All I did was remind them of who they are and what they represent. Oh well. I didn't use any profanity. Oh well. I suppose they deserve better.
Already got banned by BWI.
- Thread starter ConvenientParking
- Start date
I hate these c-words. Their fans are by far the worst fans in the east division. Justice after their scandal would have been permanent relegation to the MAC. They still don't deserve to be a Big Ten school. They are PA trash.
If you aren't banned at BWI you're doing it wrong.
And this was the opening shot on BTN tonight...
Hello, PedoBear...
Hello, PedoBear...
They like to think that they're a classy fanbase. They did win a lot of games with a morally compromised FB staff. It'd be refreshing if they abandoned the morally flawed years of Joe Paterno.
Seems adolescent to be proud of being banned.
Why do you think penn state fans are trash? Because we don't like being called pedofile enablers? Really? I would think that someone who was ok with that label would be more concerning, but I guess we all have a right to our opinions.
If you don't want to be called a pedophile enabler then don't enable pedophiles. Simple really.
We don't, which is why we find this offensive.
I didn't say anything lewd. I'm not proud of it. BWI was notoriously sensitive before the scandal.
It's tricky to rock a rhyme. You could disown Paterno, but you won't. He knew longer than he led on.
Funny how the legal system has pretty much determined that your favorite narrative is incorrect. Nobody enabled Sandusky. Apologies if that doesn't fit your hateful diatribe...try to keep up next time.
Because a large majority of your fans would rather make retarded excuses for Joe and company, rather than face the truth of what they were. That's not all of the PSU fan base, of course. But a large portion of the message board fans. I don't blame the PSU fans for what transpired with Sandusky. That wouldn't be fair.
Really? Turning a blind eye to a pedophile while he assaults kids for the better part of 4 decades is the definition of enabling him.
Maybe that's true. Other accounts of the situation suggest that Paterno was well aware. Funny how the legal system in PA takes multiple decades to work. There were allegations in the 90s. And Paterno had to know about them.
You've obviously never read the insanity at BWI.
Paterno is dead, so I can't say what he knew or didn't know. What is now known is that Sandusky was investigated prior to the campus incident and no charges were filed from that investigation. Take that however you'd like, but prior to 2011, he was thought to be a pillar of the community...he fooled a lot of people for a long time.
You can dare to suspect that Paterno knew more than what came to light in 2011. You'd be foolish to believe otherwise.
It's part of the record that Sandusky was investigated and not charged prior to 2001, so what's your point. 2011 was the first time he was charged. He was a pillar in the community, so is it really such a mental stretch to get that he fooled a lot of people?
Yes and no. He's on record admitting he sugar-coated some of his descriptions. As for where it went, they reported it to at least one outside source, so if it truly was the coverup you so want it to be, it was very poorly conceived.
No. They said they told The Second Mile. Which was Sandusky's charity. Which is laughable on so many levels.
A 14 year old kid told Joe Paterno that Sanduskyt assaulted him in 1976. So....yeah, I'd say Joe had received some early reports on Sandusky's hobbies.
They reported it to Dr. Jack Raykoviz, head of Sandusky's charity and a mandated reporter. Dr. Raykoviz apparently did not feel it met the criteria of being reported, yet has faced no charges for his inaction. Apparently, his is not as salacious a story as mighty Penn Sate.
STFU. They're supposed to say it. Their resistance is impressive, but at some point they're going to have to be truthful.
Yep, the same kid who also reported that he also told his story to an assistant coach who wouldn't be on the staff for several years after his alleged incident. Of course you knew that because you've "followed the case."
Link that identifies those two stories with the same person. I expect that link to name him. I'll wait.
Mandatory* reporter. This sounds like money laundering. Placement, layering, integration. Nobody around to take responsibility when things go south. Just the perp and none of the others who could have prevented a few. I don't hold Nitt fans responsible, but some more acknowledgment of the situation might be in order. Maybe less JoePa worship.
The claim we're both referring to comes from an insurance company and is not based in any official legal proceedings.
Latest posts
-
-
-
-
Payton Sandfort Named to Wooden Award Top 50 Preseason Watch List- Latest: Eliot Clough
-