ADVERTISEMENT

Arrests of the Traitors coming in now

Hahaha. Way to piss your pants, dunce. Maybe next time remember the actual conversation before you bring weak shit to me.
Blah, blah, blah.

You, nor even anyone else on this board, have any idea what you are talking about.

Go sleep it off.

Seek some professional help when you do wake up.

Hopefully you will, wake up, AND seek professional help.

Peace.
 
It already has been. You just find the truth to be malleable.
The treacherous filth of the GQP should all be executed. Anyone found to be involved should be publicly castrated and made to eat their own genitals.
 
Blah, blah, blah.

You, nor even anyone else on this board, have any idea what you are talking about.

Go sleep it off.

Seek some professional help when you do wake up.

Hopefully you will, wake up, AND seek professional help.

Peace.
This is one of the better self owns I have ever seen on a message board. Call someone "Dopey" while pissing your pants about the wrong topic.


Well done Huey.
 
More convictions like this need to happen. This the first time this has happened since 2002, when a Democrat was convicted on similar charges.

How are you connecting this to January 6th?

I suspect we already know the answer. You're a partisan Democrat, and this guy happens to be a Republican.

I suspect in your case, it never really has much to do with right or wrong, it always has to do with what party committed the right or wrong. That's fine, but in my view, that's a pretty narrow view of the reality of DC.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: unsubstantiated
The Thomas text scandal circles back around to John Eastman. He was a clerk for Clarence Thomas, and Ginni is well known for maintaining ties with former clerks. Why was Eastman so confident he could get 1-2 members of the SCOTUS to agree with his crazy theories?
Time for Ginni to get a subpoena.
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/03/26/ginni-thomas-west-wing-trump-john-eastman-00020675

FWIW, Thomas cannot claim "ignorance"

His responsibility under the law here was an "affirmative" one, meaning he was required to evaluate/look for any potential conflicts. That means he'd have been required to ask both of those parties what their involvement was, and would clearly have observed the obvious conflicts.
 


I'm old enough to remember when Hillary Clinton was vilified for not turning over all her emails; then a "mirror" of her emails was found on another computer, and they learned that she indeed had turned over all of her emails.

This would appear to be a clear case of Obstruction, and if it isn't prosecuted, we're probably doomed as a democracy...
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT