Still waiting on those comparable SEC numbers.......
Doesn't hate Iowa, doesn't like KF because he won't let him interview him. Good smart play by KF
I did the full spread for you so there was a more accurate portrayal of facts..........you're welcome.Stop at 2007 where? 2002-2017
Has he said that though. I know that was the case with Jim Rome. Has Cowherd actually said that KF won't let him interview him?Doesn't hate Iowa, doesn't like KF because he won't let him interview him. Good smart play by KF
Much like Herd you are a troll.Not counting that awful program in Ames that we can't shake from our schedule
Since 2002 and through 2017, only 10 of 44 non-conference games have been vs. Power 5 league schools
Pitt 4
Syracuse 2
Arizona State 2
Arizona 2
Herd's point is that we don't go out and play anyone in non-conference. Other Big 10 teams play the SEC in non-conference. Iowa chooses not to for what reason?
He keeps saying Iowa plays the Lamars of the world.He never addressed what Ferentz said in response to knowing the conference schedule 5 years in advance. I love how he goes through Notre Dame scheduling all those powerhouses. Playing 6-3 USC at home when they were in total coaching disarray, 3-7 Georgia Tech, and 4-5 Texas. Who...oh by the way, just got blown out and goose egged by one of those awful non conference teams that we played. Now after he says that, it should be clearly obvious that he spends very little time following college football. He might have watched Alabama play last week and I'll bet that's it, other than looking at the rankings on Wednesday morning. Anyone that actually follows the sport on a weekly basis will know that rant was so factually incorrect on almost everything. And oh yea, tell me about Baylor and Oklahoma States non conference.
I just skimmed, so I could be off by 1 or 2, but of the 14 members of the SEC, I counted a total of 12 games against teams from other power 5 conferences.
http://espn.go.com/college-football/conferences/schedule/_/id/8/sec-conference
Yep, that's about 1 per team. Iowa played two power 5 teams and won both. You'd be hard pressed to find a better OOC win than Pitt in the entire SEC or even a tougher OOC opponent. I think Wiscy/Alabama is the only one.
It's ridiculous to mention ND in any OOC conversation because every game is OOC for them. Plus NBC owns them and probably influences their schedule.
What about Baylor, TCU, and Okie State's OOC schedules? Okie State played Central Michigan, Central Ark. and UTSA. Baylor played SMU, Lamar and Rice. TCU played Minny, SMU and Stephen Austin (and barely beat Minny).
Also scheduling ranked schools is a 2 way street. They also have to want to play you. I know Missouri backed out and Iowa had to reschedule lesser opponents. Maybe a better question would be to ask Barta what's the process of scheduling non- conference opponents.Finally decided to listen to it, and all I can say is "Wow!" There were so many things wrong with what he said I don't know where to begin. "Never once has KF gotten on a phone and asked to schedule a top 10 team." - What a bold, baseless statement. "I don't make things up..." B.S. - that's pretty much all you do. I think C.J. ought to go to his studio and do a little Jim Everett on Jim Rome action. What a hateful person; I feel sorry for him.
You are right, I took the liberty of creating a new thread with the comparison of big 10 vs big 12 and SEC. They simply are not scheduling teams from power 5 confs. while the big 10 is.
Plus big 10 like PAC 12 and big 12 going to 9 conf games next year. So those 3 conferences will play 9 league plus PAC 12 and big 10 have a title game. Mean while last year SEC voted down the idea of 9 conf games (nick Saban being one of few wanting 9 games). Plus ACC sticking with 8. Yet ACC and SEC will continue to schedule poorly and ride the coat tails of the top team or 2 having a marque non conference game which is usually neutral field closer to them in the south.
Evil Monkey
1999 - 2/3 #5 Nebraska, Northern Illinois, Iowa State
2000 - 3/4 #9 KState, Western Michigan, #1 Nebraska, Iowa State
2001 -1/3 Kent State, Miami (OH), Iowa State
2002 - 1/3 Akron, Miami (OH), Utah State, Iowa State
2003 - 2/4 Miami (OH), Buffalo, #16 Arizona State, Iowa State
2004 - 2/3 Kent St, Arizona State, Iowa State
2005 - 1/3 Ball State, UNI, Iowa State
2006 - 2/4 Montana, Syracuse, NIU, Iowa State
2007 - 2/4 NIU, Syracuse, Western Michigan, Iowa State
2008 -2/4 Maine, FIU, Pitt, Iowa State
2009 -2/4 UNI, Arizona, Arkansas State, Iowa State
2010 -2/4 Eastern IL, Arizona, Ball State, Iowa State
2011 - 2/4 TN Tech, Ptt, LA-Monroe, Iowa State
2012 - 1/4 NIU, UNI, Central Michigan, Iowa State
2013 - 1/4 NIU, MO St, Western Michigan, Iowa State
2014 -2/4 UNI, Ball State, Pitt, Iowa State
2015 - 2/4 Illinois State, Pitt, North Texas, Iowa State
2016 - 1/3 Miami OH, NDSU, Iowa State
2017 - 1/3 Wyoming, North Texas, Iowa State
32/69 is the correct count on P5/Total Non-Con. You just can't add the ISU games on and not add them to the total LOL. just sayin.
Oh, and Cowherd...Iowa being successful does nothing for his show to drive ratings. How many radios in Iowa? How many TV's?
Pimping Iowa does NOTHING for his show. He readily admits, he wants the most compelling story. And for the most part, any small state midwestern school that plays old school football that today's cell-phone addicted tse-tse fly attention span younger generation falls asleep to isn't going to provide that.
He really thinks that Iowa plays Lamar from
Revenge of the Nerds
Only 12 of 46 of the non-conference were against a Power 5 league.
.
I agree, but you have to understand that winning is what is bringing on the haters....people do not like to see others succeed....successful programs and organizations will embrace the hate....there are a ton of Yankee haters out there, not to many Padre hatersThere is one way to shut up the haters- WIN. Win the next three, win the game in Indy and go prove to the country we belong.
If we keep winning, we will have a chance to show the country and the pundits if we are a legit team. Bring on Clemson/ND/Bama/Stanford/Baylor
I don't think he's a troll, I think he believes that crap he is saying which makes him a moron.
And in 2009 there was all this rant by such asI agree, but you have to understand that winning is what is bringing on the haters....people do not like to see others succeed....successful programs and organizations will embrace the hate....there are a ton of Yankee haters out there, not to many Padre haters
And in 2009 there was all this talk about Iowa winning close games, like against UNI, so that made them "unworthy"I wonder how some SEC teams would stack up over that same amount of time?
Personally, I hate how non conference schedules get stacked with cupcakes..I can see scheduling the opener as one to get the season going though.
I don't know why the talking heads think this is just an Iowa problem
Also scheduling ranked schools is a 2 way street. They also have to want to play you. I know Missouri backed out and Iowa had to reschedule lesser opponents. Maybe a better question would be to ask Barta what's the process of scheduling non- conference opponents.
Most of you don't look at things logically. You are hanging your hats on playing ISU and Pitt. If you look at Iowas schedule, the best team is NW. N friggin W. None of those teams mean anything to most fans. I totally get why they feel like they do. Especially seeing as how Iowa doesn't play any of the top schools in conference. If you don't see that, IDK what to tell ya.
I don't know why the talking heads think this is just an Iowa problem
Most of you don't look at things logically. You are hanging your hats on playing ISU and Pitt. If you look at Iowas schedule, the best team is NW. N friggin W. None of those teams mean anything to most fans. I totally get why they feel like they do. Especially seeing as how Iowa doesn't play any of the top schools in conference. If you don't see that, IDK what to tell ya.