ADVERTISEMENT

CKLV Results

Just watched Greg D vs Heinselman and Heinselman made Greg look small and he’s obviously not a big 125lber himself. Greg D is tiny. Whose bigger him or McHenry? Lol. They’re both very small.
 
Regardless of size, Greg D was always a good not great recruit. He’s certainly no slam dunk to have a meaningful impact in college. His last name has skewed expectations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: js8793
Hate to say it, but tOSU's #5 seed Romero beat the #4, 1, and 2 seeds to win at 184. More likely OW, if they award that at all.
He also didn't give up an offensive point all tournament. On the flip side 184 was one of the weaker if not weakest weights at CKLV with no top 10 guys.
 
Glory looks to be pulling a lot of weight. He will be susceptible to losses early in the day and a 150lb. handful by late afternoon on Saturday at NCAA'S if he gets that far. The quarterfinal match Friday could be trouble for him.
 
Glory looks to be pulling a lot of weight. He will be susceptible to losses early in the day and a 150lb. handful by late afternoon on Saturday at NCAA'S if he gets that far. The quarterfinal match Friday could be trouble for him.
I'd say there are about 6 guys who could possibly knock him off in a match near weigh-ins but only about 3 long after.
 
Generally, top 10. After that, predicted college success declines significantly enough to mean something.
Based on what information? I am not saying your wrong, however, I’d be curious to see your facts to support your statements.
 
Glory looks to be pulling a lot of weight. He will be susceptible to losses early in the day and a 150lb. handful by late afternoon on Saturday at NCAA'S if he gets that far. The quarterfinal match Friday could be trouble for him.
Glory looks big. And he manhandled Schroeder. I can't wait to watch Spencer and compare.
 
Based on what information? I am not saying your wrong, however, I’d be curious to see your facts to support your statements.
There have been a few different posts over time on here comparing AA's to their rankings coming into College. It leans heavily to a Top Ten ranking getting you on the podium IIRC. Unless someone who posted it directs you to the thread(s), you're on your own finding it, but they do exist. Sorry, best I can do without searching, which I'm not going to do.
 
There have been a few different posts over time on here comparing AA's to their rankings coming into College. It leans heavily to a Top Ten ranking getting you on the podium IIRC. Unless someone who posted it directs you to the thread(s), you're on your own finding it, but they do exist. Sorry, best I can do without searching, which I'm not going to do.
I believe Willie has posted a few things. Also Flo has released a a couple writeups about it, but this is also coming from the same guys that claim that 5 top 100 recruits are better than 2 top inside the top 10.

Morans.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 24 so far
I believe Willie has posted a few things. Also Flo has released a a couple writeups about it, but this is also coming from the same guys that claim that 5 top 100 recruits are better than 2 top inside the top 10.

Morans.
Well if they can do "after the fact" math then it should be OK. I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt there I guess. Just depends on how many years you want to go out and all that fun stuff.
 
I believe Willie has posted a few things. Also Flo has released a a couple writeups about it, but this is also coming from the same guys that claim that 5 top 100 recruits are better than 2 top inside the top 10.

Morans.
Lol I think he was trying to downplay the unusual situation of PSU having more top ten commits than most teams get in a decade.

No sense bragging up a situation that could best be left on the fringes…
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT