ADVERTISEMENT

Bourbon St. Attack

You're experiencing what literally every conversation with Joes Place has been since the beginning of time. He's not well.
I can’t stand Musk and think the Cybertruck is a silly vehicle, but those were clearly fireworks. Plenty of reports of fuel canisters and fireworks in the truck bed. Not sure why this is such a sticking point.
 
From the more we learn about this man the more I am reminded of Timothy McVeigh. A man struggling post military with family and financial issues, and those vulnerabilities were identified and exploited. Both men were apparently part of a larger unit. McVeigh and Terry Nichols, and others most likely. We don’t know the full extent of of the NOLA attack, but it appears this was not carried out by a single attacker.
 
Wait a minute. They kissed and were arrested and put in prison?
I don't know how long they were jailed for. Here's an article of a couple getting deported from Kuwait. Here is a couple from Dubai who were arrested for kissing, jailed for one month, and then deported. I generally find all religions to be poor but the Muslim religion suppresses women and attempts to kill people. It's the worst offender but all have some root of corruption and coercion in them.

 
Muslims can say wtf they want. How many hindu terrorism events have happened? It's central to Islam. Don't pretend it isn't.
1984 seems pretty big to the Sikhs. Was that not religious inspired terrorism? Central to is a big conclusion to reach.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: GOHOX69
1984 seems pretty big to the Sikhs. Was that not religious inspired terrorism? Central to is a big conclusion to reach.
The Sikhs killed Indira Gandhi in 1984 and copious amount of Hindus in Punjab prior to 1984. Fyi, unlike the Sikh terrorists who should have been hung, the Hindus were prosecuted. The Sikhs also blew up innocent Hindus over Cork, Ireland in a Air India 747 called Kanishka. Maybe you've conveniently forgotten those events huh?
 
The Sikhs killed Indira Gandhi in 1984 and copious amount of Hindus in Punjab prior to 1984. Fyi, unlike the Sikh terrorists who should have been hung, the Hindus were prosecuted. The Sikhs also blew up innocent Hindus over Cork, Ireland in an Air India 747 called Kanishka. Maybe you've conveniently forgotten those events huh?
Up to 17,000 Sikhs were killed, and prosecutions didn’t happen for decades.
Were there thousands of co-conspirators in the killing of Indira Gandhi, or was it religiously fueled hatred that drove the massacres of Sikhs?
 
  • Like
Reactions: billanole
Up to 17,000 Sikhs were killed, and prosecutions didn’t happen for decades.
Were there thousands of co-conspirators in the killing of Indira Gandhi, or was it religiously fueled hatred that drove the massacres of Sikhs?
The Sikhs killed many more Hindus in Punjab. Try again.

Sometimes the majority group in a country gets tired of being massacred. You have a source for 17k? Even reputable western estimates say 3k.
 
Give it some time . . .

To think any one religion has a monopoly on violence demonstrates a stunning ignorance of history and human behavior.
To make excuses similar to saying "they all do it" is spouting ignorance of present-day events.

Nobody is concerned about what happened during Roman times or the Crusades, we are however aware of terrorists slipping across our southern border with bad intentions.
 
The Sikhs killed many more Hindus in Punjab. Try again.

Sometimes the majority group in a country gets tired of being massacred. You have a source for 17k? Even reputable western estimates say 3k.
Numbers don’t take away the motivation for the killing. The majority Hindu government had no incentive to accurately count the killings.
Is 3000 an acceptable number for religious fueled violence?
 
Not in dispute.
Yes it is. No it isn’t Yes it is. No it isn’t . Yes it is. No it isn’t.
Some scholars think based on various translations. Homosexuality especially in the Roman Empire was involving Males and young slave boys. Paul supposedly is credited with huge chunks of the New Testament. The sections involving homosexuality don’t match his language definitions. Others disagree of course. As I said it’s in dispute.Not uncommon for a 2000 year old document in a different ancient language to not have disagreements among translations.
You may be correct. But you certainly could be wrong.
 
Last edited:
Numbers don’t take away the motivation for the killing. The majority Hindu government had no incentive to accurately count the killings.
Is 3000 an acceptable number for religious fueled violence?
Yes, if your entire religion is getting genocided. If the Sikhs want, they are welcome to go to Pakistan. No need to kill Hindus. I'm sure they will be welcome with open arms by their Pakistani buddies.
 
Hey!!!


What did I say? Take it to another thread. This should be about the attack only.


Dont grind my gears


peter griffin family GIF
 
Yes, if your entire religion is getting genocided. If the Sikhs want, they are welcome to go to Pakistan. No need to kill Hindus. I'm sure they will be welcome with open arms by their Pakistani buddies.
Wiki says India is 79.8 percent Hindu and 1.7 percent Sikh. The Hindus have the numbers.
 
From the more we learn about this man the more I am reminded of Timothy McVeigh. A man struggling post military with family and financial issues, and those vulnerabilities were identified and exploited. Both men were apparently part of a larger unit. McVeigh and Terry Nichols, and others most likely. We don’t know the full extent of of the NOLA attack, but it appears this was not carried out by a single attacker.
Identified and exploited by whom and what? You're leaving off a key piece of info in your theory.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GOHOX69
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT