You know, I thought the absurdity of it would make the point, but you help emphasize it.
Everyone agrees there is nothing redeemable about the Nazis, and they summoned their own doom.
The idea that they [Nazis or Hamas] should have been granted a ceasefire, and allowed to retain control, boggles my mind.
I haven’t seen anyone even try to justify keeping the murderers in power, even as they acknowledge they’ve undemocratically usurped power and hold the civilians of Gaza essentially as hostages.
I said that attacking Cuba for entering a military alliance is immoral, but I think JFK was in no small part trapped by politics in his decision.
Remember, he kind of ran to the right of Nixon on defense, and then had the Bay of Pigs dropped in his lap by the CIA out of the gate. Does he survive re-election if the Soviets put bases minutes from Florida? I doubt it.
I believe overall
Kennedy was moving in a very different direction than his predecessors.
But you don't have to see Soviet bases as a existential threat to JFK politically to agree they were viewed as an existential threat to the U.S. strategically.
It’s because I usually measure the efforts net negative for us, and usually the region of the globe we’re trying to save from itself too.
What’s been the net benefit from GHWB thru Biden committing us to wage wars in the Middle East? To show for it we have trillions in debt, 10s, if not 100s of thousands of physically and mentally injured, to go with thousands of our dead, and 100s of thousands of dead people in the Middle East.
What did we gain for that exactly?
To me there has been no net benefit, so I don’t want to spend the next three decades doing the same stupid wars, especially to keep a bunch of foreign kings on their thrones.
That shit is madness to me.
We absolutely don’t have to.
Not isolationist whatsoever.
I want trade and travel with the world.
What I don’t want is to try and nation build. Whether it’s Vietnam or Iraq, or Syria, or Libya, or Yemen, or Somalia, or… well, I hope you get the idea.