ADVERTISEMENT

Capitol Notebook: Iowa lawmakers advance ticket surcharge proposal

cigaretteman

HR King
May 29, 2001
77,489
58,975
113
Iowa cities could charge ticket holders, hotel guests and others to help pay for infrastructure improvements to facilitate the development of sports arenas, concert venues and other attractions under a bill advanced by House lawmakers.


House File 412 would allow cities to impose up to a 3 percent surcharge on retail, food, alcohol, ticket and hotel room sales within a designated entertainment district.


The proposed entertainment area could consist only of properties zoned for commercial uses or properties within a designated historic district. At least 75 percent of the properties must be cultural, entertainment, food, liquor or lodging establishments expected to draw a combined annual attendance of more than 250,000 people.


Advertisement

Rep. Brian Lohse, a Republican from Bondurant, put forward the bill.


Lohse previously served on the Bondurant City Council and noted the difficulty city officials had trying to pay for infrastructure improvements needed to facilitate the public-private development of a prospective soccer stadium and arena.


Lohse said a surcharge would help cities subsidize part of the cost to lure economic development projects, bolster Iowa tourism and shift the extra tax burden away from property tax owners — who may or may not frequent the entertainment district — to users, including visitors.


Lohse pointed to the TBK Bank Sports Complex in Bettendorf as a good example of an area where the bill could apply.


Daniel Stalder, representing the Iowa League of Cities, also pointed to the Council Bluffs area.


“I think something like this could help the Council Bluffs area stay competitive,” after Nebraska authorized casino gaming, Stalder said. “I think near the border where we see people potentially coming into Iowa is exactly where this sort of thing was designed and built for.”


On Iowa Politics​


Newsletter Signup
checkmark-yellow.png
Legislative & Politics News Delivered to your inbox each weekday






Doug Struyk, a lobbyist representing the cities of Des Moines and Waukee, said the bill provides cities new opportunities to develop entertainment options that draw more people to their communities, by investing in infrastructure without putting it on the back of property taxpayers.


Stalder, too, argued the bill provides “an abundance for checks and process to prevent something from going in place that’s not appreciated locally,” as well as public transparency.


At least 25 percent of all property owners within the proposed entertainment area would be needed for a city to initiate proceedings to adopt an ordinance to establish a surcharge, which would require a public hearing and providing at least 15 days notice to each owner of property within the proposed entertainment area.


A three-fourths majority of city council members would be required to adopt a surcharge, or an affirmative vote of two members for cities with three-member councils. However, should at least 25 percent of property owners within the proposed area protest the proposed surcharge, adoption would require a unanimous vote of city council.


The proposal would be forced to be withdrawn if 40 percent or more of all property owners in the proposed entertainment district file a petition in opposition.


Victoria Sinclair, with Iowans for Tax Relief, contends the bill “plain and simply” amounts to a tax increase.


Jessica Dunker, president and CEO of the Iowa Restaurant Association, raised concerns about one company owning a majority of property overruling and drowning out the voices and wishes of individual operators running the hospitality businesses within a district.


Eric Goranson, a lobbyist representing the Iowa Hotel & Lodging Association, echoed those concerns.


Lohse said the bill will likely be amended in committee to raise the threshold to 60 percent of landowners and operators that would have to approve, as well as clarifying money collected through the surcharge would have to be reinvested in the entertainment district.


A three-member subcommittee advanced the bill to the full House Appropriations Committee.


Iowa unemployment rate dips​


Iowa’s unemployment rate dropped below 3 percent for the first time since August last month, according to Iowa Workforce Development.


The rate fell to 2.9 percent in February, down from 3 percent in January. In the same span, the national unemployment rate increased from 3.4 percent to 3.6 percent.


Iowa Workforce Development director Beth Townsend said in a news release the state has weathered pressures of higher interest rates and inflation to maintain low unemployment.


“Our economy has increased the number of jobs by more than 8,000 since the beginning of the pandemic,” she said. “All of this demonstrates the resiliency of the Iowa economy despite major national headwinds.”


The labor force — those either employed or looking for work — increased by 100 people, while the number of employed Iowans increased by 1,300.

 
How is tourism supposed to pay for infrastructure? Iowa isn't exactly a destination place.
 
How is tourism supposed to pay for infrastructure? Iowa isn't exactly a destination place.
Just this past weekend Des Moines had the NCAA basketball tournament. There are a lot of events/concerts that bring people in to use the facilities that are being discussed.
 
I don't think this is necessarily a bad idea at first glance, but make no mistake, this is a TAX INCREASE. You can call it a "surcharge", but that doesn't change what's actually going on with this. And it will be the locals that end up contributing the majority of those "surcharges", especially in the smaller towns and cities.

It looks to me like a lobbyist inspired piece of legislation to prop up the Iowa based casinos that are struggling.
 
No.

As it stands the local voters have to approve them anyway. God forbid we let local voters make decisions.
They are trying to though, if this proposal made it through the funnel:



Iowa Senate lawmakers on Tuesday advanced a bill aimed at providing property tax reductions while setting a consistent sales tax rate across the state.

The bill, Senate Study Bill 1125, would increase the sales tax from 6 percent to 7 percent and eliminate the local-option sales tax, a mechanism most local governments use that imposes a one-cent sales tax on top of the state rate. Local governments would receive a portion of the state sales tax revenue to make up for the lost revenue.

The tax increase would sunset in 2051, when it would go back to 6 percent.

Advertisement

A portion of the state sales tax would also go to fund the Natural Resources and Outdoor Recreation Trust Fund, an outdoors and water quality fund that was created by a constitutional amendment in 2010 but has remained unfunded.
 
They are trying to though, if this proposal made it through the funnel:



Iowa Senate lawmakers on Tuesday advanced a bill aimed at providing property tax reductions while setting a consistent sales tax rate across the state.

The bill, Senate Study Bill 1125, would increase the sales tax from 6 percent to 7 percent and eliminate the local-option sales tax, a mechanism most local governments use that imposes a one-cent sales tax on top of the state rate. Local governments would receive a portion of the state sales tax revenue to make up for the lost revenue.

The tax increase would sunset in 2051, when it would go back to 6 percent.

Advertisement

A portion of the state sales tax would also go to fund the Natural Resources and Outdoor Recreation Trust Fund, an outdoors and water quality fund that was created by a constitutional amendment in 2010 but has remained unfunded.

That will become a forgotten promise and will never happen. By 2051 the Iowa State sales tax might be pushing 10%.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
They are trying to though, if this proposal made it through the funnel:



Iowa Senate lawmakers on Tuesday advanced a bill aimed at providing property tax reductions while setting a consistent sales tax rate across the state.

The bill, Senate Study Bill 1125, would increase the sales tax from 6 percent to 7 percent and eliminate the local-option sales tax, a mechanism most local governments use that imposes a one-cent sales tax on top of the state rate. Local governments would receive a portion of the state sales tax revenue to make up for the lost revenue.

The tax increase would sunset in 2051, when it would go back to 6 percent.

Advertisement

A portion of the state sales tax would also go to fund the Natural Resources and Outdoor Recreation Trust Fund, an outdoors and water quality fund that was created by a constitutional amendment in 2010 but has remained unfunded.

Well I can tell you what will happen.

Lots of local governments enacting franchise fees on utilities to replace the money. Some do it already.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT