May be making a quick trip to pick something up in Frankfurt Germany at the end of the week. Depending on the timing, I’ll either be there for 12 hours or 24. Anyone ever been and have any quick must dos? Restaurant recommendations?

The whistleblower
The Justice Department revealed discrepancies in how Fulton County Prosecutor Fani Willis utilized federal grant funds, substantiating claims made by a whistleblower. The whistleblower, who accused the Fulton County office of mismanaging $488,000 in federal grant funds for expenses like "swag," computers, and travel, was previously terminated by Willis.

Reporting discrepancies
“It’s that same grant that the Justice Department’s Office of Justice Programs now says is plagued with reporting discrepancies from Willis’s office,” the Washington Free Beacon’s Andrew Kerr reported.

The discrepancies
The Justice Department has not elaborated on the specifics of the discrepancies reported by Willis regarding the $488,000 federal grant designated for establishing a Center for Youth Empowerment and Gang Prevention in Atlanta. Despite the grant concluding in September 2023, the center never became operational.

Grant reporting inconsistencies
In conjunction with Willis's office, the Justice Department is working to address the grant reporting inconsistencies while a House Judiciary Committee investigation into Willis's handling of federal grant funds is ongoing.

Rep. Jim Jordan
Rep. Jim Jordan (R., Ohio), the committee chairman, issued a subpoena to Willis in early February for documentation related to the $488,000 federal grant and the whistleblower claims brought forth by former Willis employee Amanda Timpson, who served as the grant director until her abrupt dismissal by the district attorney in January 2022.

Contempt of Congress
On March 14, Jordan warned of the possibility of holding Willis in contempt of Congress after she replied to his subpoena with a limited set of documents unrelated to Timpson's whistleblower claims.

Unreasonable and unorthodox
In her response, Willis criticized Jordan's demands as "unreasonable and unorthodox," insinuating that his inquiry was an attempt to obstruct her case involving election interference against former President Donald Trump.

Examination
In a statement, a spokesperson for the Department of Justice acknowledged to the Beacon that discrepancies were identified during their examination of Willis's office.

Some inconsistencies
“During our review of the award to respond to this inquiry, we have noticed some inconsistencies in what Fulton County has reported to [the Federal Subaward Reporting System] and we are working with them to update their reporting accordingly,” the spokeswoman said.

Use of federal funds
The examination of Willis' use of federal funds is the most recent controversy affecting her office as she pursues the prosecution of former President Donald Trump.

The Trump case
In March, Willis' former romantic partner and colleague, Nathan Wade, stepped down from the Trump case, providing a political win for the former president.

Conflict of interest
Despite allegations of a conflict of interest due to their past relationship, Fulton County Judge Scott McAfee determined that there was no tangible conflict necessitating Willis' removal from the case.

Democratic operative
Reports emerged in February suggesting that the Biden administration had placed a Democratic operative within a Fulton County office to target Trump.

2024 presidential election
If these claims are accurate, it could strongly indicate that the administration interfered in the 2024 presidential election.

Damn Goa'ulds.

Login to view embedded media

Hopefully he tells all about ‘pezzing’ his ex-wife and Ronald Goldman.

Always somebody else’s fault…

The executive director of Little Rock’s airport, who was injured earlier this week in a shootout with federal agents serving a search warrant at his home, died on Thursday.

Bill and Hillary Clinton National Airport said in a statement that Bryan Malinowski died at noon. He was 53.

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives said agents were trying to serve the warrant just after 6 a.m. Tuesday at Malinowski’s home in west Little Rock when someone inside fired gunshots at the agents, news outlets reported. The agents returned fire, striking the shooter, who was identified as Malinowski. An unidentified ATF agent was also shot but the wound was not life-threatening, officials said.

In a heavily redacted warrant affidavit released Thursday, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives said Malinowski bought over 150 guns between May 2021 and February 2024 that he resold without a dealer’s license, KARK-TV reported.


About a half-dozen of those were found after being linked to a crime, and undercover federal agents bought three more from Malinowski at Arkansas gun shows, the affidavit said.

Malinowski bought the guns through legal means and checked a box on the purchase form to say they were for himself, according to the document. He would then resell them in as little as 24 hours through gun shows where he maintained a table or through private sales.

In a statement, Malinowski’s family called the shooting “an unspeakable tragedy and one that is almost impossible to understand.” The family said their thoughts and prayers go out to the government agent who was shot and his relatives.

The statement also expressed concern about the allegations in the affidavit and said that even if true, they didn’t justify the use of deadly force.


“At worst, Bryan Malinowski, a gun owner and gun enthusiast, stood accused of making private firearm sales to a person who may not have been legally entitled to purchase the guns,” the family said, adding they would wait for al the facts to come out.

There was no immediate response to a phone message seeking comment that was left Thursday with an ATF spokesman.

Malinowski joined the management team at Clinton National in 2008 as director of properties, planning and development before being promoted to deputy director of the airport a year later. He took over as executive director in 2019.

Bill Walker, chair of the Little Rock Municipal Airport Commission, said that under Malinowski’s leadership the airport saw “significant growth and success.” It offered condolences to Malinowski’s family.


“Bryan was a 16-year employee of the airport,” Walker said in the statement. “Under his leadership, our airport has experienced significant growth and success, expanding services and offerings to our community and state. We extend our heartfelt condolences to Bryan’s wife, Maer, loved ones and friends.”

Click to expand...

Teacher fired after refusing to use student’s preferred pronouns scores major legal victory
In 2018, a high school French teacher named Peter Vlaming was dismissed from his position at West Point High School in Virginia. This action was taken after he repeatedly declined to use a transgender student's chosen pronouns, despite the school administration's directives.

Legal Actions Post-Firing
Following his dismissal, Vlaming initiated legal proceedings against the school board in 2019. The controversy centered around his refusal to use male pronouns for a transgender boy, opting instead to avoid pronouns entirely when addressing or referring to the student.

Court's Initial Decision
The initial lawsuit brought by Vlaming was dismissed by the courts. The dismissal underscored the balance between individual religious beliefs and the constitutional protections of diverse thoughts and expressions.

The Role of Free Speech
Vlaming, supported by the Alliance Defending Freedom, contended that the school's actions infringed upon his rights to free speech and free exercise of religion, as protected under both the Virginia Constitution and the Virginia Religious Freedom Restoration Act.

Lawsuit Overturned
The Virginia Supreme Court later overturned the initial dismissal of Vlaming's lawsuit, a decision that prompted responses from various legal and civil rights groups, including the ACLU, which emphasized the necessity of equitable treatment for all students in educational settings.

Reaction from Vlaming's Legal Team
Following the Supreme Court's decision, Vlaming's attorney lauded the ruling as a validation of constitutional rights, criticizing the school board for attempting to compel Vlaming to conform to its views on gender identity.

Allegations of Rights Violations
The Supreme Court's decision to reinstate the lawsuit was based on allegations that the school board had indeed violated Vlaming's rights, although it did not conclusively resolve the merits of the case.

Defense of Vlaming's Actions
Vlaming's attorney argued that his dismissal was not due to an action he took, but rather for his inability to comply with speech that conflicted with his religious convictions, a stance supported by the court's decision to allow the lawsuit to proceed.

Religious and Philosophical Beliefs
Vlaming defended his actions by citing his religious and philosophical beliefs, which he claimed were infringed upon by the school's demands. This defense highlights a significant conflict between individual beliefs and institutional policies.

“Systemic Incompetence” First Black Female Judge FIRED After Robbing Town & Blaming Racism
In a stunning turn of events, the once-prominent Judge Christina Peterson, hailed as a pioneer for her historic role as the first black female judge in Douglas County, Georgia, finds herself at the center of a scandalous downfall. What began as a promising career trajectory has unraveled into a tale of corruption, incompetence, and abuse of power, casting a shadow over the integrity of the judicial system.

The Rise and Fall of Christina Peterson
Peterson’s ascent to the bench was marked by optimism and celebration, as she shattered barriers and broke new ground as a minority woman in a predominantly white, male-dominated profession. Her election in 2020, amidst the backdrop of heightened social justice movements, symbolized progress and inclusivity in the legal realm. However, her meteoric rise was soon overshadowed by a series of alarming revelations.

Systemic Incompetence Unveiled
As investigations unfolded, Peterson’s tenure as a judge came under intense scrutiny, revealing a pattern of systemic incompetence and flagrant disregard for ethical standards. Despite lacking prior judicial experience, Peterson brazenly demanded exorbitant salary increases and exploited her position to amass personal wealth, pocketing hefty fees and circumventing established protocols.

Exploitation of Identity
Peterson’s defense strategy relied heavily on her identity as a black woman, attempting to deflect criticism by invoking accusations of racism and sexism. However, her tactics of manipulation and exploitation only served to exacerbate public outrage and undermine the legitimacy of her position. Instead of upholding the principles of justice and equality, Peterson weaponized her identity to shield herself from accountability.

Judicial Misconduct Exposed
The litany of misconduct attributed to Peterson extends far beyond mere incompetence, encompassing a spectrum of unethical behavior and abuse of authority. From needlessly delaying legal proceedings to arbitrarily incarcerating individuals, Peterson’s actions reek of hubris and entitlement, betraying the trust of the community she was sworn to serve.

A Reign of Terror
Peterson’s tenure as a judge was marked by a reign of terror, characterized by vindictiveness, spite, and a blatant disregard for the rule of law. Her propensity for intimidation and manipulation cast a chilling shadow over the courtroom, instilling fear and uncertainty among litigants and court personnel alike.

Calls for Accountability
In the wake of Peterson’s ousting, calls for accountability reverberate throughout Douglas County, as residents demand justice for the egregious abuses committed under her watch. The judicial system, once revered as a bastion of fairness and impartiality, now grapples with the fallout of Peterson’s betrayal and the urgent need for systemic reform.

Lessons Learned
The scandal surrounding Peterson serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of prioritizing identity over competence and integrity in positions of authority. It underscores the critical importance of holding public officials accountable for their actions and upholding the principles of transparency and accountability.

Rebuilding Trust
As Douglas County seeks to rebuild trust in its judicial system, efforts to root out corruption and restore integrity must be undertaken with utmost urgency. Transparency, accountability, and adherence to ethical standards are paramount in restoring faith in the judiciary and ensuring that such egregious abuses of power never occur again.

Moving Forward
As the dust settles on Peterson’s ignominious downfall, the focus shifts towards charting a path forward for Douglas County and its legal system. The lessons learned from this sordid saga must inform policies and practices aimed at preventing similar scandals in the future, reaffirming the commitment to justice, fairness, and equality for all. Only through steadfast dedication to these principles can the wounds inflicted by Peterson’s actions begin to heal, paving the way for a brighter and more just future.


This is just another example of how DEI doesn't work.

How many more Fanni Willis or Christina Petersons are out there?




Moving Forward©Image Credit: United Liberty
As the dust settles on Peterson’s ignominious downfall, the focus shifts towards charting a path forward for Douglas County and its legal system. The lessons learned from this sordid saga must inform policies and practices aimed at preventing similar scandals in the future, reaffirming the commitment to justice, fairness, and equality for all. Only through steadfast dedication to these principles can the wounds inflicted by Peterson’s actions begin to heal, paving the way for a brighter and more just future.

California is facing a budget crisis with a projected record deficit of $73 billion, as reported by the Legislative Analyst’s Office.

The deficit increase is attributed to a $24 billion revenue erosion, leading to a $15 billion rise in the budget problem.

The state’s population has been declining, with many residents leaving for states like Texas, Arizona, Florida, and Washington.



Everyone who voted for Newsom deserves this complete failure by State Government.

California spent $24 billion to tackle homelessness over the past five years but didn’t consistently track whether the huge outlay of public money actually improved the situation, according to state audit released Tuesday.

With makeshift tents lining the streets and disrupting businesses in cities and towns throughout California, homelessness has become one of the most frustrating and seemingly intractable issues in the country's most populous state. An estimated 171,000 people are homeless in California, which amounts to roughly 30% of all of the homeless people in the U.S.

Despite the roughly billions of dollars spent on more than 30 homeless and housing programs during the 2018-2023 fiscal years, California doesn't have reliable data needed to fully understand why the problem didn’t improve in many cities, according to state auditor's report.

“This report concludes that the state must do more to assess the cost-effectiveness of its homelessness programs,” State Auditor Grant Parks wrote in a letter to Gov. Gavin Newsom and lawmakers.

The audit analyzed five programs that received a combined $13.7 billion in funding. It determined that only two of them are “likely cost-effective," including one that converts hotel and motel rooms into housing and another that provides housing assistance to prevent families from becoming homeless.

Under the $3.6-billion program that converts hotel and motel rooms, which is a linchpin in Newsom's homelessness plan, the average cost of a room is at least 2.5 times cheaper than building a new home, the audit found. The housing assistance program, which has received $760 million over the past five years, gives an average of $12,000 to $22,000, depending on which county, to help a low-income family stay in their home. That's a fraction of the roughly $50,000 the state spends on a person once they become homeless.

The remaining three programs, which have received a total of $9.4 billion since 2020, couldn't be evaluated due to a lack of data.

Democratic state Sen. Dave Cortese, who requested the audit last year after touring a large homeless encampment in San Jose, said the report depicts “a data desert” and shows an unsettling lack of transparency at every level.

Republican state Sen. Roger Niello said the lack of accountability is troubling.

“California is facing a concerning paradox: despite an exorbitant amount of dollars spent, the state’s homeless population is not slowing down,” Niello said in a statement. “These audit results are a wake-up call for a shift toward solutions that prioritize self-sufficiency and cost effectiveness.”

Newsom has made tackling homelessness a top priority, and the growing crisis is sure to dog him should he ever set his sights on a national elected office. He has pushed for laws that make it easier to force people with behavioral health issues into treatment, and he campaigned aggressively for a proposition that voters passed in March that imposes strict requirements on counties to spend on housing and drug treatment programs to help tackle the state’s homelessness crisis.




Just another example of how far California has sunk under the leadership of Newsom. It's their mess let them figure it out themselves.

The short version.

Login to view embedded media

It is great to be an Iowa Wrestling fan.

Go Hawks!

or both basketball and football will die a slow death. Basketball is basically there. I send money monthly to the Swarm, but we need our AD to cultivate some big money.

Fox News host Jesse Watters says President Biden has no idea how to relate to everyday Americans, especially Black Americans, on "Jesse Watters Primetime."

JESSE WATTERS: Biden shuffled up to the podium and bragged about everything he's done for Black Americans: Rebuilding races, highways, keeping ObamaCare, and of course, saving the planet.

Joe has no clue how to relate to any American, let alone Black Americans. Nobody has time for electric buses or racist highways, and you can't take credit for ObamaCare. It has your boss's name on it. Biden didn't even have the guts to show up in person. Obama was there, and he didn't need any help with the Black vote. It's called retail politics. You show up, shake hands, show people you're real.

Nobody is taking this administration seriously. CNN searched day and night to find Biden superfans. Even they're laughing at them. ... We're laughing, too. Today, we're finding out Biden's campaign put up a job posting for a new DEI director: $120 grand a year, if anybody's interested. No amount of DEI is going to dig Biden out of this hole. He either needs to start being honest with voters or he needs to hustle off the stage.

Surely this could only happen in the Bizarro World?

San Francisco Making It Illegal For Stores To Close
In a groundbreaking move that’s sending shockwaves through the business community, San Francisco is considering a law that would make it illegal for grocery stores to close without six months’ notice. This unprecedented step, if enacted, would fundamentally change the dynamics of business ownership and operation in the city.

A Closer Look
The proposed law mandates that grocery stores will be required to give a six month notice before they close their doors permanently.
In addition they need to be proactive in finding a replacement store so as to not disrupt access to essentials for residents. This initiative aims to protect the city's economic well being and access to essential services.

Locals Respond
This proposal comes at a time when President Biden has criticized grocery store pricing, accusing corporations of burdening American families with the increased prices.
While the Biden administration is trying to pressure food retailers to reduce prices, San Francisco’s response is to implement regulations aimed at preserving the accessibility of essential goods for its residents.



Critics Argue
Critics contend that the decision to do this represents a dangerous erosion of business autonomy, with the government imposing on business operations and exit strategies.
By forcing mandates that require businesses to give prolonged notice before closing could potentially discourage entrepreneurship and investment in San Francisco.

Consequences For Business Owners
For business owners, specifically those that are in the retail industry, the possible law represents a significant shift in the regulatory environment.
Additionally, it underscores the difficulties that could be faced by small businesses that are trying to navigate the challenges while still remaining competitive.

Economic Shifts
This legislation is situated with a broader context that includes concerns about rising crime rates, regulatory burdens, and a shift in economic dynamics, especially in urban centers like San Francisco.
The city’s grapple with crime, homelessness, and economic inequality have gotten much worse in the last few years, urging policymakers to seek out more unconventional solutions to address these matters.

Policy Trends
San Francisco’s proposed legislation reflects a much larger trend in policies attempting to reshape the business environment in the nation.
As governments struggle with socioeconomic challenges, individuals can expect to see more interventions aimed at balancing economic interests with social welfare concerns.

Changes In The Business Climate
During a time where the regulatory landscape is constantly evolving, owners of businesses need to adjust their strategies to navigate this turbulent terrain.
This also means evaluating what is doable in terms of operations in highly regulated environments, diversifying revenue streams, and seeking out unique business models that are focused on resilience and sustainability.