ADVERTISEMENT

2022-2023 PG Starter

Who you got?

  • Ulis

    Votes: 44 18.1%
  • Toussaint

    Votes: 91 37.4%
  • Bowen

    Votes: 79 32.5%
  • CMac

    Votes: 21 8.6%
  • Someone else

    Votes: 15 6.2%

  • Total voters
    243
Who do I think? Joe T

who do I think it should be? Someone not on the roster (whether that’s Bowen or a transfer.)
 
That guard grouping is not good enough to get iowa where they want to be. The only guy who might become a guy to worry about for the other team is Tony Perkins. And to do that, he's gonna have to jump some levels. There were way too many games last year where our guards were God awful. I don't expect much consistency from them next year either. Guard play has been pretty mediocre during Frans time at iowa. Guards matter most in March.
 
Maybe I’m misunderstanding your argument, but are you denying Fran used Marble at the point?
No, what I said was he was not a PG and that's true. Combo guard, sure but most guards today are. That's not what he was recurited to be, nor was drafted/played pro as. Different players through Frans era have brought the ball up and had PG duties here an there but that doesnt make them a PG. Perkins borught the ball up at times this year but I dont see anyone calling him a PG.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BlackNGoldBleeder
I know this is a pipe dream, but I hope the starter is a stud transfer or an All-American they snatch from the JUCO ranks.

Something.

Unless by some unforeseen miracle Keegan chooses to come back (lol), I’m having a hard time caring about Iowa basketball right now. I want to care, but nothing on paper suggests anything but significant regression will occur next year. As you rightly point out, Bowen (and Dix) won’t be ready to contribute significantly, all our guards outside of Kris (if he even comes back) will be average at best, and our front court will consist of PMac, Rebraca, Josh O, and Mulvey. Yuck.

Just a question ... did you feel the same way caring about Iowa basketball last year after Luka and Wieskamp went to the NBA and Nunge and CJ transferred?

I understand your thought process. Most of the teams in the tournament look very athletic compared to Iowa and emphasize defense in a way we have not seen under Fran. However, Iowa's teams have been entertaining and they seem to come up with players who are under recruited to come and play above expectations.

I believe Fran is who he is and the program is what it is under him. However, I am hoping that some of the incoming players (including maybe a player or two we don't know yet) can come in and make us feel like Iowa is continuing to be competitive in the Big 10. I would not mind a change in the coaching staff to have some different voices, but I am not sure that will happen at this point.

The real question is ... can this program take that next step with more than one win in the NCAA Tourney? I think it is fun to think it is possible ... no matter how hard it is to see now.

I also understand if someone disagrees. No hard feelings. :)
 
Good news is that Fran indicated this week that Dix should be ready to go next fall.
Perk can handle the ball well enough to play pg in short stretches.
Joe and Ulis give us good depth at PG.
 
  • Like
Reactions: perryhawk
Ulis seems to be the odd man out right now. Somewhat surprising due to his HS accolades and bloodlines. I thought we were getting a serviceable PG who may not start right away, but had the talents to eventually play decent minutes in the conference. He hasn't shot the ball well, although his defense has been pretty good. Have to wonder if he'll stick around with another PG coming in.
 
Good news is that Fran indicated this week that Dix should be ready to go next fall.
Perk can handle the ball well enough to play pg in short stretches.
Joe and Ulis give us good depth at PG.
I didn't catch that but it is great news, if nothing else than for the kid's health. Pretty nasty injury.
 
No, what I said was he was not a PG and that's true. Combo guard, sure but most guards today are. That's not what he was recurited to be, nor was drafted/played pro as. Different players through Frans era have brought the ball up and had PG duties here an there but that doesnt make them a PG. Perkins borught the ball up at times this year but I dont see anyone calling him a PG.
Gotcha. And I agree.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Smigamorski
Ulis seems to be the odd man out right now. Somewhat surprising due to his HS accolades and bloodlines. I thought we were getting a serviceable PG who may not start right away, but had the talents to eventually play decent minutes in the conference. He hasn't shot the ball well, although his defense has been pretty good. Have to wonder if he'll stick around with another PG coming in.
Ulis is a Jr next year with the potential for anothe Covid-19 year. Even if he isn’t a starter, he will be playing quite a bit at the 1-2 with Joe and Tony. Those 3 give Iowa a very good defensive backcourt . If he gets his offense on track (he was pretty good offensively in HS), he could eventually start over Joe. He's long, rebounds well, and is a very good ball handler. I think he'll stick with Iowa but who knows.
 
  • Like
Reactions: perryhawk
Youre pretty delusional if you think Bowen will be the starter day 1.
Gesell was probably Fran's last top PG prospect he landed, and he did start from Day 1. The talent has been upgraded from Fran's first few teams, but I still wouldn't be surprised to see Bowen take the reins pretty early on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: perryhawk
I did enjoy Perkins being the lead ballhandler down the stretch for us. I thought he did some good things.
I think Perkins is the best option at PG. Joe T was great off bench. I expect Bowen to push for playing time.

Start Sandfort at the SG position.

PG- Perkins
SG- Sandfort
F- Patrick
F- Kris
C- Transfer

PG2- Joe T
SG- Dix or Perkins in certain situations
G- Connor
F- Rebraca
C- Mulvey or Ogundele

I worry about scoring in the second unit. That was the one huge benefit of Kris coming off bench in second unit.
 
I think Perkins is the best option at PG. Joe T was great off bench. I expect Bowen to push for playing time.

Start Sandfort at the SG position.

PG- Perkins
SG- Sandfort
F- Patrick
F- Kris
C- Transfer

PG2- Joe T
SG- Dix or Perkins in certain situations
G- Connor
F- Rebraca
C- Mulvey or Ogundele

I worry about scoring in the second unit. That was the one huge benefit of Kris coming off bench in second unit.
Perkins is not our starting point guard next year. Not a chance in Hell. He's a 2 guard or a small forward, nowhere close to our starting point guard.
 
Perkins is not our starting point guard next year. Not a chance in Hell. He's a 2 guard or a small forward, nowhere close to our starting point guard.
I agree. If Cmac returns and with Jbo gone it's probably more likely that Cmac play point than Tony. I wouldn't be too surprised to see a lineup of:

1 Cmac/Joe
2 Tony/Ulis
3 Pmac/Sandfort
4 Kris/Sandfort
5 Rebraca/Josh

It will be interesting to see what happens portal-wise over the next couple months.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mohawkeye
In this thread, I've seen the term "capable of bringing the ball up" being used interchangeably with PG. I mean, if the other team isn't pressuring, most guys can "bring the ball up". However, for the opponents that want to heat you up, there is a different level involved. There is also a big difference between a combo that is primarily handling the ball and a true PG (which is getting rarer and rarer to find). Similarly, being able to shoot the 3 does not make one a SG. You have to be able to guard the other team's SG.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bulldogs1974
Ulis is a Jr next year with the potential for anothe Covid-19 year. Even if he isn’t a starter, he will be playing quite a bit at the 1-2 with Joe and Tony. Those 3 give Iowa a very good defensive backcourt . If he gets his offense on track (he was pretty good offensively in HS), he could eventually start over Joe. He's long, rebounds well, and is a very good ball handler. I think he'll stick with Iowa but who knows.
Good ball handler?!?! Not when he does his signature chest high dribbles.
 
And lol @ cmac on that list
You laugh, but Fran trusts Cmac more than anyone else on the team. He was the first man off the bench during the final stretch of the season. With Jbo gone the door is now slightly open for Fran to insert him back into the starting lineup. You know he's not going to start him over Kris, Pmac, Perk or Filip so....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bulldogs1974
I just want Fran to hand the freakin keys to Joe T. Drives me nuts
 
I agree. If Cmac returns and with Jbo gone it's probably more likely that Cmac play point than Tony. I wouldn't be too surprised to see a lineup of:

1 Cmac/Joe
2 Tony/Ulis
3 Pmac/Sandfort
4 Kris/Sandfort
5 Rebraca/Josh

It will be interesting to see what happens portal-wise over the next couple months.
Agreed. CMac before Tony at the point, although not necessarily starting ahead of Joe. CMac started at PG two years ago before Nunge got hurt and Fran moved him to the 4.

It's hard to imagine CMac returning for a sixth season unless it's finally to be the point guard. Probably won't happen, though, unless Joe and/or Aron leaves.
 
Agreed. CMac before Tony at the point, although not necessarily starting ahead of Joe. CMac started at PG two years ago before Nunge got hurt and Fran moved him to the 4.

It's hard to imagine CMac returning for a sixth season unless it's finally to be the point guard. Probably won't happen, though, unless Joe and/or Aron leaves.
Who's Aron?
 
Agreed. CMac before Tony at the point, although not necessarily starting ahead of Joe. CMac started at PG two years ago before Nunge got hurt and Fran moved him to the 4.

It's hard to imagine CMac returning for a sixth season unless it's finally to be the point guard. Probably won't happen, though, unless Joe and/or Aron leaves.
I kind of see it the other way. I think Cmac coming back might push Joe or more likely Ulis out the door as they see the writing on the wall and are looking for more playing time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bulldogs1974
Perkins is not a point guard but is "serviceable" bringing it upcourt against moderate or light pressure. He is pretty good driving to the hole. His game would translate really well if he were about 6'6"
I think Tony plays SG pretty well at 6'4". He is more of a combo guard at that, but he is a very strong driver who can make teams pay when they sag off of him. He can rebound with the best. I think we are just seeing him scratch the surface of what he can do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mohawkeye
I kind of see it the other way. I think Cmac coming back might push Joe or more likely Ulis out the door as they see the writing on the wall and are looking for more playing time.
That's possible, too. But because it would be for a sixth season, I'm inclined to think it's more likely CMac would be pulled back rather than pushing someone else out. Unless Fran doesn't think any of the other three (Joe, Ahron, or Bowen) is capable of leading the team at point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BBHawk
That's possible, too. But because it would be for a sixth season, I'm inclined to think it's more likely CMac would be pulled back rather than pushing someone else out. Unless Fran doesn't think any of the other three (Joe, Ahron, or Bowen) is capable of leading the team at point.
If Fran thinks 6th year Connor at 2 pts, 1 rebound 1assist a game and a “coach on the floor” should be our starting pt guard next year he should be fired immediately. And both Ulis and Joe should transfer.
 
If Fran thinks 6th year Connor at 2 pts, 1 rebound 1assist a game and a “coach on the floor” should be our starting pt guard next year he should be fired immediately. And both Ulis and Joe should transfer.
I doubt both would transfer. I would also be surprised if both stayed I guess. As I understand it, Joe and Patrick are close or is that not correct?
 
That's possible, too. But because it would be for a sixth season, I'm inclined to think it's more likely CMac would be pulled back rather than pushing someone else out. Unless Fran doesn't think any of the other three (Joe, Ahron, or Bowen) is capable of leading the team at point.
Who would be shocked by that.
 
I kind of see it the other way. I think Cmac coming back might push Joe or more likely Ulis out the door as they see the writing on the wall and are looking for more playing time.
CMac rarely comes in to replace a guard - he generally replaces a wing. I can't remember him being on the floor without at least one of Jordan, Joe, Ahron or Tony, and usually 2 of them. With Jordan definitely gone next year, if CMac comes back, he'll probably see more time backing up PMac and Kris. Iowa is going to need all the minutes that Tony, Joe and Ahron can give.
 
CMac rarely comes in to replace a guard - he generally replaces a wing. I can't remember him being on the floor without at least one of Jordan, Joe, Ahron or Tony, and usually 2 of them. With Jordan definitely gone next year, if CMac comes back, he'll probably see more time backing up PMac and Kris. Iowa is going to need all the minutes that Tony, Joe and Ahron can give.
I think Connor’s great value is that he’s an all purpose player….he did typically come in for one of the forwards, he guarded guys in the post (just rewatched MSU game and he played some defense against Bingham and did pretty well) and on occasion played some at guard. Having a utility guy on your bench is extremely valuable for a coach….especially someone as unselfish as Connor.
 
CMac rarely comes in to replace a guard - he generally replaces a wing. I can't remember him being on the floor without at least one of Jordan, Joe, Ahron or Tony, and usually 2 of them. With Jordan definitely gone next year, if CMac comes back, he'll probably see more time backing up PMac and Kris. Iowa is going to need all the minutes that Tony, Joe and Ahron can give.
You're correct on that. Connor spent most of this season backing up Pmac and to a lesser extent Keegan. There were very limited minutes available at the point between JBO and Joe. That changes with Jbo leaving. Cmac's lack of offense doesn't lend itself towards the 2 and Perkins solidified his spot there so his minutes are likely increasing. Cmac's lack of size is a disadvantage inside and we can assume that Kris, Pmac and Sandfort's minutes are all going up at the 3 and 4. If Fran lands a big that locks up the 5 spot. That's why it wouldn't surprise me if Fran played Cmac at the point. He hasn't shown all that much trust in Joe to date and Connor's two strongest traits are passing and ball security. Fran trusts his decision making more than anyone else on the team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CookyMonster
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT