Jesus H. That picture gave me the creeps. What the hell is that on the Right?
![mqdefault.jpg](/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fi2.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FQihkWmS7dTI%2Fmqdefault.jpg&hash=836b5e1852ea2e7e050d06b9c6035449)
Jesus H. That picture gave me the creeps. What the hell is that on the Right?
Jenna Ellis is thankful this embarrassment is here.In reality, Jabba should probably be defending a shoplifter or jaywalker.
When did Ozzy get a news/talk show?Jesus H. That picture gave me the creeps. What the hell is that on the Right?
I wonder why they wouldn't allow this as evidence of Carroll being an outright whacko lol shame that the outfit she allegedly wore when trump assaulted her didn't come out until years later. She's an obvious fraud.
'Obvious'? It's cute when you try soooooo hard scruffy 🤣.
I wonder why they wouldn't allow this as evidence of Carroll being an outright whacko lol shame that the outfit she allegedly wore when trump assaulted her didn't come out until years later. She's an obvious fraud.
"She made it up"“She was asking for it”……really original stuff Ryan
The Founders never envisioned such a rogue or scallywag being the president, but they put in a fail safe. They just didn’t envision a broken 2 party system where the House and Senate wouldn’t impeach such a scallywag.he's not just the worst president but one of the worst americans ever. Especially if apply: know better, do better.
One side benefit for Turd...be pretty easy to claim "ineffective counsel" on appeal.
The worst law student in my class could smoke her ass. And trust me, we had some laughable idiots.Spears has talent. Habba is a 3rd string lawyer. Spears seems more balanced mentally, too.
What's the chance they're sleeping with each other?
What does that prove?
I wonder why they wouldn't allow this as evidence of Carroll being an outright whacko lol shame that the outfit she allegedly wore when trump assaulted her didn't come out until years later. She's an obvious fraud.
So what you are all saying is that Trump lost this case on a bunch of procedural nonsense? That courtroom and the Deep State do seem to have a lot in common.
Was there any evidence that the underlying incident actually happened? This woman is clearly looney tunes and has been regularly creative, in writing her books. The subject matter of her books is not a lot different from what she dreamed up here.
Her first lawyer committed malpractice when he failed to bring her columns and her books into the case. Those books should have been required reading for everyone involved. This lawyer is much better, but noticeably hamstrung by nuance that only the judge apparently can see.
Jesus H. That picture gave me the creeps. What the hell is that on the Right?
Is it worth explaining to you that this was purely about the punishment phase, and Trump was already found guilty? Is it worth explaining to you the testimony from the first trial that the jury based their decision on? Is it worth explaining to you that if you lose one case, your best course of action is to STFU? Is it worth explaining to you that you should hire good lawyers, not just ones that look good in a two piece lounging beside the pool at Mar A Lago?So what you are all saying is that Trump lost this case on a bunch of procedural nonsense? That courtroom and the Deep State do seem to have a lot in common.
Was there any evidence that the underlying incident actually happened? This woman is clearly looney tunes and has been regularly creative, in writing her books. The subject matter of her books is not a lot different from what she dreamed up here.
Her first lawyer committed malpractice when he failed to bring her columns and her books into the case. Those books should have been required reading for everyone involved. This lawyer is much better, but noticeably hamstrung by nuance that only the judge apparently can see.
This is embarrassingSo what you are all saying is that Trump lost this case on a bunch of procedural nonsense? That courtroom and the Deep State do seem to have a lot in common.
Was there any evidence that the underlying incident actually happened? This woman is clearly looney tunes and has been regularly creative, in writing her books. The subject matter of her books is not a lot different from what she dreamed up here.
Her first lawyer committed malpractice when he failed to bring her columns and her books into the case. Those books should have been required reading for everyone involved. This lawyer is much better, but noticeably hamstrung by nuance that only the judge apparently can see.
Appellate work is typically a different skill set, so he shouldn’t. But I think the only skill set he looks for is someone who argues loudly with the judge and in front of the cameras. So he’ll probably stick with her.So does Trump rehire her for appeal if he can somehow scrounge up the money for escrow?
Result of selective intake of news.This is embarrassing
Absolutely and most of our whys.Result of selective intake of news.
Sounds like she was way in over her head. But he's probably banging her, so unless he can find a better hotter lawyer to bang at the appellate level, his dick, just as it did with his raping, will do the talking.Appellate work is typically a different skill set, so he shouldn’t. But I think the only skill set he looks for is someone who argues loudly with the judge and in front of the cameras. So he’ll probably stick with her.
Dry those tears, bins. You can start a ¡bOtH sIdEs! thread any time.
Dry those tears, bins. You can start a ¡bOtH sIdEs! thread any time.