Cali recall election is already froth with fraud - No surprise here!

[TJ8869]

Actually, JP didn't say the claims, "couldn't actually be true." He said it was interesting that the claims were made before the election started. You actually jumped to an inference there.

You're correct that early voted had started (I voted about two weeks ago myself), but it seemed pretty clear JP was referring to the fact that election day hadn't happened.

So you're both right.

Please kiss and make up.

He was quite clear that any claims of fraud were nonsense because the election hadn't even started yet. What those voters claimed happened to them did in fact happen, and it doesn't matter that it wasn't election day yet or that they hadn't started counting ballots yet. If JP had acknowledged that a number of people were incorrectly told they had already voted but it was nothing nefarious then he would be correct.

But that's not what he did. He mockingly dismissed everything in the OP - and that glitch was the crux of OP's post - on the basis that the election hadn't even started yet.

Even after I corrected his mistake, he could have acknowledged my point. But he didn't. He went all-in on stupid instead, and now he's deliberately and repeatedly lying about what I wrote because he can't cope with being wrong.

 

[noStemsnoSTICKS]

He was quite clear that any claims of fraud were nonsense because the election hadn't even started yet. What those voters claimed happened to them did in fact happen, and it doesn't matter that it wasn't election day yet or that they hadn't started counting ballots yet. If JP had acknowledged that a number of people were incorrectly told they had already voted but it was nothing nefarious then he would be correct.

But that's not what he did. He mockingly dismissed everything in the OP - and that glitch was the crux of OP's post - on the basis that the election hadn't even started yet.

Even after I corrected his mistake, he could have acknowledged my point. But he didn't. He went all-in on stupid instead, and now he's deliberately and repeatedly lying about what I wrote because he can't cope with being wrong.

But OP's main point was that liberals were creating election fraud again. A point you've gone out of your way to disagree with. So if JP was throwing shade at the OP--for something you agree with him about--why are your panties so bunched up on this?

 

[TJ8869]

But OP's main point was that liberals were creating election fraud again. A point you've gone out of your way to disagree with. So if JP was throwing shade at the OP--for something you agree with him about--why are your panties so bunched up on this?

OP didn’t immediately start lying about what I posted.

JP did. JP always does.

 

[Joes Place]

No, I didn't.

Yes. Entire Thread.

PWNED

 

[Joes Place]

But OP's main point was that liberals were creating election fraud again. A point you've gone out of your way to disagree with. So if JP was throwing shade at the OP--for something you agree with him about--why are your panties so bunched up on this?

He's an idiot. Cut him some slack.

 

[gusto79]

OP didn’t immediately start lying about what I posted.

JP did. JP always does.

But why didn't you respond to the OP? He claims liberals are doing the voter fraud again. You've made it clear this is incorrect and you don't agree with that statement. But instead of addressing OP you reply to Joe.