ADVERTISEMENT

Caliphate vs the Crusades

A little boy throws rocks at a hornet's nest. When one finally connects, he is swarmed upon and stung repeatedly. He runs crying to Mommy, who soothes the bites and tells him, "It's not your fault. We just need to kill all the terrible hornets so they won't bother you ever again"

That, in a nutshell, is American foreign policy: sheer lunacy.:(

Actually, the first little boy throwing rocks was a Muslim.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Barbary_War
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hawk in SEC Country
Actually, the first little boy throwing rocks was a Muslim.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Barbary_War
The war ended when the U.S. naval fleet under Commodore Stephen Decatur captured several Algerian ships and threatened to bombard Algiers Harbor. Decatur became a national hero, and he delivered a toast at a banquet in his honor: “Our country! In her intercourse with foreign nations may she always be right; but our country, right or wrong.”

The Barbary Wars legitimized the U.S. military in the eyes of the world. They also increased military expenditures, and they made commercial shippers more reliant on government for protection. Moreover, the wars set an alarming precedent that future presidents seized upon: the notion that armed personnel can be deployed for combat without a congressional declaration of war.
https://waltercoffey.wordpress.com/2013/08/30/the-barbary-wars/
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
Moreover, the wars set an alarming precedent that future presidents seized upon: the notion that armed personnel can be deployed for combat without a congressional declaration of war.

https://waltercoffey.wordpress.com/2013/08/30/the-barbary-wars/

Well, I'll take Jefferson's interpretation of the war clause over that of you or Walter, because, you know... Jefferson was actually involved in the creation and passage of the constitution and y'all weren't?
 
We have been raining down death and destruction on the ME for a quarter century. Undeclared wars, one after another.
Let's just GTFO and stay out.

It's been said : war is the weapon of choice for the rich to terrorize the poor. And terror is the only weapon available when the poor are forced to wage war on the rich.

Muslims are no different than Vietnamese or Koreans, Germans or Japanese. But we must dehumanize them before we can destroy them. The collective conscience of the American sheeple demand this. :rolleyes:

Are you comparing Muslims to the North Vietnamese, North Koreans, the Japan that attacked Pearl Harbor and declared war on the U.S. afterwards, and Hitler's Germany?
 
Well, I'll take Jefferson's interpretation of the war clause over that of you or Walter, because, you know... Jefferson was actually involved in the creation and passage of the constitution and y'all weren't?
Are you referring to Thomas "all men are created equal, except for the black ones that all us rich white folk bought and paid for" Jefferson??

:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D
 
Are you comparing Muslims to the North Vietnamese, North Koreans, the Japan that attacked Pearl Harbor and declared war on the U.S. afterwards, and Hitler's Germany?
This country has a history that is based on war. There are banking/industrial interests that have drummed up one war after another, especially in the past 100 years.

In that regard, yes - Muslims are no different than any other group. They are demonized by the government and media so that the people will go along with one military invasion after another.

War means big $$$ for big business and they laugh their collective asses off all the way to the bank at society's inability to discern between actual threats and pure propaganda. What did Barry, the guy who's been called a closet Muslim, do in the first few days of his presidency? He bombed the hell out of Pakistan: which is what we've come to expect out of a Nobel Peace winner in this country. It's how we roll.

Cuz we all know those Vietnamese rice farmers were going to dig up their AK 47's out of the mud, jump in a bunch of leaky little dinghys and sail across the ocean to take over this country. :p

Follow the money: this ain't rocket science.
 
This country has a history that is based on war. There are banking/industrial interests that have drummed up one war after another, especially in the past 100 years.

In that regard, yes - Muslims are no different than any other group. They are demonized by the government and media so that the people will go along with one military invasion after another.

War means big $$$ for big business and they laugh their collective asses off all the way to the bank at society's inability to discern between actual threats and pure propaganda. What did Barry, the guy who's been called a closet Muslim, do in the first few days of his presidency? He bombed the hell out of Pakistan: which is what we've come to expect out of a Nobel Peace winner in this country. It's how we roll.

Cuz we all know those Vietnamese rice farmers were going to dig up their AK 47's out of the mud, jump in a bunch of leaky little dinghys and sail across the ocean to take over this country. :p

Follow the money: this ain't rocket science.


It sounds like what you're saying is going to war with Germany was the wrong thing to do, because it was all about the money, in your opinion. Were we supposed to ignore that they had taken over all of Europe?
 
We sure are a cowardly people. We'd watch 10,000 people die because maybe 1 of those 10,000 might be a terrorist.

Not going to support letting thousands of people hung out to dry to be killed by ISIS because we're that afraid of terrorism.

And our politicians simply refuse to call out the Saudi ties to the militant Islamic groups which are responsible for the attacks against the West.

The Alawites and Sunni Syrians have never carried out an attack on US or French soil. The Saudi-related Wahhabi have many times...
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
Are you referring to Thomas "all men are created equal, except for the black ones that all us rich white folk bought and paid for" Jefferson??

:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D
This is ignorant. You can't apply morals of today to someone over 200 years ago.
 
Just a different time period right? By all means though let us demon every single little brown person because a small fraction of Muslims are terrorists. By all means let us live in fear and block our borders and really show we are scared of the little brown person. 21st century and we still live in fear of other cultures, it is pathetic. How many "homegrown" deaths have we had this past year from school shootings, gang culture and otherwise "acceptable? violence." But by all means let's shut down our borders because we are so secure inside all ready.

Learned a lot about people and friends these past few days and it is disgusting.
Islam spread in the 7-10 centuries for the sole purpose of conquering and converting people to their religion. You convert, or die, or you pay a tax to stay alive and not convert. While the crusades were most definitely about territory, they were in no way an attempt to convert or destroy.
 
How is it that someone who is for welcoming in refugees is the coward, and the person (you) who is afraid to let them in is not? It appears to me that you're the one who's afraid of terrorism.


Apparently, reading comprehension isn't Garry''s strong point.

When the WTC's fell what did you do about it? Exactly. You didn't do a damn thing. You're just another ignorant poster.

In fact, what you're actually saying is that your willing to risk the lives of your family and neighbor. You're willing to let Americans die just so you can feel good about letting some refugees in.

You ever ask yourself why other ME countries aren't wanting to take in these refugees? If you were actually informed about the subject, you would know the answer to that question.

You're not informed on anything. You the poster who constantly posts articles. You've never actually had an original thought. You're just another profile picture changer on Facebook. You actually think your doing something about terrorism by overlaying the French flag across your picture.

You're going to sit there and claim you're not afraid of terrorism when you've never actually done anything about. All you've done is sit at home safe and sound and bad mouth the soldiers making sure you're allowed to sit on your ass and do nothing.

You're the worst type of American. An American who would rather see his country burn than do anything to protect it.
 
This is ignorant. You can't apply morals of today to someone over 200 years ago.
You can't? Please tell me at what point slavery stopped being a 'grey' issue and became black and white. Was it when "Honest Abe" said so?

Was murder acceptable in the days of Cain and Abel because it hadn't yet been codified into law by some legislator? Morals don't change from generation to generation - I'm sorry but they just don't.
 
You can't? Please tell me at what point slavery stopped being a 'grey' issue and became black and white. Was it when "Honest Abe" said so?

Was murder acceptable in the days of Cain and Abel because it hadn't yet been codified into law by some legislator? Morals don't change from generation to generation - I'm sorry but they just don't.
Hey go ahead.... double down on stupid...
 
It sounds like what you're saying is going to war with Germany was the wrong thing to do, because it was all about the money, in your opinion. Were we supposed to ignore that they had taken over all of Europe?
Yes, I believe it was the wrong thing to do.

War leaves every country with three armies: an army of cripples, an army of mourners and an army of profiteers and thieves. (Taken from a German proverb).

War doesn't happen, war is chosen. It's been this way for thousands of years and unfortunately, looks to continue for thousands more.:(
 
Yes, I believe it was the wrong thing to do.

War leaves every country with three armies: an army of cripples, an army of mourners and an army of profiteers and thieves. (Taken from a German proverb).

War doesn't happen, war is chosen. It's been this way for thousands of years and unfortunately, looks to continue for thousands more.:(

Interesting. Do you think Hitler would have stopped with Europe?
 
We sure are a cowardly people. We'd watch 10,000 people die because maybe 1 of those 10,000 might be a terrorist.

Not going to support letting thousands of people hung out to dry to be killed by ISIS because we're that afraid of terrorism.

I have 10,000 apples. I have injected 100 with arsenic.

How many are you going to let your children eat?
 
  • Like
Reactions: GarryO37
Our very rigorous screening system. Of course no system is perfect, and one might slip through here and there, but that's hardly the excuse for the cowardly behavior and abandonment of American principles being displayed by the right in this situation.

Ciggy got his talking points. Every time I hear a Dem talking about screening or vetting....it's 'rigorous'.

What is so rigorous about it? Are we checking Syrian criminal records? Looking at Syrian drivers licenses? Asking 'are you a terrorist'? How hard is it to get forged documents from Syria? Or for that matter, to just bribe a government official to get real papers with false information?

Why can't we pause just to review just how 'rigorous' this process is? If we really feel like we have a handle on it then I'm fine with refugees. If not, wait until we get a better system in place before resuming.

Now this is be part where Huey is supposed to call me a racist.
 
Last edited:
I don't know. Do you think he would have had anything left after defeating the Red Army, if in fact he was capable of defeating them at all?
https://orangeraisin.wordpress.com/2010/06/24/did-the-red-army-defeat-the-third-reich/

I don't know. After pushing through Europe so quickly, would the Europeans have continued their resistance if we hadn't gotten involved? And if they would have given up, I'd imagine Hitler would have sent far more troops to the Eastern Front. Had we not gotten involved, would we have supplied the Red Army with 11 Billion Dollars in supplies in the form of locomotives, tanks, aircraft, trucks, and artillery?

A lot of questions.
 
Yes, I believe it was the wrong thing to do.

War leaves every country with three armies: an army of cripples, an army of mourners and an army of profiteers and thieves. (Taken from a German proverb).

War doesn't happen, war is chosen. It's been this way for thousands of years and unfortunately, looks to continue for thousands more.:(
So much fail in this thread. And you dared to discuss morality in another post.
If you didn't care to have the US enter world war II then there is no need for a military at all.
Also, you obviously are not for any refugee's coming here as well, if killing millions is acceptable than I guess there's no need for them to come here.
 
A little boy throws rocks at a hornet's nest. When one finally connects, he is swarmed upon and stung repeatedly. He runs crying to Mommy, who soothes the bites and tells him, "It's not your fault. We just need to kill all the terrible hornets so they won't bother you ever again"

That, in a nutshell, is American foreign policy: sheer lunacy.:(

Hornet's don't bite.
 
I have 10,000 apples. I have injected 100 with arsenic.

How many are you going to let your children eat?

Noooo...you have 10,000 apples and someone told you that one might have been injected with arsenic but all the apples will be checked to the best of our ability and YOU decide instead to throw the 10,000 apples away.

BTW, cyanide occurs in apples naturally. Guess you won't eat them.
 
I have 10,000 apples. I have injected 100 with arsenic.

How many are you going to let your children eat?

Apples are not people who are fleeing from oppression and certain death.

I'm not saying we let them in just because they exist, I'm not even saying we let them in because they want an opportunity at a better life.

I'm saying we let them in because they have no where else to go and live.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
Just a different time period right? By all means though let us demon every single little brown person because a small fraction of Muslims are terrorists. By all means let us live in fear and block our borders and really show we are scared of the little brown person. 21st century and we still live in fear of other cultures, it is pathetic. How many "homegrown" deaths have we had this past year from school shootings, gang culture and otherwise "acceptable? violence." But by all means let's shut down our borders because we are so secure inside all ready.

Learned a lot about people and friends these past few days and it is disgusting.

Amazing how liberals don't understand muslim faith.
 
Noooo...you have 10,000 apples and someone told you that one might have been injected with arsenic but all the apples will be checked to the best of our ability and YOU decide instead to throw the 10,000 apples away.

BTW, cyanide occurs in apples naturally. Guess you won't eat them.

And formaldehyde occurs naturally in soybeans.

We have ISIS stating for over a year that agents have been embedded inside the refugees and sleeper agents. So many refugees are traveling with no identification at all, and fake passports are all over the place.

You're really wanting to play roulette with this?

I'm not saying to not let refugees in. But we have to keep them at arms length, then monitor them extremely close once we have done the best we can.

Or better yet....... Allow zero in, until we find housing, help, and work for every homeless person inside this country. OR accept refugees and encamp them inside other Arab nations...... The force those nations to do pay the bill for their inaction.
 
This country has a history that is based on war. There are banking/industrial interests that have drummed up one war after another, especially in the past 100 years.

In that regard, yes - Muslims are no different than any other group. They are demonized by the government and media so that the people will go along with one military invasion after another.

War means big $$$ for big business and they laugh their collective asses off all the way to the bank at society's inability to discern between actual threats and pure propaganda. What did Barry, the guy who's been called a closet Muslim, do in the first few days of his presidency? He bombed the hell out of Pakistan: which is what we've come to expect out of a Nobel Peace winner in this country. It's how we roll.

Cuz we all know those Vietnamese rice farmers were going to dig up their AK 47's out of the mud, jump in a bunch of leaky little dinghys and sail across the ocean to take over this country. :p

Follow the money: this ain't rocket science.

Why would you believe that muslims are the same as everyone else? Obviously you don't understand what they believe to be acceptable.
 
I don't know. After pushing through Europe so quickly, would the Europeans have continued their resistance if we hadn't gotten involved? And if they would have given up, I'd imagine Hitler would have sent far more troops to the Eastern Front. Had we not gotten involved, would we have supplied the Red Army with 11 Billion Dollars in supplies in the form of locomotives, tanks, aircraft, trucks, and artillery?

A lot of questions.
The article I linked was basically a response to an essay that claimed Russia would have taken care of the Nazis and did a pretty good job of examining both sides. You're right - a lot of questions that will probably never be answered.
 
So much fail in this thread. And you dared to discuss morality in another post.
If you didn't care to have the US enter world war II then there is no need for a military at all.
Also, you obviously are not for any refugee's coming here as well, if killing millions is acceptable than I guess there's no need for them to come here.
I dared to bring up the morality of slavery and the hypocrisy of a slave-owner claiming "all men are created equal." Sue me.

There is no need for a military in a vast country with 300,000,000 armed citizens, surrounded on both sides by oceans.

I am for ending government welfare programs. If that is done I really don't care if we build walls around the country or welcome anyone and everyone with welcome arms.
 
The article I linked was basically a response to an essay that claimed Russia would have taken care of the Nazis and did a pretty good job of examining both sides. You're right - a lot of questions that will probably never be answered.

LOL. I didn't click on your link, but Googled it. And I ended up reading the same article. Towards the bottom you'll see where they talk about the 11 Billion in support given to the Russians. Also, that link seemed to be someone that disagreed with the premise that the Red Army would have done it on their own. The guy in the article was dissecting the essay you're talking about.
 
Last edited:
Holy....holy....shit
What an articulate, well thought out response......................................to something that I didn't say. What I did say was that going to war against Germany was wrong for us. Europeans, especially Germans, were the ones that needed to stop him: it shouldn't be our fight from half a world away. But the Bush clan and their elitist billionaire buddies appreciated our support greatly I'm sure. I doubt that a single tear was shed by the war profiteers over the millions who paid dearly.

Communism has killed tens of millions of people since WWII. Why didn't we invade Russia to stop it's evil spread around the Europe and Asia? Is it a more acceptable kind of evil than Nazism? We invaded the South to free the slaves; invaded Germany to free the Jews; why stop there? Please tell me why we chose to ignore those poor victims of an ideology every bit as evil as the Third Reich?
 
LOL. I didn't click on your link, but Googled it. And I ended up reading the same article. Towards the bottom you'll see where they talk about the 11 Billion in support given to the Russians. Also, that link seemed to be someone that disagreed with the premise that the Red Army would have done it on their own. The guy in the article was dissecting the essay you're talking about.
I agree: I don't know how it would have ended had the Nazis fought it out with the Reds and wasn't disagreeing with the author of that dissection. But to me it would have been preferable to the US becoming involved - and I don't think we would be learning German or Russian as a primary language had either of them won.

Have a good day.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT