Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The data - like politicians - are simply purchased by Pfizer, et al.
Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial
Revelations of poor practices at a contract research company helping to carry out Pfizer’s pivotal covid-19 vaccine trial raise questions about data integrity and regulatory oversight. Paul D Thacker reports In autumn 2020 Pfizer’s chairman and chief executive, Albert Bourla, released an open...www.bmj.com
Security video of her time there."during the two weeks she was employed at Ventavia in September 2020"
Wow.
Really blowing the place up there.
Sounds like they probably got rid of her because she was incompetent or something. No reason for her to make shit up after being canned. 🙄
Credibility rating:"during the two weeks she was employed at Ventavia in September 2020"
Wow.
Really blowing the place up there.
Sounds like they probably got rid of her because she was incompetent or something. No reason for her to make shit up after being canned. 🙄
Speaking of purchased by Pfizer."during the two weeks she was employed at Ventavia in September 2020"
Wow.
Really blowing the place up there.
Sounds like they probably got rid of her because she was incompetent or something. No reason for her to make shit up after being canned. 🙄
Damn
Again WRONG.So there is zero data proving that the vaccine limits transmission and abundant data showing that Covid poses virtually no risk to a 5-12 year old child.
So that Moms can look good in front of their friends at the book club.So there is zero data proving that the vaccine limits transmission and abundant data showing that Covid poses virtually no risk to a 5-12 year old child.
Why would you vaccinate your child again?
So that Moms can look good in front of their friends at the book club.
So there is zero data proving that the vaccine limits transmission and abundant data showing that Covid poses virtually no risk to a 5-12 year old child.
Why would you vaccinate your child again?
The AAP* is a walking, talking conflict of interest that has taken millions from Big Pharma.
Take everything they say with a grain of salt.
*Awesome Advocates for Pfizer
You...Are....A....MoronThe AAP* is a walking, talking conflict of interest that has taken millions from Big Pharma.
Take everything they say with a grain of salt.
*Awesome Advocates for Pfizer
The AAP* is a walking, talking conflict of interest that has taken millions from Big Pharma.
Again WRONG.
Adverse events from the virus exceed those from the vaccine by a significant margin.
Look, it’s Joe bro again! Please share that data on kids under 12.
Safety data from the trials, which included more than 3,000 children who received the vaccine, found the most common reactions were pain at the injection site, fatigue and headache. Reactions were mostly mild or moderate. There were no serious adverse events related to the vaccine, including myocarditis or anaphylaxis.
I would love to get even a tiny fraction of these payouts shank and his ilk say we get. I can't even get a pen anymore."millions"?
It's an organization consisting of thousands of board-certified pediatricians.
Did they ALL get "payouts"?
Dude, it is religion to them.So the safety data includes long term observation past 4 months? Oops, no. Again, this patient population does not get sick from Covid. Why would you ever subject an immature body to an untested vaccine for no reason. I am pro vaccine for adults. The reward outweighs the risk.
So the safety data includes long term observation past 4 months?
And by the way, for the Joe bros and Kennys of the world, start pushing parents to give their 6 year old a shot with no long term safety data
How many mRNA vaccines do we have history of?Again: In the entire history of vaccines, adverse events from the vaccines have shown up within 6-8 weeks. Every time.
4 months is more than ample.
Bullshit. Why did they drop Dengue and RSV trial fiascos, just to name two?Again: In the entire history of vaccines, adverse events from the vaccines have shown up within 6-8 weeks. Every time.
4 months is more than ample.
5-11 year olds are a primary vector of transmission?Great news!
Now maybe we can all move on from masks once all the children have had time to get their 2nd shot.
With packed arenas/stadiums each week with no explosion in cases, it is time for the Mask requirements to end now that the shot since this demographic is now able to have access to the shot
Already happening in San Fran.And by the way, for the Joe bros and Kennys of the world, start pushing parents to give their 6 year old a shot with no long term safety data and even pro bad parents will tell you to pound sand. It will be a political nightmare for the dems.
Were you there Joe? Bedside manners and all? You really believe this garbage don’t you? Sheep.4 months IS "long-term safety data".
Pediatricians are recommending it.
Did you miss where the ER doc asked patients going on vents why they didn't get their vaccines? They said people on Twitter and FB said it was "unsafe". When she asked them if they had talked directly to their physician about the vaccines, not a single one had.
Zero.
How many mRNA vaccines do we have history of?
Were you there Joe?