ADVERTISEMENT

Congress stripped IRS of another $20 billion in government shutdown fight

Deplorable:

Congress revoked an additional $20 billion from the Internal Revenue Service last week when lawmakers averted a government shutdown, a cut that may undo many of President Joe Biden’s efforts to improve customer service at the tax agency and train fresh scrutiny on wealthy tax cheats.

Biden and congressional Democrats gave the IRS $80 billion in the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act, but Congress rescinded $20 billion as part of a 2023 budget deal. Shortly afterward, Republicans vowed they’d be back for more IRS cuts.

And because of the way lawmakers extended government funding into March, an additional $20 billion in cuts came automatically.
When Congress approved a stopgap funding bill, called a continuing resolution, all the existing policy from the previous fiscal year was carried forward unless new text was specifically added to the bill to change it. There was no language in the bill to undo last year’s cut, so it repeated in the new law.


Critics of the IRS were pleased.

“We obviously think the increased money from the [Inflation Reduction Act] for IRS agents was a declared shakedown on taxpayers to pay for Democrats’ spending,” said Michael Palicz, director of tax policy for the anti-tax group Americans for Tax Reform. “Republicans have taken a huge chunk out of this before, and we have a chance to do that again.”
But Biden administration officials said the additional cuts would add $140 billion to the national debt over the next decade by hamstringing the agency’s ability to audit wealthy individuals and large corporations.
The agency will conduct 400 fewer audits of major businesses each year, Biden administration officials said, and 1,200 fewer audits of high-income individuals.

More cuts would also force the IRS to dramatically reduce customer service for taxpayers, Deputy Treasury Secretary Wally Adeyemo said last month. By 2026, the IRS would have enough resources to answer only two of every 10 phone calls to customer helplines, and wait times would increase to 28 minutes on average.

ADVERTISING

“Not only would you be in a position where we don’t have the money to go after the people who are trying to deliberately cheat and not pay their taxes, but we also wouldn’t have the resources to help the people who are trying to pay their taxes and make it more efficient,” Adeyemo said.

The new money from the Inflation Reduction Act funding vastly improved the IRS’s operations, according to the agency’s inspector general. Before the additional resources kicked in, the agency had a mountain of 24 million backlogged paper tax returns; within a year of receiving the funding boost, that was almost eradicated, the agency reported.

In the 2022 filing season, months before Congress approved the law, only 10 percent of taxpayer phone calls were ever connected to a live representative — if callers stayed on the line through sometimes hours-long waits. The IRS now answers more than 85 percent of taxpayer calls with a wait of less than three minutes, Adeyemo said.

Corporate Donations to Trumps Inauguration

Interesting

  • Meta: donated $1 million
  • Amazon: plans to donate $1 million
  • Sam Altman: plans to make a $1 million personal donation
  • Perplexity: plans to donate $1 million
  • Uber and Dara Khosrowshahi: donated $1 million each
  • Ken Griffin: plans to donate $1 million
  • Bank of America: plans to donate an undisclosed amount
  • Goldman Sachs: plans to donate an undisclosed amount
  • Robinhood: donated $2 million

New research shows the massive hole Dems are in.

Even voters who previously backed Democrats cast the party as weak and overly focused on diversity and elites.
Democrats conducting post-mortems on their sweeping losses in 2024 are finding more reason for alarm. And the problem isn’t just Kamala Harris or Joe Biden.


In a trio of focus groups, even voters who previously backed Democrats cast the party as weak and overly focused on diversity and elites, according to research by the progressive group Navigator Research.

When asked to compare the Democratic Party to an animal, one participant compared the party to an ostrich because “they’ve got their heads in the sand and are absolutely committed to their own ideas, even when they’re failing.” Another likened them to koalas, who “are complacent and lazy about getting policy wins that we really need.” Democrats, another said, are “not a friend of the working class anymore.”


The focus group research, shared first with POLITICO, represents the latest troubling pulse check for a party still sorting through the wreckage of its November losses and looking for a path to rebuild. Without a clear party leader and with losses across nearly every demographic in November,

Democrats are walking into a second Trump presidency without a unified strategy to improve their electoral prospects. And while some Democrats blame Biden, others blame inflation and still others blame “losing hold of culture,” the feedback from the focus groups found Democrats’ problems are even more widespread and potentially long-lasting than a single election cycle.

The focus groups offer “a pretty scathing rebuke” of the Democratic Party brand, said Rachael Russell, director of polling and analytics at Navigator Research, a project within the Hub Project, which is a Democratic nonprofit group.

“This weakness they see, [Democrats] not getting things done, not being able to actually fight for people — is something that needs to be figured out,” Russell said. “It might not be the message, it might be the policy. It might be something a little bit deeper that has to be addressed by the party.”

The focus groups — held immediately after the 2024 election and conducted by GBAO, a Democratic polling firm — featured three kinds of voters: young men in battleground states who voted for Biden in 2020 and Trump in 2024; voters in battleground states who voted for Biden in 2020 but didn’t vote at all in 2024; and voters in blue states who had previously voted for Democrats, a third party candidate or didn’t vote in 2020 but voted for Trump in 2024.


“I think what the Democratic elites and their politicians believe is often very different from what the average Democratic voter is,” said a Georgia man who voted for Biden in 2020 but Trump in 2024. “The elites that run the Democratic Party — I think they’re way too obsessed with appealing to these very far-left social progressivism that’s very popular on college campuses.”

These voters voiced cautious optimism about Trump’s second term, both in the focus groups and a post-election poll that found Trump’s highest approval rating since 2020 in a GBAO survey. The national poll, which surveyed 1,000 people, found 47 percent viewed Trump favorably, while 50 percent disapproved of him — the highest marks he’s received since he left office.

Russell argued that Trump’s high marks reflect a “honeymoon” period, which she predicted will fade once he takes office: “Once things start happening, it’s going to take a turn, and so it’s going to rely really heavily on the actions in the first 100 days to see how we go from here.”

She also noted that the polling suggests openings for Democrats on issues like abortion, health care and taxing the rich, as well as a fear that Trump may go too far on tariffs. Their survey also showed that two-thirds of voters said inflation should be the incoming president’s top issue, but only a third of voters believed it was Trump’s or Republicans’ top issue.

When the focus group participants were asked about inflation and tariffs, many of them said they didn’t fully understand the policy, while others acknowledged they expected prices to go up.

“Obviously I wouldn’t want stuff to go up, but at the same time, in the long run, would it be better off for America and maybe having more stuff made here?” said one man from Wisconsin.

90
  • Like
Reactions: Scruddy

SJSU responds to volleyball player mass exodus after trans athlete scandal rocked program

Online Image storage - thoughts and solutions?

Growing weary of a couple aspects of keeping a local hard drive and not having access to photos/files, esp with multiple sources needing to feed into a single database. Family count of phones and cameras now that the kids have their own phones.

Used photobucket when it was free, but didn't commit to them and when they started charging, I left. But since digital life is expanding, local non-backed up drives are getting tedious.

Anyone have good or bad stories and thoughts on what you are using? OneDrive, iCloud+, GooglePhotos?

I hate the thought of $30 / month for the rest of my life (Apple iCloud Premier), but to the point where Im looking to just push the easy button on some things.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT