I think they would have to play their way into the 40s of the RPI to be considered. They would have a long way to go IMO. Clemson, with a better resume, is considered out. Pitt would have to get even with Clemson or close to that.Pitt gained 10 spots in RPI to land at #62 right now, wow.
Sent something to Burke Granger again. He said he felt like Iowa did enough to get included in the D1Baseball field, but evidently the Kendall and the others that build the field didn’t agree.
Start 2-0 and I find it hard to believe Iowa isn’t in. Barring losing to Illinois twice in the semifinals.
Might be good if Iowa could level the score with Illinois.that would be very interesting if Iowa started out 2-0 and Illinois came out of the other bracket with 1 loss to face Iowa
Imo you would have to advance to the conference title. Michigan would be an interesting case as well.that would be very interesting if Iowa started out 2-0 and Illinois came out of the other bracket with 1 loss to face Iowa
Might be good if Iowa could level the score with Illinois.
I've often had this thought. Happens every year.In other games, Kentucky knocks off Auburn. Kentucky snags 30 RPI points and is up to #51 in RPI but still has a 12-18 record in the SEC.
Alabama is up 3-1 over Arkansas in T4. Alabama would likely be #41 RPI if they win; they are 12-17 in the SEC.
It's almost as if the ACC and SEC teams are collaborating to help maximize the number of bids from the conference.
NoSo no b1g games today or what?
Alabama beating Arkansas would not be good.In other games, Kentucky knocks off Auburn. Kentucky snags 30 RPI points and is up to #51 in RPI but still has a 12-18 record in the SEC.
Alabama is up 3-1 over Arkansas in T4. Alabama would likely be #41 RPI if they win; they are 12-17 in the SEC.
It's almost as if the ACC and SEC teams are collaborating to help maximize the number of bids from the conference.
Not to mention the probably 50 point RPI swing by not getting that last strike.I think Iowa would be considered solidly in the regionals if that G2 loss wouldn't have happened. Iowa would have finished in 2nd place by themselves.
Well … it happened. 4-3 Alabama.Alabama beating Arkansas would not be good.
Still think Alabama needs one more.Well … it happened. 4-3 Alabama.
I learned last week down 13-2 to not count these guys out until the 27th out ; )its looking like you guys can stop crunching numbers
Banks is a band box with the wind blowing out. This stadium is the grand canyon.I learned last week down 13-2 to not count these guys out until the 27th out ; )
We have struggled every time we've played here offensively it seems, wonder what our best run output is over the history of playing here?Banks is a band box with the wind blowing out. This stadium is the grand canyon.
I would sure think so, RPI would be in low 50s by then I'd imagine.If Rutgers goes 0-2 are they on the bubble? That would mean they’d lose to Purdue and Iowa. He 1-3 vs Iowa and 3-7 vs the top five in the league. Not to mention the unreal amount of quad four games they have.
2014: 2,2,1 (1-2 record)We have struggled every time we've played here offensively it seems, wonder what our best run output is over the history of playing here?
Couple of wins today will change that. Also rooting against Pitt, Alabama, Kentucky, ODU, etcFYI FWIW neither projection has Iowa anywhere close to the bubble anymore
Only reason why and ACCI really, really don’t understand Clemson as a bubble team. RPI, I know…
Did they update Indiana yet? I’m still showing them getting beat by Maryland.Iowa's RPI is 59 currently
Explain to me how Maryland is supposedly the 9th ranked team in the country......and Iowa is just as good as Maryland...........and they're a lock for the tourney and we may not even f***ing get in unless we make the BTCG?Iowa #60 RPI. Michigan is worth 22 points if you win.
Most likely it knocks someone else out. Iowa wasn't getting in regardless. RPI of 60 is too low.Does Michigan winning the tourney screw Iowa in the bids?
Hopefully that gets spammed towards the committee, regardless of how little they care..................Lets put a bow on this with some results from the regionals this weekend.
Last 4: combined 2-6
Florida State 0-2
Grand Canyon 0-2
Liberty 0-2
Ole Miss 2-0
Other bubble teams: 3-5 (2 wins vs 4 seeds)
Dallas Baptist 0-2
Georgia Tech 2-2
Wake Forest 1-2
Big Ten: 5-2
Iowa faced 5 tourney teams and went 7-5 against those teams during the season. Those teams have gone 10-7 in regionals.
I think it is safe to say the committee got it wrong, the B1G was undervalued, and Iowa should have been in the field. The ASUN (15) and WAC (19) had no business being multi-bid leagues. DBU barely finished .500 in the 9th best conference. The ACC is not as strong as it was perceived going in to the tourney.
Against umps: 0-2B1G results:
vs. #1 seed: 1-2
vs. #2 seed: 2-0
vs. #3 seed: 1-2
vs. #4 seed: 1-0
Overall: 5-4
vs. ACC: 2-2
vs. Big East: 1-2
vs. Pac-12: 1-0
vs. NEC: 1-0
Against higher seeds: 2-2
Against lower seeds: 3-2