I don't know what those numbers mean together or how you got them. I'm sure these aren't made up things but it does seem like you are making a different argument than the one the Biden administration is making.
One thing is for sure, for an economy with, according to your numbers, negative growth, there sure are a lot of jobs being created.
In my response I had suggested that increased government spending is picking up the slack... creating an illusion that things are good and getting better, when in fact they are getting worse. Upon review I am dissatisfied with my comments. I take note that my primary point transitioned into a somewhat irrelevant critique of one agency: The IRS.
Here is an article from an international economist named Daniel Lacalle that makes my point from a more theoretical perspective and is far more coherent than were my ad hoc remarks.
I have taken the liberty of highlighting certain key sentences that I felt were specifically relevant.
............
Money Supply Slump Spells Private Sector Recession
25 June, 2023
Allow me
to explain why we have not seen a recession yet despite the collapse in base money supply.
We are witnessing the stealth nationalization of the economy. What does this mean? The entire burden of the monetary collapse and rate hikes is falling on the shoulders of families and small businesses, while large corporations and governments are virtually unaffected.
Thus, when an agent like the state, which weighs 40 to 60 percent of GDP in most economies, continues to consume wealth and spend, gross domestic product does not show a recession even though consumption and private investment in real terms is declining.
Bloated government spending is disguising a private sector recession and the decline in real disposable income, real wages, and margins of SMEs (small and medium enterprises). Furthermore, the accidental and exogenous factor of widespread weaker commodities is boosting the external contribution of gross domestic product.
These are the main reasons why we are living in the middle of a recession and destruction of private wealth and wages, but the official data does not reflect it. As government weight in the economy rises faster, technical recessions may not appear in the official data, but citizens suffer it, nevertheless. The reader may think that this is good news because the spending of governments goes straight to the citizens via social spending. However, there is nothing that the state provides that it does not take away from the private sector now or in the future -deficit spending now means higher taxes and lower real wages afterwards-. Therefore, the flipside of “no official recession yet” is “more public debt now and after”.
The rapid decline in global money supply is staggering, at -3,4% at the end of the first quarter according to Longview. Meanwhile, in the United States, money supply is also contracting at the fastest pace since the great recession. Consider that, in the same period, government indebtedness at a global level is up 3% and
United States borrowing has also risen faster than real GDP, according to the IIF. And those deficits are financed even if the cost is higher. Governments do not care about rising borrowing costs, because you pay for it.
This all basically means a drain of liquidity for the private sector will continue for a prolonged period. Central banks scratch their heads wondering why inflation remains persistent despite the complete reversal of the supply chain disruptions and the roundtrip of the international prices of commodities, so they keep hiking rates which have a direct negative impact on families and SMEs. Large corporations have no significant problem with higher rates, as they can access credit without any problem, finance themselves at better rates than many sovereigns and most are swimming in cash after years of prudent balance sheet management. Some may go bust, but this is not a monetary tightening that will affect the mega caps in most cases.
So why does inflation, especially core CPI, not react faster to rate hikes? Because the largest economic agent in the economy does not care and is not reducing its imbalances. Bloated governments are consuming even more units of newly created money and that is why aggregate prices fail to reflect the price contraction of external factors like freight or energy. Furthermore, as we have seen in the gross domestic product figures of many European nations, the rents components of GDP show a massive increase in the tax rents side, while gross added value of businesses and the gross wage component remains below pre-pandemic levels. Congratulations, you wanted socialism, this is socialism: Lower real wages, lower real disposable income, and lower real savings.
With the current slump in money supply, inflation should be half what it is now, and this is even considering the tweaks in the official calculation of CPI. However, money velocity is not declining because state consumption of newly created currency units is rising despite poor real private consumption and investment. If we think of the quantitative theory of money,
this may be the first private-only recession because money supply declines and money velocity growth coming from the public sector offsets it.
The money supply slump and rate hike path so far are destroying the backbone of the economy, families, and small businesses.
Normalization of monetary policy without normalization of government spending and deficits is the recipe for stagnation.
................................
www.dlacalle.com
