I'm white so I'm a different race.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: NotTHATscience1
The British also created the marital rape law. Again, you have Google. If you can rightfully say the British outlawed Sati, which is correct, you can equally say that they put on the books the marital rape law. Do I think it's right? No. I personally think Modi is a bad person for India and the Indian Supreme Court is garbage. The same thing is happening in the US with uncle Tom Clarence Thomas and insurrectionist Alito. You can deny that equivalency but it's true. And no one thinks I'm white so I'm a different race.
You’re in an unfortunate and unreasonable mood tonight. Far be it from me to defend any laws the Brits imposed on their “Empire” days. I’m of Irish heritage and they forbade the Irish to have schools.
Hurling insults - racial ones at that - is not a nice thing. And inferring there’s an equivalency is so off base.
Hope tomorrow is a better day for you.
 
You’re in an unfortunate and unreasonable mood tonight.
Hurling insults - racial ones at that - is not a nice thing. And inferring there’s an equivalency is so off base.
Hope tomorrow is a better day for you.
Same to you. I thought you were better than racial tropes. Sad to see. Every culture has its flaws; you should look in the mirror sometime.
 
Same to you. I thought you were better than racial tropes. Sad to see. Every culture has its flaws; you should look in the mirror sometime.
Are you drinking tonight? You’re really off base here.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT