Who is getting my tax dollars this time?
Depends on what kind of trick Bozo is going to perform here,.. Guarantee that when the complete story becomes available, it will somehow involve spending your tax dollars to purchase votes..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Who is getting my tax dollars this time?
I used f*ck not re. Is lib**rd ok? Seems to get thrown around regularly with no anguish.Using asterisks doesn’t make the R word less offensive.
Did they come through a legal port of entry in your line of questioning?What law did people requesting asylum break?
Shawn is pretty fair game with his disdain for the that word in general. Just FYI. I don't find it offensive in any of its forms myself, including the hard r.I used f*ck not re. Is lib**rd ok? Seems to get thrown around regularly with no anguish.
Depends on what kind of trick Bozo is going to perform here,.. Guarantee that when the complete story becomes available, it will somehow involve spending your tax dollars to purchase votes..
What law did people requesting asylum break?
That is not a requirement under the statute. Title 8 provides a party can request asylum at a port of entry or inside the country.Did they come through a legal port of entry in your line of questioning?
With that level of cynicism, everything could be construed as simply buying votes.
If they are in the country illegally and did not come through a port of entry in the first place then yes, they broke the law. Allowing an individual to seek asylum inside the country does not give clearance to illegally enter the country outside of a port of entry. Nice try.That is not a requirement under the statute. Title 8 provides a party can request asylum at a port of entry or inside the country.
The many Cubans that your party relies on for republican vote in south Florida immigrated under the similar dry foot policy.
It should be.I'd say that is not the common understanding right now.
Just itching to vote for the indicted rapist. Fascinating.And that would be a fairly safe assumption with the current clown show...
And that would be a fairly safe assumption with the current clown show...
I understand that is your uneducated opinion of what the law should be, but it not the law. Making it to the US and turning yourself into authority requesting asylum is the law. That statute was changed with the bipartisan bill...If they are in the country illegally and did not come through a port of entry in the first place then yes, they broke the law. Allowing an individual to seek asylum inside the country does not give clearance to illegally enter the country outside of a port of entry. Nice try.
The bill that didn't get signed into law?I understand that is your uneducated opinion of what the law should be, but it not the law. Making it to the US and turning yourself into authority requesting asylum is the law. That statute was changed with the bipartisan bill...
I understand that is your uneducated opinion of what the law should be, but it not the law. Making it to the US and turning yourself into authority requesting asylum is the law. That statute was changed with the bipartisan bill...
Making it to the US and turning yourself into authority requesting asylum is the law.
The Trump administrations EO was overturned in Court. I am not aware of a similar EO coming from earlier administrations invoking the “detrimental to US” exception. It’s possible- just not awareThis is correct,.. However, as with all legislation the administration in power is given broad latitude in determining how, and to what extent, any given law will be enforced, (i.e. federal marijuana laws),.. Regarding asylum, numerous past administrations have required newly arriving applicants to make their claim at an official US port of entry,.. not to just set foot on US soil.
The one that even some Democrats are against, that gives triple the money to Ukraine to protect their country, than towards protecting our own, and that still allows up to 5,000 people per day into the US? That one?If only there was a bipartisan bill that could be brought to a vote. Oh well.
You realize the feds were not sending actual cash to the Ukraine, right?The one that even some Democrats are against, that gives triple the money to Ukraine to protect their country, than towards protecting our own, and that still allows up to 5,000 people per day into the US? That one?
I call it out when I see it. Most that use that word are on ignore though. If that justifies you using it in your mind, keep being your cool self then. I hope you don’t use the word irl.I used f*ck not re. Is lib**rd ok? Seems to get thrown around regularly with no anguish.
Biden won't give Republicans what they want unless it's on his terms and timeline. As a Senator, Biden was relatively moderate. I'm not sure what happened to him. I had high hopes we'd get that Biden in 2020. I was really wrong.Ive said in other threads that biden could give republicans what they want and they would still bitch
You think Biden's isn't a moderate?Biden won't give Republicans what they want unless it's on his terms and timeline. As a Senator, Biden was relatively moderate. I'm not sure what happened to him. I had high hopes we'd get that Biden in 2020. I was really wrong.
Nope. Just the occasional slip when trolling in call of duty lobbies like it’s 2 decades ago. When certain things were “socially acceptable” to say. Teen habits die hard. Speaking of which, the stuff sitcoms and shows said back in the day 😱, immediately cancelled now a days.I call it out when I see it. Most that use that word are on ignore though. If that justifies you using it in your mind, keep being your cool self then. I hope you don’t use the word irl.
Yes that bipartisan bill deserves a voteThe one that even some Democrats are against, that gives triple the money to Ukraine to protect their country, than towards protecting our own, and that still allows up to 5,000 people per day into the US? That one?
No it doesn't. It's a joke. The House already passed an immigration bill, last May. It didn't get a vote in the Senate.Yes that bipartisan bill deserves a vote
The house passed a bipartisan immigration bill?No it doesn't. It's a joke. The House already passed an immigration bill, last May. It didn't get a vote in the Senate.
Moderates don’t build their cabinets with freaks over meritYou think Biden's isn't a moderate?
Examples?Moderates don’t build their cabinets with freaks over merit
My bad, it is Rachel Levine, then the bald lipstick guy. It is a diverse cabinet otherwise as well, which in and of itself is fine, but if they place diversity over merit, it's a net negative.Examples?
What applicants were more qualified and why?My bad, it is Rachel Levine, then the bald lipstick guy. It is a diverse cabinet otherwise as well, which in and of itself is fine, but if they place diversity over merit, it's a net negative.
speculation on my part, but when its pushed and celebrated that they were going to have a diverse cabinet, is it not reasonable to think they picked based on diversity and not qualifications? I may be wrong.What applicants were more qualified and why?
+1. Most Moderate Democrats don’t but these Libtards on this board do. It’s pathetic.Serious question… why is ANYONE ok with anyone coming into this country illegally?
LolLolLolLolLol😂😂😂says the Big Guy that had Laken Riley killed. This puke can’t even say her name.