I can’t listen at the moment. In a nutshell, what is on this laptop that is so damning to Joe? Serious question…
I can’t listen at the moment. In a nutshell, what is on this laptop that is so damning to Joe? Serious question…
His son is a fvck up. That's the extent of it.I can’t listen at the moment. In a nutshell, what is on this laptop that is so damning to Joe? Serious question…
His son is a fvck up. That's the extent of it.
No, I honestly have not heard what the deal with it is. I was waiting for confirmation that it was real before I gave it any thought.If it was harmless why did the Biden Administration and every liberal media outlet lie about it? Why did Twitter confederates ban the NY Post story about it?
You tell me.
Nothing damning for Joe?His son is a fvck up. That's the extent of it.
No, I honestly have not heard what the deal with it is. I was waiting for confirmation that it was real before I gave it any thought.
His son was also doing international “business dealings” (selling access and influence?) and likely communicating to Joe throughout. There is likely more on that laptop than anyone wants to admit. Which is why it was so swiftly and harshly discredited with a media PsyOp campaign coordinated from the Biden campaign to media lackeys.
You’ve cracked the case! You should call the fed prosecutor and tell him that what’s on the laptop is proof of everything you’ve said here and there are 459 uncharged Biden crimes.
Call him now. The country needs your insights here!
So nobody knows what really is on there other than it is bad?One of the Hunter Biden laptop gaslighting lies from the media was that “the Russians could have put files on it and now it is tainted.”
Why would they do that?
To sow doubt about the legitimacy of the contents. That’s it.
The Biden campaign obviously thought there was damaging contents on that laptop. That’s why they lied about it.
“The Party is Always Right.”
Good substantive response.
What did the FBI agent testify today about the laptop? You can do it. I have faith.
Except the part where he was picking up bags of Chinese cash for the big guy.His son is a fvck up. That's the extent of it.
“Hines' first witness FBI agent Erika Jensen confirmed it belonged to Hunter in an admission that flew in the face of many who tried to discredit its contents as Russian disinformation.”
Talks about lies. You have no proof of this.His son was also doing international “business dealings” (selling access and influence?) and likely communicating to Joe throughout. There is likely more on that laptop than anyone wants to admit. Which is why it was so swiftly and harshly discredited with a media PsyOp campaign coordinated from the Biden campaign to media lackeys.
Why lie?
Why push the lie?
Why pressure twitter to target and lock accounts?
Fear.
I don't think anything about the laptop is damning to Joe. The fact that close to an election everything possible to downplay the laptop or to say it doesn't exist is what bothers people.I can’t listen at the moment. In a nutshell, what is on this laptop that is so damning to Joe? Serious question…
Rs have been saying for a long time that the laptop indicts Joe. Now you're claiming that it doesn't prove jack but the real problem is that the Dems said it's a nothing burger. Which is so far appears to be? Shouldn't the real problem be that the Rs lied about what it contained?I don't think anything about the laptop is damning to Joe. The fact that close to an election everything possible to downplay the laptop or to say it doesn't exist is what bothers people.
I'm not a "R". I've never once on this board said it was incriminating. The only thing it fully proves is Hunter is a grade A dumbass. My problem with corporate media and the Ds is they lied about its existence when in fact it did exist.Rs have been saying for a long time that the laptop indicts Joe. Now you're claiming that it doesn't prove jack but the real problem is that the Dems said it's a nothing burger. Which is so far appears to be? Shouldn't the real problem be that the Rs lied about what it contained?
Curious why youre blaming the Dems for this when it's the Rs who lied through their teeth this entire time.I'm not a "R". I've never once on this board said it was incriminating. The only thing it fully proves is Hunter is a grade A dumbass. My problem with corporate media and the Ds is they lied about its existence when in fact it did exist.
R's were at least half right. It does exist and it isn't Russian Disinformation. Ds straight up lied about it.Curious why youre blaming the Dems for this when it's the Rs who lied through their teeth this entire time.
Rs we're not half right. They claimed over and over it would prove that Joe is a criminal. So whether it exists or not is completely immaterial. It's like someone claiming that you have child pron on your phone and then saying, "See, I was half right," when it turns out to be regular pron.R's were at least half right. It does exist and it isn't Russian Disinformation. Ds straight up lied about it.
Long story short both parties suck, Ds and corporate media lied to the American public, and Rs are making a mountain out of a molehill.
P.S...... Ds aren't always 100% right and can be wrong and it's ok...... also it's ok to admit it as well
There were emails on the laptop that suggested Hunter was kicking back part of the money he made while working at Burisma and in China to Joe. The extreme effort to discredit the laptop suggests that he was doing just that.I don't think anything about the laptop is damning to Joe. The fact that close to an election everything possible to downplay the laptop or to say it doesn't exist is what bothers people.
@Huey GreyThere were emails on the laptop that suggested Hunter was kicking back part of the money he made while working at Burisma and in China to Joe. The extreme effort to discredit the laptop suggests that he was doing just that.
The real frightening thing about the whole situation is that the intelligence community was working so closely with the media, Facebook, YouTube, and dozen of other independent companies to circle the wagons around a political candidate. The Left can shout at the top of their lungs that Trump is a fascist, but this whole situation is real fascism.
Was the laptop used in court today or does it not exist?Rs we're not half right. They claimed over and over it would prove that Joe is a criminal. So whether it exists or not is completely immaterial. It's like someone claiming that you have child pron on your phone and then saying, "See, I was half right," when it turns out to be regular pron.
How are you this bad at this? It's existence is irrelevant if it doesn't contain actual damning information proving Joe as a criminal. It's stupid that you keep ignoring this crucial part.Was the laptop used in court today or does it not exist?
Suggested? Either the laptop contains concrete evidence or it does not. And we both know, there is no concrete proof.There were emails on the laptop that suggested Hunter was kicking back part of the money he made while working at Burisma and in China to Joe. The extreme effort to discredit the laptop suggests that he was doing just that.
The real frightening thing about the whole situation is that the intelligence community was working so closely with the media, Facebook, YouTube, and dozen of other independent companies to circle the wagons around a political candidate. The Left can shout at the top of their lungs that Trump is a fascist, but this whole situation is real fascism.
Joe was not on trial and the information on the laptop would only be used in a case against Hunter. Since the case against Hunter is for violating gun laws, unless there is evidence on the laptop that support the charges, there is no reason to enter it into evidence.How are you this bad at this? It's existence is irrelevant if it doesn't contain actual damning information proving Joe as a criminal. It's stupid that you keep ignoring this crucial part.
It's stupid you won't admit that Democrats told us it didn't exist when it did. I said I didn't think anything was damning to Joe. Why are you coming at me like I'm the resident Republican gatekeeper? I am acknowledging 2 facts.......How are you this bad at this? It's existence is irrelevant if it doesn't contain actual damning information proving Joe as a criminal. It's stupid that you keep ignoring this crucial part.
Yes, suggested. There isn't an email that explicitly states "I, Hunter Biden am paying kickbacks to my father, Vice President Joe Biden, from money I've made in Ukraine and China." There are emails that suggest that is what he was doing.Suggested? Either the laptop contains concrete evidence or it does not. And we both know, there is no concrete proof.
So the prosecutors are sitting on evidence to indict the president but are choosing to sit on it? That makes zero senseJoe was not on trial and the information on the laptop would only be used in a case against Hunter. Since the case against Hunter is for violating gun laws, unless there is evidence on the laptop that support the charges, there is no reason to enter it into evidence.
Oh no, Hunter has a laptop. So what? I have a laptop. Everyone does. The laptop you're referring to one is the laptop that ties all of this to the president. And that laptop does not exist. But keep spinning.It's stupid you won't admit that Democrats told us it didn't exist when it did. I said I didn't think anything was damning to Joe. Why are you coming at me like I'm the resident Republican gatekeeper? I am acknowledging 2 facts.......
Fact #1 Rs were right it existed but may be wrong about its contents
Fact #2 Ds, corporate media, and social media told everyone with a TV and phone it did not exist and it was Russian Disinformation.
You are so blinded by your political party tribal brain you can't admit fact #2 is in fact a fact
Link these damning emails?Yes, suggested. There isn't an email that explicitly states "I, Hunter Biden am paying kickbacks to my father, Vice President Joe Biden, from money I've made in Ukraine and China." There are emails that suggest that is what he was doing.
As stated in my most recent post, this case against Hunter is for violating gun laws, not for his father's political corruption. That trial will never happen. I know it will never happen because 54 former intelligence community personnel including three former heads of the CIA wrote a letter claiming a news story they knew to be factual was a Russian plant. And the media went along with their lie to protect the political career of an old, braindead, corrupted Washington insider.
Interestingly, the video montage debunked the idea that people could not find the story after the NY Post article link was censored on Twitter and FB. Numerous mainstream shows had a story about the original article provider and who had censored access.
Fox News lies.