ADVERTISEMENT

Back from the Rose Bowl....my thoughts on the trip....

From what I could tell, it's basically impossible to see what the game plan was on either side of the ball because we didn't execute anything. Having a plan of attack is great, it's even better if you can do the fundamental things like block and tackle and iowa did neither.

I thought the refs missed a couple calls that hurt Iowa early when the game wasn't completely out of hand...the non pass interference on Smith, the guy was draped all over him, that should have been a first down, the non face mask on CJ when his helmet was basically ripped off.

CJ's QB clock was obviously still on central time because even when there was enough protection for him to at the very least get rid of the ball to avoid a sack he couldn't even do that. There were at least a couple possessions that went from first and 10 to second and 16 because CJ took sacks when the protection was good enough but the coverage was there.

Iowa looked lost because our style of play just isn't meant to overcome long down and distance. Since the running game wasn't moving, and the passing game was often going in reverse, the game plan didn't matter.
Rolling out of the pocket was apparently an impossibility for CJ in the game.....basically looked like the f***ing BTCG.
 
My guess is if the result's were different we would not be hearing as much about the band.

You would maybe not hear about it as vehemently, but you would still be hearing about it since it was so inappropriate for the venue and setting that it would be hard to ignore. Thousands and thousands of Iowa fans were offended by their performance, fans who coughed up thousands of dollars to attend that game, and I do think they deserved better than to be "trolled" by the opposing team's band. You kind of had to be there to understand, perhaps, how bad it truly came off.

And it WAS bad, make no mistake about that.
 
First off, Shaw never called for a pass on that play, Hogan audibled into it. He didn't want his college career to end with an interception.
Wrong. He had just completed a pass to McCaffery. Nice try.

So what if Iowa was still in full throttle mode? Should they just quit (like Stanford did in the first Rose Bowl game)? Throwing that bomb was classless and poor sportsmanship. Period. I would be angry and embarrassed if Iowa did that.

Your team had the chance to take the high road (like 95% of teams would have done), but chose not to.

Congratulations on the win.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BDJHawk
I don't understand how people can question the team's effort. You really think any of those KIDS were not giving 100%? Yes, mental errors were made (1st play, INT for TD, missed assignments on OL) but I will never question their effort. You may have seen some KIDS with their heads down after going down 21 or 28 to 0...but that doesn't mean they gave up. I'm proud they came out and won the 2nd half, great season and special group of KIDS. Go Hawks!
 
  • Like
Reactions: rivercityjazzman
Wrong. He had just completed a pass to McCaffery. Nice try.

So what if Iowa was still in full throttle mode? Should they just quit (like Stanford did in the first Rose Bowl game)? Throwing that bomb was classless and poor sportsmanship. Period. I would be angry and embarrassed if Iowa did that.

Your team had the chance to take the high road (like 95% of teams would have done), but chose not to.

Congratulations on the win.


Both Shaw and Hogan have said on record it was Hogan's call and Shaw was only sending in run plays. That quick one to McCaff was to get him over the 100 yards mark in receiving.

As I said before, it is more insulting to your opponent to just kneel down and roll over. Don't the kids, who practice all season and will never play in the NFL, deserve the chance to go out and compete at their best effort? You think your defense gets any quality reps in live fire if the opponent is just running into a pile? You don't like being scored on with a stat-padding TD? GET BETTER! This is not peewee football--play football to the last whistle or go home.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cardinal_2001
Former Stanford Band member and 10 year Des Moines resident here. First, the band does this to every opponent and while their skits have been terrible for quite some time due to AD oversight, most who are familiar with the band ignore it. The only people the band is trying to entertain are other Stanford students (18-21 year olds) filling their narration with inside jokes that Stanford alumni might not even undertand. Second, they are an irreverent, independent student-run group that receives no funding from the university. With the exception of travel which is paid by the AD, the band raises funds to operate. Lastly, did Stanford fans you encountered act disrespectfully? I would much rather you held a memory of those who were sitting in the stands and walking the streets wearing Stanford gear and not a memory of a student group whose purpose is to rile up the opponent. I understand the situation; it was a blowout by halftime and then you had to watch that performance. At best, the show was stupid, but I wouldn't consider it offensive as others have labeled or something worth remembering.
so the band gets no funding but the AD allows these idiots to go out and represent the university? Maybe just maybe it is time to not let them be associated with the Treehuggers and ban them from all activities. They are a joke. The last pass by your qb was classless. Why the hell is he even in the game? Would have been justice if he or #5 got hurt late. The 2nd unit can play and get after it in the last 2 min and nobody is butthurt.
 
Both Shaw and Hogan have said on record it was Hogan's call and Shaw was only sending in run plays. That quick one to McCaff was to get him over the 100 yards mark in receiving.

As I said before, it is more insulting to your opponent to just kneel down and roll over. Don't the kids, who practice all season and will never play in the NFL, deserve the chance to go out and compete at their best effort? You think your defense gets any quality reps in live fire if the opponent is just running into a pile? You don't like being scored on with a stat-padding TD? GET BETTER! This is not peewee football--play football to the last whistle or go home.
You can justify it to yourself all you want.....it was still classless and poor sportsmanship. The vast majority of teams would not have done this. Had Hogan been injured on that play I'm sure you would be singing a different tune.

Enjoy the win.
 
You can justify it to yourself all you want.....it was still classless and poor sportsmanship. The vast majority of teams would not have done this. Had Hogan been injured on that play I'm sure you would be singing a different tune.

Only people who never play or understand football think that was classless, so thanks for identifying yourself in that regard.

Considering that was Hogan's last play of his career, an injury wouldn't have bothered me all that much.
 
Former Stanford Band member and 10 year Des Moines resident here. First, the band does this to every opponent and while their skits have been terrible for quite some time due to AD oversight, most who are familiar with the band ignore it. The only people the band is trying to entertain are other Stanford students (18-21 year olds) filling their narration with inside jokes that Stanford alumni might not even undertand. Second, they are an irreverent, independent student-run group that receives no funding from the university. With the exception of travel which is paid by the AD, the band raises funds to operate. Lastly, did Stanford fans you encountered act disrespectfully? I would much rather you held a memory of those who were sitting in the stands and walking the streets wearing Stanford gear and not a memory of a student group whose purpose is to rile up the opponent. I understand the situation; it was a blowout by halftime and then you had to watch that performance. At best, the show was stupid, but I wouldn't consider it offensive as others have labeled or something worth remembering.

Pretty lame effort to justify the existence of a worthless organization with absolutely no socially redeeming value whatsoever. For what it's worth, you did absolutely nothing to change my opinion that they should either conduct themselves with some degree of class or be shut down altogether.

Defenders of this "band" invariably go immediately to the fact that "they do this to everyone" which, in their minds, somehow justifies their offensive conduct. What a logical fallacy. Is a serial murderer less guilty because "he does it all the time"? I'll let you answer that for yourselves. Yes, the Stanford band is a million times more harmless than a serial killer, but you get the point. I have nothing against humor -- all for it, in fact. They can be a humorous "scatter band" and not mock others in a flat-out insulting, demeaning way. If they aren't creative enough to be humorous without acting like a bunch of pompous asses, they should take up another hobby.
 
1. We were extremely lucky re: traffic. Left our hotel by LAX at 8, and were in our parking lot by 8:40. Got right on 210 after the game for the drive to Vegas and other than a short initial slowdown, we were on our way.

2. Lots of things to do in public tailgating area.

3. Chuckies tenderloins. Nice to see an Iowa vendor.

4. I'm sorry, but not all that impressed with the Rose Bowl stadium. I am as big on history and tradition as anyone, but that stadium is showing its age. Unless some updating is done, it will shortly be on its way to becoming a dump. Definitely looks much better on TV than in person.

5. Took forever to get into the stadium 2 hours before game time. Terrible job by the security people.

6. Awful game plan by coaching staff. Looked like they didn't watch more than 2 minutes of film on Stanford. After the shellacking the Hawks took in last years' bowl game, yesterday was inexcusable.

7. The players looked like they had no interest in being there. Granted, I was watching from the stands and not on TV, but I can't think of more than a couple players who actually looked like they were giving 100%. I understand the disappointment and emotional letdown from losing the Big 10 championship game....but other than the playoffs, the Rose Bowl is still better than all the other bowls, and winning it still means something to most of the country. The Hawks were in the center of the national stage, and put out a disgraceful performance. This was a once in a lifetime opportunity. Someday these players are going to look back and regret not putting forth a better effort. I don't mind losing....not bothering to show up does.

8. I never used to have anything against Stanford, but yesterday showed how classless they are. There is no excuse for your starting QB to be throwing bombs when you have an insurmountable lead and only 2 and a half minutes left on the clock. And their band.....nothing more needs to be said about that.

9. Although I am disappointed with the bowl result, I am still proud of this team and what they accomplished this season. It is great to be a Hawkeye![/QUOT]
I disagree about the stadium. I thought it was awesome. Much better setup than say memorial stadium in Lincoln. And the scenery around the stadium is unmatched with the san Gabriel mountains in the background. The seats on the sides are pro style with backs and arms, actual seats. I was very impressed and blessed to have gotten to go watch that in spite of the outcome of the game.
 
Cardinal,

Stanford fans were the worst I have encountered in almost any sports setting. I expected the air of superiority and entitlement of Northwestern fans. What I didn't expect was that they'd also have a heavy dose of the arrogance of Nebraska fans and rudeness of the drunk Wiskey fans.
 
Only people who never play or understand football think that was classless, so thanks for identifying yourself in that regard.

Considering that was Hogan's last play of his career, an injury wouldn't have bothered me all that much.
You don't know anything about me.

But the fact that you wouldn't care if Hogan was injured sure says a lot about YOU.

(and it WAS classless)
 
83, your #7 is way off base ... the players and coaches gave max effort in prep and the game, sometimes the other teams scheme/plan works better, their players play better, their team takes advantage of a break or two, they get on a roll, etc. ... Stanford is a good team that was just plain better than Iowa on Friday, it happens (i.e. doesn't mean Iowa "didn't want to be there", that is just silly).
 
7. The players looked like they had no interest in being there. Granted, I was watching from the stands and not on TV, but I can't think of more than a couple players who actually looked like they were giving 100%.

Someday these players are going to look back and regret not putting forth a better effort. I don't mind losing....not bothering to show up does.

83, the players cared.... ALOT. They, and not the fans, were the ones that won 12 games in 2015. Not saying this to be antagonistic, but they didn't get this far by not caring or being apathetic. They overcame many obstacles to get to that point. They felt absolutely terrible about letting their fans down in that manner, and it really hurt having to send off the seniors in that way. These words were paraphrased from my conversation with my kid (who is a Hawk player).

I do think they ran into an opponent that was clearly better than them, and they were outplayed and out coached. This is nothing to hang their head about in the long run - as long as they use this to help them refocus for 2016, and carry on the turnaround started in 2015. With continued good play on the field, improved recruiting, and tweaking of bowl game coaching/game prep, the program will undoubtedly improve. This is the key, IMO. Go Hawks!!
 
^ Thank your kid for me. He helped me check off a bucket list item. Those guys were the best Iowa team I've watched in my 25 years of being a Hawkeye. I hope those guys knew the post game send off was genuine.
 
83, the players cared.... ALOT. They, and not the fans, were the ones that won 12 games in 2015. Not saying this to be antagonistic, but they didn't get this far by not caring or being apathetic. They overcame many obstacles to get to that point. They felt absolutely terrible about letting their fans down in that manner, and it really hurt having to send off the seniors in that way. These words were paraphrased from my conversation with my kid (who is a Hawk player).

I do think they ran into an opponent that was clearly better than them, and they were outplayed and out coached. This is nothing to hang their head about in the long run - as long as they use this to help them refocus for 2016, and carry on the turnaround started in 2015. With continued good play on the field, improved recruiting, and tweaking of bowl game coaching/game prep, the program will undoubtedly improve. This is the key, IMO. Go Hawks!!
I was not meaning to be disrespectful. Please thank your son for a great season.

My impression is probably a combination of the Stanford players being better, falling behind big early, and the horrendous game preparation by the coaching staff.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rivercityjazzman
I was not meaning to be disrespectful. Please thank your son for a great season.

My impression is probably a combination of the Stanford players being better, falling behind big early, and the horrendous game preparation by the coaching staff.

It was a great season, I had heard practices were a little lethargic prior to leaving Iowa City, Stanford played their starters a little longer than I would have expected in a game like this, would have hated to see McCaffery tweak a knee on a play designed with the sole purpose of getting him stats, if it's the 2nd or 3rd string qb throwing that pass to a backup receiver than less would be said. And yes played the game after high school as well. The Stanford band is and has been a disgrace, it did the unthinkable, made me root for ND. The fans weren't enjoyable. As far as the Cardinal claims that they belong in the final four and that the Big Ten was exposed, well hopefully they can look in the mirror and blame themselves. Try leaving your state and beating a middle of the pack Big Ten team and all of your problems are gone. You had to travel east and play an early game? Boo hoo, get better.
 
Just got back from the Rose Bowl, been an Iowa season-ticket holder for decades, fan since the age of 2, basically.

My thoughts:

At some point, a team/university decides to conduct themselves with class...or they don't. It's not illegal to act stupid, or immature, or even like an a-hole. Go ahead, do what you want.

On the other hand, Stanford lacked in the class department, which surprised me, when it came to the band's "performance", and in the throwing of the 50 yard bomb with 2 minutes left. Again, not against the law, not a penalty, not a huge butthurt for me. Just a surprise to come from Stanford. I expect that stuff from teams like the old Miami, and sometimes Oklahoma, when it comes to scoring late.

But Stanford? I thought they were classier than that. Guess I was wrong.

When it comes to the band, specifically, I was offended not as an Iowan, but as someone who appreciated witty comedy. The pre-game had some witty moments ("...that patriarchic social construct we call gender", in reference to the Iowa pink-locker room controversy), but the halftime with the FarmersOnly.com and so on was VERY low-hanging fruit kind of stuff. At some point, the administration is likely to pull the plug on their antics, and I think a low-class showing like this AT THE ROSE BOWL (!) would be a not-inappropriate time to do that. If you can't bring a little class TO THE FRIGGING ROSE BOWL then I think you're beyond hope.

When it comes to the stadium, it IS a dump. Bathrooms are a nightmare. Concessions in the stadium are a nightmare. Security line was a nightmare (the "Express Lane" for those without bags took twice the time as the normal line!). The sound was tinny and crappy. One video board, few replays. I was really disappointed that the "atmosphere" of the so-called Granddaddy of Them All was less-than-awe-inspiring, to say the least. The place needs serious work.

Also (and this did not affect me, as I was on a bus tour), why the hell is there no Metro stop within reasonable walking distance of a major sports and entertainment stadium? Really ridiculous. On the positive side, the food at the outside vendors at the public tailgate was quite good, if pricey.

OK, end of rant.
Don't worry , you will never be invited back to another Rose Bowl after that debacle
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hawks_22
I don't understand how people can question the team's effort. You really think any of those KIDS were not giving 100%? Yes, mental errors were made (1st play, INT for TD, missed assignments on OL) but I will never question their effort. You may have seen some KIDS with their heads down after going down 21 or 28 to 0...but that doesn't mean they gave up. I'm proud they came out and won the 2nd half, great season and special group of KIDS. Go Hawks!

I saw many mistakes and lack of fundamentals in the game. Imo they may have physically played 100%, but mentally they were far from 100%... at least imo. Regardless how physical football is, that mental part is still huge. If you've seen little giants then you know football is 80% mental and 40% physical :D.

They had more pressure on them than probably any hawkeye team(any sport) I've ever seen, and they didn't handle it well. Of course I am sure I wouldn't have either.

Either way, it is what it is....looking forward to 8 months from now!!!
 
The Rose Bowl was a mismatch. Stanford was clearly the better team and was better prepared. I would never say that Iowa didn't give it 100%. Iowa had a fabulous year and this poor showing does not change the great things this team accomplished.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rivercityjazzman
between Cowherd and Finebaum during the season and the Stanford Band at the bowl games, I think many of Hawk fans are simply looking for something to get riled up about
 
Former Stanford Band member and 10 year Des Moines resident here. First, the band does this to every opponent and while their skits have been terrible for quite some time due to AD oversight, most who are familiar with the band ignore it. The only people the band is trying to entertain are other Stanford students (18-21 year olds) filling their narration with inside jokes that Stanford alumni might not even undertand. Second, they are an irreverent, independent student-run group that receives no funding from the university. With the exception of travel which is paid by the AD, the band raises funds to operate. Lastly, did Stanford fans you encountered act disrespectfully? I would much rather you held a memory of those who were sitting in the stands and walking the streets wearing Stanford gear and not a memory of a student group whose purpose is to rile up the opponent. I understand the situation; it was a blowout by halftime and then you had to watch that performance. At best, the show was stupid, but I wouldn't consider it offensive as others have labeled or something worth remembering.

Oh, I don't know about Stanford fans being totally classy. While walking into the game my wife and I wished some Stanford fans good luck and they raised their glass and said let us toast the losers.

Also found it appalling when a male and female Stanford couple got in the face of an elderly couple from Iowa, probably in their 70's. Came late and accused them of taking their seat space, which they had not. Real classy.

If you want to make excuses for an out of control bunch of spoiled brats, so be it. Personally, I did not find any creativity in their antics. They totally disrespected Iowa and farmers. Somebody needs to take them behind the woodshed and teach them some manners. Little punks!
 
Last edited:
Cardinal,

Stanford fans were the worst I have encountered in almost any sports setting. I expected the air of superiority and entitlement of Northwestern fans. What I didn't expect was that they'd also have a heavy dose of the arrogance of Nebraska fans and rudeness of the drunk Wiskey fans.

At least we Iowa fans are really distinguishing ourselves in this thread.
 
  • Like
Reactions: starbrown
Cardinal 2001.

Go to hell

Sincerely,
Everyone not from stanfart

Your band was suspended for sexual harassment and hazing and yet were allowed to travel to the rose bowl. It has been doing this for years you say. So did Sandusky. You are on good company you classless twit

I think you are confusing Ohio State's band with Stanford's. I'll buy you a drink sometime in downtown Des Moines so you know there are no hard feelings.
 
Pretty lame effort to justify the existence of a worthless organization with absolutely no socially redeeming value whatsoever. For what it's worth, you did absolutely nothing to change my opinion that they should either conduct themselves with some degree of class or be shut down altogether.

Defenders of this "band" invariably go immediately to the fact that "they do this to everyone" which, in their minds, somehow justifies their offensive conduct. What a logical fallacy. Is a serial murderer less guilty because "he does it all the time"? I'll let you answer that for yourselves. Yes, the Stanford band is a million times more harmless than a serial killer, but you get the point. I have nothing against humor -- all for it, in fact. They can be a humorous "scatter band" and not mock others in a flat-out insulting, demeaning way. If they aren't creative enough to be humorous without acting like a bunch of pompous asses, they should take up another hobby.

Like I said, much of what they do involves knowledge only students or alumni know. For example, Stanford is called "The Farm". With that in mind, here is a link to the script that most did not hear that accompanied the formations. Stanford, Iowa, and the Rose bowl all approved the show.

https://www.facebook.com/lsjumb/posts/10154484759815760
 
And then like 2 plays later he ran for several yds or a 1st down and was fine......


CJ was far from 'fine' after the hit he took in the first quarter. It is yet one more example of the toughness he exhibited for much of the 2015 season.

Here is hoping Beathard can have a truly healthy (in comparison to this fall) season next fall.
 
Cardinal,

Stanford fans were the worst I have encountered in almost any sports setting. I expected the air of superiority and entitlement of Northwestern fans. What I didn't expect was that they'd also have a heavy dose of the arrogance of Nebraska fans and rudeness of the drunk Wiskey fans.

Wow! I am sorry you experienced that; I cannot stand that kinda crap. Everyone I know would not do that and are more inviting, but maybe you were dealing with non-alumni fans who feel superior just because "I cheer for Stanford". Yeah, f*** those types.
 
I'm sure it would be nice to say it's a few bad apples but I don't buy it given the frequency with which we encountered that kind of behavior.
 
CJ was far from 'fine' after the hit he took in the first quarter. It is yet one more example of the toughness he exhibited for much of the 2015 season.

Here is hoping Beathard can have a truly healthy (in comparison to this fall) season next fall.
I guess that makes it okay to let him sit in the pocket every time and get left with NJ owner to go before getting crushed multiple times.

Much safer than rolling out of the pocket by design so that he can throw the ball away if need to be to avoid unnecessary hits (note, he doesn't have to run/scramble every time he leaves the pocket............)

And if the coaches are that worried about his options being limited and we can't get any pass off then it's time to get more creative in the run game.

We should be able to do more than the basic zone stretch or two yd dive next year to beat teams, especially the good ones, with the group we have coming back.

But I guess that depends on if the staff learns anything from this year or if they want to truly take that next step rather than just getting there.
 
Wow! I am sorry you experienced that; I cannot stand that kinda crap. Everyone I know would not do that and are more inviting, but maybe you were dealing with non-alumni fans who feel superior just because "I cheer for Stanford". Yeah, f*** those types.

SP would approve.
 
First off, Shaw never called for a pass on that play, Hogan audibled into it. He didn't want his college career to end with an interception. Considering the success he has had, he earned that right. Secondly, as another of your fans pointed out, YOUR TEAM WAS STILL IN FULL THROTTLE MODE! Never mind we had our second and third string defenders out there for most of the second half. If Ferentz was still playing to win, why shouldn't we? Lastly, even if the game was 70-0 at that point, it is your job to stop the other team. You think passing for the end zone is insulting? What do you think pulling starters and running kneel-down plays is to the opponent? That's like saying "You don't belong on the field with us...here is the mercy rule." Get a grip man and save me the classless, disrespectful argument. This is big time college football.
douchebag-supercut-2-back-to-the-future-1092287-TwoByOne.jpg


Make like a tree and get outta here
 
83, the players cared.... ALOT. They, and not the fans, were the ones that won 12 games in 2015. Not saying this to be antagonistic, but they didn't get this far by not caring or being apathetic. They overcame many obstacles to get to that point. They felt absolutely terrible about letting their fans down in that manner, and it really hurt having to send off the seniors in that way. These words were paraphrased from my conversation with my kid (who is a Hawk player).

I do think they ran into an opponent that was clearly better than them, and they were outplayed and out coached. This is nothing to hang their head about in the long run - as long as they use this to help them refocus for 2016, and carry on the turnaround started in 2015. With continued good play on the field, improved recruiting, and tweaking of bowl game coaching/game prep, the program will undoubtedly improve. This is the key, IMO. Go Hawks!!
Obviously, the players and coaches all wanted to be there and obviously they cared. However, I can also appreciate a group of 18-22 year olds getting down quickly, having every offensive scheme be shut down quickly, watching Stanford's offense demolish Iowa's vaunted defense, losing a bit of that focus and energy to continue giving 100% effort throughout the entire game.

One question I have for you or anyone in the know is WHY did Stanford look so much better prepared than Iowa? I can live with Stanford having better players, and McCaffery is one of the best I've seen. But, once again, the Iowa coaching staff seemed woefully unprepared for this bowl game. I thought they had learned their lesson years ago (eg. Orange Bowl vs. Georgia Tech), but the past few bowls leave me questioning the staff's commitment to bowl preparation.
 
Obviously, the players and coaches all wanted to be there and obviously they cared. However, I can also appreciate a group of 18-22 year olds getting down quickly, having every offensive scheme be shut down quickly, watching Stanford's offense demolish Iowa's vaunted defense, losing a bit of that focus and energy to continue giving 100% effort throughout the entire game.

One question I have for you or anyone in the know is WHY did Stanford look so much better prepared than Iowa? I can live with Stanford having better players, and McCaffery is one of the best I've seen. But, once again, the Iowa coaching staff seemed woefully unprepared for this bowl game. I thought they had learned their lesson years ago (eg. Orange Bowl vs. Georgia Tech), but the past few bowls leave me questioning the staff's commitment to bowl preparation.
Had me scratching my head as well esp after the last debacle vs Tennessee.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT