If it were all that black and white of course... but you know it isn't bc you're not that dumb. It's also why you keep repeating it in this thread.
It also implies a level of acceptance of political corruption which is the larger point I'm making.
CEO JP Morgan on Trump
- Thread starter biggreydogs
- Start date
- Status
It also implies a level of acceptance of political corruption which is the larger point I'm making.
- Sep 13, 2002
- 98,529
- 206,124
- 113
There is nothing political about pulling down a woman's pants and jamming your finger in her vagina. Which is what the jury in the Trump trial determined Trump did to E. Jean Carrol.
I understand why you and other Trump supporters don't like this talked about, but that's your problem.
Have you really gone full nutjob or is this an act? We all knew you took a leap that direction during covid but really? You should at least pretend to have some perspective and common sense so every one doesn't view you as another Chis.
Last edited:
To be fair I highly doubt history and politics are the only aspects of their lives they are clueless at
You and I agree about RDS getting more done than Trump.
But Dimon was talking about what Trump DID in his first term that his voters liked and which were not bad in hindsight.
At no point did I hear Dimon say this is why Trump should get a second term - which I agree with.
- Sep 13, 2002
- 98,529
- 206,124
- 113
Is this something a judge wrote or not?
The jury’s finding of sexual abuse therefore necessarily implies that it found that Mr. Trump forcibly penetrated her vagina,” Kaplan wrote.
Unless you say the judge and jury are liars, Trump has been proven to have jammed his finger in a woman's vagina against her will.
I don't understand why this doesn't bother you.
What bothers me is supposedly intelligent people acting dumb to score political points. Or maybe I'm giving you too much credit.
It was a civil trial, not a criminal one so he wasn't found guilty of anything. And as you know, the burden of proof and defendants rights in a civil case are significantly different.
Not only that, the jury didn't even find him liable for rape.
Your claiming he's a convicted rapist is both dumb and false on multiple levels.
Constantly repeating it makes you look foolish and desperate.
- Sep 13, 2002
- 98,529
- 206,124
- 113
You are in denial.
A jury determined Donald Trump jammed a finger into a woman's vagina against her will.
Is that fact or not?
Whether it was criminal court or civil, whether NY law considers digital penetration "sexual abuse" while other states call it "rape" - those things are frankly irrelevant.
What is relevant is a jury of his peers determined Donald Trump jammed a finger into a woman's vagina against her will.
That should bother you. That should bother ANY human being with a shred of decency.
The only logical, rational conclusion to come to is that YOU are the one more concerned about "scoring political points" or whether Trump's policies are superior to Biden's than the fact he is a criminal and a rapist. That makes you the ethically and morally challenged one in this scenario.
If Donald Trump's policy positions were guaranteed to make me rich and make the U.S. economy grow at an unprecedented rate, I still wouldn't vote for the piece of shit because he's a lying criminal and a rapist. But then, I have a moral compass.
Last edited:
BY JUSTIN HASKINS, OPINION CONTRIBUTOR - 12/04/21This is a great example of exactly how brainwashed most of you on the left are on this topic... this lie has been repeated enough that you all just take it as fact now, when it's complete bs.
Income data published by the IRS clearly show that on average all income brackets benefited substantially from the Republicans’ tax reform law, with the biggest beneficiaries being working and middle-income filers, not the top 1 percent, as so many Democrats have argued.
A careful analysis of the IRS tax data, one that includes the effects of tax credits and other reforms to the tax code, shows that filers with an adjusted gross income (AGI) of $15,000 to $50,000 enjoyed an average tax cut of 16 percent to 26 percent in 2018, the first year Republicans’ Tax Cuts and Jobs Act went into effect and the most recent year for which data is available.
Filers who earned $50,000 to $100,000 received a tax break of about 15 percent to 17 percent, and those earning $100,000 to $500,000 in adjusted gross income saw their personal income taxes cut by around 11 percent to 13 percent.
By comparison, no income group with an AGI of at least $500,000 received an average tax cut exceeding 9 percent, and the average tax cut for brackets starting at $1 million was less than 6 percent. (For more detailed data, see my table published here.)
That means most middle-income and working-class earners enjoyed a tax cut that was at least double the size of tax cuts received by households earning $1 million or more.
IRS data proves Trump tax cuts benefited middle, working-class Americans most
Republicans’ 2017 tax reform law did exactly what was promised: It lowered taxes for all income groups.thehill.com
Justin Haskins is the Editorial Director and a research fellow at The Heartland Institute
The Heartland Institute is an American conservative and libertarian public policy think tank known for its rejection of both the scientific consensus on climate change and the negative health impacts of smoking.
Do you morons ever check your sources??
Last edited:
Yes, but here is what I'm talking about. Those aren't necessarily policies (the tax cut is) as much as they are basic stances on an issue. If I say, I want a good economy that isn't a policy as much as it is an opinion or stance. For example, Trump never had an actual healthcare policy, just a stance that Obamacare was bad. That's why he didn't get anything done on that front.
If you want to get things done, you have to be focused and have clear cut objectives with a detailed plan to get there. Trump has literally none of those things and either do most of the bozos he had and has working for him. He cut out the few ones that actually could. Hell, his tax plan and "health plan" were directly taken from Paul Ryan.
So he's faking the link to the IRS data? There's piles of info out there for people who want to find actual facts. The percentage changes in the tax code by income bracket were public knowledge and on the irs website for shits sake.
Last edited:
IRS data is one thing, picking and choosing how to show those to match a narrative is another.
Marxism is actually a lot more democratic than our current economic arrangement. However I wouldn't expect someone like you, who obviously has no idea what they're talking about, to understand that.
Maybe look it up? Educating yourself about something you use regularly as what you think is an insult might make you appear a little less stupid.
Calling anyone in our current government a marxist is hilarious though.
Let me know if you'd like a summary! I'd be happy to provide it to you and the other numpties.
Are you ok with a person being elected president who has been found by a civil jury to have committed the act of sexual assault?
Or maybe you are a shitlib who can't stand hearing anything that isn't negative about Trump.
- Status
