ADVERTISEMENT

Belief in God in U.S. dips to 81%, a new low

Do you believe in God?

  • Yes

    Votes: 77 43.3%
  • No

    Votes: 74 41.6%
  • Unsure/Maybe

    Votes: 27 15.2%

  • Total voters
    178
Agnosticism as a qualitative label isn't very useful.

Technically, every rational person could be defaulted into the category on the basis of some level of doubt.

What's interesting is the level of doubt. For a rational person this will be in accordance to the evidence for X. (God in this instance)

For example... I find the evidence for the likelihood of a theistic, as biblically depicted, God to be extraordinarily lacking. Basically... no good evidence at all. And so I'm defaulted into extreme skepticism. Say 99.9% confident based upon available evidence that there is no theistic God.

No, nobody can be *perfectly* sure, but that's not saying anything interesting, is it? We could posit infinite unlikely scenario in which we're not able to definitively exclude the possibility of X. But you don't worry about those low probability items, do you? I just add one more (God) to the list than you.

And so... Paschal's wager and other such thought experiments don't really go anywhere with such extreme skepticism.

(which I believe to be reasonably derived from lack of evidence)

There's tons of evidence for Jesus, though.

I'm 100% certain He was and is real.
 
I don’t think there is a god but I’m not sure what happens after death. Some NDEs (near death experience) stories are wild to me and idk how that can be explained. Like when a person is legally dead but they can see what is happening from a far but that would be physically and mentally impossible under such circumstances. There is definitely a higher being within the cosmos but I don’t know if that has any impact with us.

I am in the camp of Live your best life, treat people with respect in real life (not HORT), and just be a good person. Whatever happens after death then I guess we will see. 🤷🏽‍♂️
 
I don’t think there is a god but I’m not sure what happens after death. Some NDEs (near death experience) stories are wild to me and idk how that can be explained. Like when a person is legally dead but they can see what is happening from a far but that would be physically and mentally impossible under such circumstances. There is definitely a higher being within the cosmos but I don’t know if that has any impact with us.

I am in the camp of Live your best life, treat people with respect in real life (not HORT), and just be a good person. Whatever happens after death then I guess we will see. 🤷🏽‍♂️
NDE can be trigger from certain drug use. (not because you're actually dying)

Brains be weird.
 
I don’t think there is a god but I’m not sure what happens after death. Some NDEs (near death experience) stories are wild to me and idk how that can be explained. Like when a person is legally dead but they can see what is happening from a far but that would be physically and mentally impossible under such circumstances. There is definitely a higher being within the cosmos but I don’t know if that has any impact with us.

I am in the camp of Live your best life, treat people with respect in real life (not HORT), and just be a good person. Whatever happens after death then I guess we will see. 🤷🏽‍♂️
I believe this too. It’s also very logical
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrunoMars420
*Act as though you believe.

Because apparently an all knowing all powerful being is bamboozled by such a maneuver.

Jesus said His followers would receive a reward in this life in the next.

Matthew 19:27-29​

New American Standard Bible​

The Disciples’ Reward​

Then Peter responded and said to Him, “Behold, we have left everything and followed You; what then will there be for us?” And Jesus said to them, “Truly I say to you, that you who have followed Me, in the regeneration when the Son of Man will sit on His glorious throne, you also shall sit upon twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel. And everyone who has left houses or brothers or sisters or father or mother or children or farms on account of My name, will receive many times as much, and will inherit eternal life."
 
Jesus said His followers would receive a reward in this life in the next.

Matthew 19:27-29​

New American Standard Bible​

The Disciples’ Reward​

Then Peter responded and said to Him, “Behold, we have left everything and followed You; what then will there be for us?” And Jesus said to them, “Truly I say to you, that you who have followed Me, in the regeneration when the Son of Man will sit on His glorious throne, you also shall sit upon twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel. And everyone who has left houses or brothers or sisters or father or mother or children or farms on account of My name, will receive many times as much, and will inherit eternal life."

So if someone, say, 80% confident there is no God takes up Paschal's Wager and goes through the motions, God will reward them?


It's been a while, but this was one of the first to pop up in my search: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01424/full

Near Death are often in the same category of thing -- maybe even the same -- as out of body, which I know certain drugs will invoke.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bulldogs1974
“This study has significant weaknesses because it is based on purely subjective reports—some taken decades after the event. Similarly, there is no way to substantiate the accounts in the Erowid collection as there is no way to prove that any individual took the drug they claimed or believed they were taking.”

Aka this gives us an idea but not really. I get the ketamine comparisons but it still doesn’t explain the unexplainable 🤷🏽‍♂️
 
  • Like
Reactions: HawkFan1298
We have to choose because remaining agnostic is basically rejecting God. It's just sitting on the fence and refusing to choose.

I am Catholic. :)
well said sir, I am however atheist I in no way mean to discredit your belief structure but and it's a big hairy butt I am not trying to make laws based upon my religious beliefs as those of your folks seem to feel is ok.
 
well said sir, I am however atheist I in no way mean to discredit your belief structure but and it's a big hairy butt I am not trying to make laws based upon my religious beliefs as those of your folks seem to feel is ok.

Dunno sir.

Many atheists are trying their best to eliminate God from the public square.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GroupThink
He doesn't understand what you're saying you might as well bow out now.

I know what an agnostic is.

It's someone that doesn't believe or disbelieve in God. They won't commit either way.

I argue that an agnostic is basically an atheist because they lack belief in God.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GroupThink
I don’t think there is a god but I’m not sure what happens after death. Some NDEs (near death experience) stories are wild to me and idk how that can be explained. Like when a person is legally dead but they can see what is happening from a far but that would be physically and mentally impossible under such circumstances. There is definitely a higher being within the cosmos but I don’t know if that has any impact with us.

I am in the camp of Live your best life, treat people with respect in real life (not HORT), and just be a good person. Whatever happens after death then I guess we will see. 🤷🏽‍♂️

Here's some more info on NDE's:

 
  • Like
Reactions: GroupThink
“This study has significant weaknesses because it is based on purely subjective reports—some taken decades after the event. Similarly, there is no way to substantiate the accounts in the Erowid collection as there is no way to prove that any individual took the drug they claimed or believed they were taking.”

Aka this gives us an idea but not really. I get the ketamine comparisons but it still doesn’t explain the unexplainable 🤷🏽‍♂️
Sort of. It's all going to be subjective reports because that's what we're dealing with: subjective experience.

But yes, we need better study to understand exactly what is going on. (and more/better data collection) I'm not sure we're even able as of yet to untangle the complex physiological process that take place anyway. There's lots we don't understand about the brain yet; how exactly does human consciousness arise?

Now... all that said; ignorance about topic X can't be used as evidence for topic Y.

That's the "God of the gaps" fallacy. Taking X topic that we don't completely understand yet and inserting God as the answer.

That's silly -- you can't just stuff God into these gaps of knowledge, you also have to prove he's the one at work.

If you go back 500 years (hell 100 even) people would've been pointing to all kinds of now solved scientific queries in which God was an often cited explanation.

The problem with this approach as evidence for God is that these gaps of knowledge shrink over time, leaving God nothing to do.
 
Sort of. It's all going to be subjective reports because that's what we're dealing with: subjective experience.

But yes, we need better study to understand exactly what is going on. (and more/better data collection) I'm not sure we're even able as of yet to untangle the complex physiological process that take place anyway. There's lots we don't understand about the brain yet; how exactly does human consciousness arise?

Now... all that said; ignorance about topic X can't be used as evidence for topic Y.

That's the "God of the gaps" fallacy. Taking X topic that we don't completely understand yet and inserting God as the answer.

That's silly -- you can't just stuff God into these gaps of knowledge, you also have to prove he's the one at work.

If you go back 500 years (hell 100 even) people would've been pointing to all kinds of now solved scientific queries in which God was an often cited explanation.

The problem with this approach as evidence for God is that these gaps of knowledge shrink over time, leaving God nothing to do.

Speaking of science, you know the greatest scientist of all time, Sir Isaac Newton, believed in God, right? :)

 
  • Like
Reactions: GroupThink
Speaking of science, you know the greatest scientist of all time, Sir Isaac Newton, believed in God, right? :)

Faith and science are not compatible. Some will certainly accept an unreasonable choice out of fear.
 
Faith and science are not compatible. Some will certainly accept an unreasonable choice out of fear.

Thats not true. 40% of scientists are religious in America.

Isn't it reasonable to makes choices based on fear sometimes?

Do you drive 50 MPH over the speed limit while drinking and not wearing your seat belt?

 
  • Like
Reactions: hawkcub
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT