There's the historical Jesus who is pretty famous. That's one reason.
I know that Jesus was a person. As a historian I cannot deny that. But I don't have to believe the rest of made up garbage in most religions
There's the historical Jesus who is pretty famous. That's one reason.
You might be right but for me it also provides a pretty good framework for living your life in the here an now. If you abide by the teachings of Jesus you’ll probably do alright 😁Is there any reason to believe in religion other than the possibility of having an afterlife? I believe this is the main reason that folks have faith.
I know that Jesus was a person. As a historian I cannot deny that. But I don't have to believe the rest of made up garbage in most religions
You might be right but for me it also provides a pretty good framework for living your life in the here an now. If you abide by the teachings of Jesus you’ll probably do alright 😁
The core of most religions is the Golden Rule. It seems pretty interesting that all the main religions teach that.
Is there any reason to believe in religion other than the possibility of having an afterlife? I believe this is the main reason that folks have faith.
Actually noSo, if you’re born in the wrong part of the globe and into the wrong religion, or died prior to 30 AD, you’re just ****ed?
If there's life after death seems to be a huge factor to the human condition considering we're not going to live past 120.
If there's no life after death then life is futile. Many philosophers believed this like Albert Camus and Arthur Schopenhauer.
If there's a bad life after death, that's even worse. If there's a good life after death, that changes the calculation.
I don’t believe that.
But you may if you like
When you die, you are dead. Nothing. A grave at best.
OkI don't need a religion to tell me not to be an asshole.
So what?Yep, and they believed in suicide bombings every bit as much as you believe that…
Ok…You’re not very good with logic or critical thinking. Nor reading comprehension.
Take organized religion out of the discussion for a moment. I love Plato’s Theory of Forms and the Cave. As a young man, my own agnosticism drove me nuts because I knew there was an answer and I had to shit or get off the pot. I felt there was more than just this mortal life. Plato described the same concept with the shadows. The Matrix explained it with the blue pill/red pill concept. We all joke today about “simulations” and other dimensions.Is there any reason to believe in religion other than the possibility of having an afterlife? I believe this is the main reason that folks have faith.
My bad dawg. Didn’t take the time to go through whole thread as I was late to the party.You Pepsi’d me in a thread?
Agree! To think that a baby is born in sin and would not return to heaven because it wasn’t baptized is ludicrous. That is a false interpretation of the Bible. Being baptized means you enter into a covenant and babies can’t enter into a convent, hence a false doctrine. Lastly, that was never taught, it’s man’s interpretation.That’s one of the more ridiculous beliefs in the Bible, and that’s saying something.
You're never going to find out the truth though, if you're right.
Those who believe there is no afterlife will not be alive to know they were right. Those who believe there is an afterlife will not be alive to know if they were right. Unless ... there is an afterlife. If there is a heaven and hell, then only after death will that be realized. I can see how those with "faith" would want to hedge their bets. If they are wrong, they will never know it. If they are right, they go to heaven. Those who don't believe will lose if they are wrong and go to hell.
Personally I don't believe and I prefer to live my life the way that I want. If I didn't, not living how I believe would be my downside. If I'm wrong, going to hell will be my downside. I'm ok with that bet.
Take organized religion out of the discussion for a moment. I love Plato’s Theory of Forms and the Cave. As a young man, my own agnosticism drove me nuts because I knew there was an answer and I had to shit or get off the pot. I felt there was more than just this mortal life. Plato described the same concept with the shadows. The Matrix explained it with the blue pill/red pill concept. We all joke today about “simulations” and other dimensions.
What if that is true? You’re living in a world that is broken and not what the real world was meant to be?
I like CS Lewis’s quote, “If I find in myself desires which nothing in this world can satisfy, the only logical explanation is that I was made for another world.”
When was the last time you were totally and 100% satisfied and never longed for more Jimmy?
I’ll let it slide. Just keep on sinning brother, we wouldn’t want to let JC down.My bad dawg. Didn’t take the time to go through whole thread as I was late to the party.
I know.I'm not saying I'm right and believers are wrong. I just don't want to be one that walks through the motions of being "something" that I don't believe in. To me, faking it is worse than not believing
Those who believe there is no afterlife will not be alive to know they were right. Those who believe there is an afterlife will not be alive to know if they were right. Unless ... there is an afterlife. If there is a heaven and hell, then only after death will that be realized. I can see how those with "faith" would want to hedge their bets. If they are wrong, they will never know it. If they are right, they go to heaven. Those who don't believe will lose if they are wrong and go to hell.
Personally I don't believe and I prefer to live my life the way that I want. If I didn't, not living how I believe would be my downside. If I'm wrong, going to hell will be my downside. I'm ok with that bet.
Have you heard of Blaise Pascal and Pascal's Wager?
You just described it.
Blaise Pascal (1623-1662) | Issue 125 | Philosophy Now
Martin Jenkins looks at the life of a mathematician-philosopher apologist.philosophynow.org
I did not know of Pascal. Those were my thoughts on my own. From skimming the article, he seems like a logical guy that I would agree with on a lot of things. Thanks for introducing that.
thanks friend. I tend to over analyze things. I imagine I'd be more happy if I had a faith. But for me at this juncture in life, I don't see it. Too much evidence to the contrary.I know.
I hope you find what you’re looking for. I know you’re looking.
Then why wait?I’m going to live in eternal paradise upon my death … guaranteed 😊
thanks friend. I tend to over analyze things. I imagine I'd be more happy if I had a faith. But for me at this juncture in life, I don't see it. Too much evidence to the contrary.
Well . . . they try to teach it.The core of most religions is the Golden Rule. It seems pretty interesting that all the main religions teach that.
You can believe in (or hope for) the possibility of an afterlife without being religious.Is there any reason to believe in religion other than the possibility of having an afterlife?
Depends on how you define religionYou can believe in (or hope for) the possibility of an afterlife without being religious.
1. God is real.Try the agnostic prayer a few times a day for the next few months and see how it goes:
"God if you're real, I have to know."
You can believe in (or hope for) the possibility of an afterlife without being religious.
Is that what you did? Follow up question, did his/her voice sound different than the other voices in your head?Try the agnostic prayer a few times a day for the next few months and see how it goes:
"God if you're real, I have to know."
Um, they/them please you fvcking bigot!Is that what you did? Follow up question, did his/her voice sound different than the other voices in your head?
Is that what you did? Follow up question, did his/her voice sound different than the other voices in your head?
Well . . . they try to teach it.
Maybe the best religion is the one that succeeds most in teaching it.
Probably Buddhism.
to me this is a really weak cop out argument just meant to get the weak willed to bend the knee. anyone who actually buys this argument to become a believer by definition cannot be a true believer. it’s just a facade to trick oneself into saying words to the effect of believing. so they would be condemned the same as nonbelievers.It's a pretty interesting thought experiment.
Both Mother Teresa and Christopher Hitchens are dead.
If Hitch was right, he and Mother Teresa don't even know it.
If Mother Teresa was right, she's in bliss and he's in torment, probably.
Good point fvcker.Um, they/them please you fvcking bigot!
to me this is a really weak cop out argument just meant to get the weak willed to bend the knee. anyone who actually buys this argument to become a believer by definition cannot be a true believer. it’s just a facade to trick oneself into saying words to the effect of believing. so they would be condemned the same as nonbelievers.
imo a lot of believers just say they are — they actually have doubts and fears. the ones who truly believe ie “know” are bound to be miniscule in number and atleast some of them could be very scary people irl. finally if just words to the effect of being a believer are all that it takes, it just shows the whole thing is merely a powerplay.
i do think there’s room for personal religion and it can be good but the instant external coercion of any sort is introduced the good is lost.