Sure if we don't have enough places to hold people and get prompt hearing. We have these things call bail laws, and we're against cruel and unusual punishment so unless you want to fund a hell a lot more judges staff lawyers and holding spaces look like we don't have a ton of other options.
Then they get arrested like any other human?
Which Marshall is that? Couldn't be Mars's law could it? "martial"
And then released? We've reached the end of my questions tbh. Is this an acceptable end game to you?
I’m for making it legal to deport asylum seekers who are arrested. No trial
I want to charge the law for non citizens. To protect citizens. We can make amendments
Biden didn’t give two shits about the border until it rose to the number one issue with voters. He let this shit happen for three years. And Schumer hasn’t brought H-R-2 up for a vote yet.
The dem pivot from "there is no problem" to "there is a problem but as usual we take zero responsibility" is hilarious to watch in real time
The above scenario was partially accounted for prior to January 2021 as those seeking entry were held in Mexico until our system was ready to process them. Biden could fix it with a pen, just like he created it with a pen, making the above scenario much less common.
"Catch and release" is an offensive, dehumanizing phrase. Decent people should stop using it.
Decent people would stop flooding this country with illegal migrants while staying the border was secure. Decent people wouldn’t have waited until an election year with polling showing it is a top issue with voters before even acknowledging there is an issue.
What does that have to do with whether or not "catch and release" is an offensive, dehumanizing phrase that decent people should stop using?
Are you saying that it's OK to use offensive and dehumanizing language if it's "descriptive"?
I honestly don't give a flying fvck if you find the term offensive. They should be thrown back over the river and left there. I'm concerned about the threat 12 million unvetted illegal aliens pose. You're concerned about offending people with words. We are in very different places on this topic.
With those fleeing populations from Democrat cities/states it shouldn't be that surprising tbh
There were more speeding tickets handed out in 2023 than there was in 1927. Policing is so much better these days!
I'm not concerned with offending people with words. I'm concerned with using words and viewpoints that are associated with bigoted, vicious ideologies. You are obviously quite happy aligning yourself with those who dehumanize others.
Jesus christ you're talking in circles. You are very clearly part of the problem tbh
You are a giant pussy.
I find it fascinating that your and Scruddy's response to my request to not use dehumanizing language is to lash out.
My response is that I'm concerned about 12 million illegals in our country thanks to this failure of an administration. I do not care if the language I use is offensive to the people in this country illegally. If this bothers you I quite frankly don't care. Seemingly you feel the same about 12 million illegal aliens entering this country over the last 3 years because you're making a bigger stink out of words then them being here.
That's not calling a spade a spade. That refusing to recognize (or should I say "admit") that you want to use dehumanizing language.
"Dehumanizing language" aside how do you excuse 12 million illegals and what is your proposal for dealing with them going forward?
