ADVERTISEMENT

A maniac is running U.S. foreign policy

"a bit carried away" is accurate. It's a situation like this when the term "fear-mongering" actually has some merit. Usually it doesn't.

Here's her summary with my clarification from the article in parentheses:
----------------------------------
To review:

-- When the president's immigration policy is to promote international communism: The president wins. (Clinton sent Elian Gonzales back to Cuba and the courts said they couldn't do anything about it)

-- When the president's immigration policy is to transform America into a different country: The president wins. (Obama wanted to let everyone in, according to her)

-- But when the president's immigration policy is to protect Americans: Some piss-ant judge announces that his authority exceeds that of the president. (Where we are today)

This is exactly what I warned you about in Adios, America: The Left's Plan to Turn Our Country into a Third World Hellhole
ir
. (Um, yes, she's "a bit carried away")
-----------------------------------
 
-- But when the president's immigration policy is to protect Americans: Some piss-ant judge announces that his authority exceeds that of the president. (Where we are today)

This comment reflects a complete lack of understanding of Judge Robart's TRO and conveniently ignores the concept of "checks and balances."
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT