Covid Vaccines Linked to Increases in Heart, Blood and Brain Disorders
- Thread starter Scruddy
- Start date
The US public health system the past 70 years can be summed up thusly:
1) fear mongering
2) profiteering
You forgot the most important point…..Opposition by ignorant sumsabitches like you. Bringing forth your mistimed, fake evidence argument against disease, and their prevention.
The minute "the science" was funded by the companies that wanted to achieve their own results it was tainted. When Marlboro is funding the science on smoking, there's a reason it said it was safe and effective
Case in point.
36,000 ‘cases’ of HIV and Syphilis. In one US city. In one week.
Big Pharma appreciates the business; wonder if they delivered the PCR tests personally?
17,000 People Tested Positive for HIV in the City of Houston Last Week According to Reports
Protect yourself: Seventeen thousand people purportedly tested positive for HIV last week and nineteen thousand tested positive for Syphilis. The Syphilis outbreak started in 2023 and has yet to been handled by Houston or Harris Health. The only solution which has come from the outbreak is more...
www.merissahansen.com
Those are cumulative numbers.Case in point.
36,000 ‘cases’ of HIV and Syphilis. In one US city. In one week.
Big Pharma appreciates the business; wonder if they delivered the PCR tests personally?
17,000 People Tested Positive for HIV in the City of Houston Last Week According to Reports
Protect yourself: Seventeen thousand people purportedly tested positive for HIV last week and nineteen thousand tested positive for Syphilis. The Syphilis outbreak started in 2023 and has yet to been handled by Houston or Harris Health. The only solution which has come from the outbreak is more...
Since 1999.
Jeebus, Cletus.
Case in point.
36,000 ‘cases’ of HIV and Syphilis. In one US city. In one week.
Big Pharma appreciates the business; wonder if they delivered the PCR tests personally?
17,000 People Tested Positive for HIV in the City of Houston Last Week According to Reports
Protect yourself: Seventeen thousand people purportedly tested positive for HIV last week and nineteen thousand tested positive for Syphilis. The Syphilis outbreak started in 2023 and has yet to been handled by Houston or Harris Health. The only solution which has come from the outbreak is more...
U got suckered, again, Cletus
Social media posts falsely claim thousands in Houston were diagnosed with STDs, health department says
The health department said a “violation of its policies” resulted in an image being shared that falsely claims thousands of Houstonians were diagnosed with STDs.
www.khou.com
According to the officials, the data does not represent diagnoses -- it represents the number of tests done for certain STDs across the entire state of Texas last week. There’s no indication if the tests were positive or negative.
The Houston Health Department said a “violation of its policies” resulted in the screenshot of an internal “data system” being shared. The department said additional security measures were implemented to prevent future incidents, however, it would not confirm if an employee has been identified as the one who published the data.
Joe doesn’t understand pharmaceutical-funded studies designed to validate their products via fudged data.
You'll notice he ignored the fauci aids post for a reason
Conclusions
The consistency seen among cases in this review with known COVID-19 vaccine mechanisms of injury and death, coupled with autopsy confirmation by physician adjudication, suggests there is a high likelihood of a causal link between COVID-19 vaccines and death. Further urgent investigation is required for the purpose of clarifying our findings.Author
Dr Peter Andrew McCullough He was vice chief of internal medicine at Baylor University Medical Center and a professor at Texas A&M University.
Author
Dr Harvey A. Risch
Professor Emeritus, Yale University School of Public Health, New Haven, CT
Author
Dr Nicolas Hulscher
University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
They seem like quacks 😉
Dr Peter Andrew McCullough He was vice chief of internal medicine at Baylor University Medical Center and a professor at Texas A&M University.
Author
Dr Harvey A. Risch
Professor Emeritus, Yale University School of Public Health, New Haven, CT
Author
Dr Nicolas Hulscher
University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
They seem like quacks 😉
Authors look like quacks.
Not really a single major institution represented there.
And you missed this big caveat:
Further urgent investigation is required for the purpose of clarifying our findings.
Several do.
And they have very weak conclusions.
A few hundred "possibly" linked deaths, out of several hundred million vaccine doses.
That's barely registering in the noise floor. Which you'll see other investigators pointing out when referencing this.
Mean age 70+
Modest links to vaccination.
Can you cite whether any had been exposed to Covid, and what lists of co-morbidities they had?
240 deaths among 200M+ vaccinations seems like there's zero actual correlation here. The reality is, you examine the same population of non-vaccinated people in a different year, you'd find 240 deaths, easily.
Someone doesn’t understand percentages:
- We found that 73.9% of deaths were directly due to or significantly contributed to by COVID-19 vaccination (suggesting) a high likelihood of a causal link between COVID-19 vaccination and death.
"We can infer that in such cases, death may have been caused by COVID-19 vaccination."
That's a terribly weak statement & association.
If folks had reactions to the spike protein in the vaccines, Covid would have killed them off much much faster.
If this group would have compared these same findings against the same age groups, unvaccinated, and exposed to Covid, we'd almost certainly see the vaccines saved a lot more lives than could be remotely linked to vaccine reactions. That's the data they should be comparing - why won't they make that comparison?
That's a terribly weak statement & association.
If folks had reactions to the spike protein in the vaccines, Covid would have killed them off much much faster.
If this group would have compared these same findings against the same age groups, unvaccinated, and exposed to Covid, we'd almost certainly see the vaccines saved a lot more lives than could be remotely linked to vaccine reactions. That's the data they should be comparing - why won't they make that comparison?
Again: compare these results against the same patient population that gets Covid w/o any prior vaccination.
That is the correct association and comparison here. They will not do this, because their data would show a 100x to 1000x benefit from the vaccines.
Out of hundreds of millions of vaccine doses, they found 240 they can possibly "link" to vaccines.
This caveat here is the giveaway:
Finally, confounding variables, particularly concomitant illnesses, infection, drug interactions, and other factors not accounted for, could have played roles in the causal pathway to death.
That 1000 or more people (out of well over a billion - 640M in the US, alone) could have been infected with actual Covid around the time they got a vaccine (which would be too late for the vaccine to provide much protection) is a statistical and practical certainty. These guys have a major bias in their search methods, and they did no concomitant investigation to account for any of it.
Are there still people who doubt the above? Even left wing media has admitted as much, particularly after the Hunter Biden laptop was admitted as evidence in his recent trial.
Exactly…and for younger, healthy people who have good diet and exercise regimes, the boosters are likely not as necesssary as for those with other underlying health risk(s).
He doesn't understand much period lol
What happened to "do no harm" is that not part of the hippocratic oath anymore? If we could save JUST 1 life....
Sure I do.
240 attributed deaths
>1 billion vaccine doses.
That's 0.000024%
Which is well below any "noise floor" for any detectable correlation. Already cited that for you, along with the caveats included in the article by the authors, themselves. If even 1% of those 1B doses were in people who had active Covid infections, that'd be 10M people who would have had a co-morbidity they are unable to account for in their "survey". Finding 240 deaths out of 10M possibly exposed people is a statistical certainty.
Then you probably need to cancel 100% of medical procedures and surgeries, because there's always a small % chance someone will die due to a surgery/procedure.
Or the science community could have done nothing (“do no harm”) and lost another 100k to 1M citizens to Covid…
The scientific community did nothing but make stuff up like 6 feet and walking down the aisle of the grocery store 1 way.
According to the Atlantic article posted here this week, Fauci went from being clueless about covid on January 1st, 2020 when a reporter called and asked him about it - to declaring two days later that ‘we’re going to need a vaccine for whatever this virus turns out to be’.
According to the puff piece, his first “Oh, shit!” moment didn’t even occur until 3 weeks later.
This was a planned psyop with a pre-ordained ‘solution’. And the incoming bird flu will be more of the same though it will probably be considerably amped up.
No shit.
Just like SARs and MERs (and there was a vaccine in the works for MERs - an mRNA vaccine - but that epidemic fizzled out before the vaccine was ready to be released).
The weather man didn't say it was raining, he said there was precipitation falling at a moderate rate from the clouds.
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
Caden Wilkins on his (and Davis Kern's) Gameday Visit Last Weekend- Latest: Eliot Clough
-
-
-
