COVID vaccines to be banned for all age groups in the US?

[Joes Place]

Bones rotting inside her body. Sounds safe and effective. 🫣

Like thousands of Americans who suffered injuries shortly after getting their Covid vaccine, Mrs Burnette attributes her ailments to the shot. But a lack of research and evidence has left vaccine victims without answers, lacking support and being cast as anti-vaxxers.

However, last week, a small Yale University study offered some support to victims' stories as experts discovered a previously-unknown condition - dubbed 'post-vaccination syndrome.'

Doctors attribute mom-of-two's chronic bone death to Covid vaccine

Brittany Burnette, of Tennessee, used to take care of others as director of a nursing home until she developed a condition that caused her bones to die after receiving the Covid vaccine.

www.dailymail.co.uk

The PVS info has been posted multiple times, already.
Articles upwards of a year or more old.

Incidence rates are 0.02%, Cletus.

 

[Joes Place]

Bones rotting inside her body. Sounds safe and effective. 🫣

Like thousands of Americans who suffered injuries shortly after getting their Covid vaccine, Mrs Burnette attributes her ailments to the shot. But a lack of research and evidence has left vaccine victims without answers, lacking support and being cast as anti-vaxxers.

However, last week, a small Yale University study offered some support to victims' stories as experts discovered a previously-unknown condition - dubbed 'post-vaccination syndrome.'

Doctors attribute mom-of-two's chronic bone death to Covid vaccine

Brittany Burnette, of Tennessee, used to take care of others as director of a nursing home until she developed a condition that caused her bones to die after receiving the Covid vaccine.

www.dailymail.co.uk

"doctors attributed her complications to her bout of Covid in late November 2020"

 

[MichaelKeller99]

"doctors attributed her complications to her bout of Covid in late November 2020 AND SUBSEQUENT VACCINES"

Also known as immune enhancement, which is what Fauci warned us about re: toxic mRNA injections.

 

[Joes Place]

Also known as immune enhancement

Nope.

Covid has been shown to wreak havoc on the immune system.

YOUR POST showed she got Covid months before vaccines came out; highly likely her condition resulted from that infection.

 

[KFsdisciple]

Bones rotting inside her body. Sounds safe and effective. 🫣

Like thousands of Americans who suffered injuries shortly after getting their Covid vaccine, Mrs Burnette attributes her ailments to the shot. But a lack of research and evidence has left vaccine victims without answers, lacking support and being cast as anti-vaxxers.

However, last week, a small Yale University study offered some support to victims' stories as experts discovered a previously-unknown condition - dubbed 'post-vaccination syndrome.'

Doctors attribute mom-of-two's chronic bone death to Covid vaccine

Brittany Burnette, of Tennessee, used to take care of others as director of a nursing home until she developed a condition that caused her bones to die after receiving the Covid vaccine.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Not according to Joe's Place, there's nothing new in that Yale study, it's all old news. Which isn't the own he thought it was... considering he's been saying how amazing and safe and effective these shots are for the last few years...

 

[Joes Place]

Not according to Joe's Place

She had Covid before she got a vaccine.

Post-Covid sequelae rates are orders of magnitude higher than anything reported about the vaccines.

 

[hexumhawk]

Finally
What vaccine would you recommend that has worse side affects and safety than amount it would help you?

 

[Joes Place]

What vaccine would you recommend that has worse side affects and safety than amount it would help you?

Mods: This bot needs additional English/grammar lessons.

 

[hexumhawk]

Mods: This bot needs additional English/grammar lessons.

Sorry- I was vaccine injured

 

[Joes Place]

Sorry- Covid brain fog

Figured

 

[KFsdisciple]

Nope.

Covid has been shown to wreak havoc on the immune system.

YOUR POST showed she got Covid months before vaccines came out; highly likely her condition resulted from that infection.

Lab created bio-weapons, and their cures have a tendency to wreak havoc on a lot of systems.

 

[Joes Place]

Lab created bio-weapons, and their cures have a tendency to wreak havoc on a lot of systems.

Whether Covid occurred naturally (what the data says) or not, is irrelevant.

Vaccine-induced injury rates are 0.02%
Covid induced injury rates in children are 1-3%, with vaccines providing 50-75% effectiveness at preventing them.
Covid induced injury rates in adults are 10-30%, with vaccines being 50% or more effective in preventing them.

 

[KFsdisciple]

She had Covid before she got a vaccine.

Post-Covid sequelae rates are orders of magnitude higher than anything reported about the vaccines.

Reported is the keyword here. I guess if it's not reported it doesn't count... and if it's in VAERS it doesn't count...

 

[Joes Place]

Reported is the keyword here.

So, you'll only "selectively" accept the facts that feed your conspiracy.

0.02% rate vs 10-30%
Not a close call on what the science says.

 

[MichaelKeller99]

Nope.

Covid has been shown to wreak havoc on the immune system.

YOUR POST showed she got Covid months before vaccines came out; highly likely her condition resulted from that infection.

That's the thing about immune enhancement. Doesn't matter if it's injection first then infection or infection first then injection.

Bones don't rot without the mRNA poisoning her body. ☠️💉

 

[Joes Place]

That's the thing about immune enhancement.

It's totally fabricated in your brain.

0.02% vs 30%

Math is hard for you folks!!!

 

[KFsdisciple]

So, you'll only "selectively" accept the facts that feed your conspiracy.

0.02% rate vs 10-30%
Not a close call on what the science says.

If the events go unreported or under reported, then like you and your Cletus responses, your figures mean nothing.

But I don't have to tell a smart guy like you that. As long as deaths aren't being reported, then people aren't dying. If aunt Suzie's obit isn't in the Thursday paper, I guess Aunt Suzie never died.

 

[Joes Place]

If the events go unreported or under reported

They don't

People like the link you've referred to go and get care for their alleged "side effects", as well as those who have sequelae from Covid.

The "unreported" and "under-reported" incidents are the minor ones that go away in a week.

 

[KFsdisciple]

They don't

People like the link you've referred to go and get care for their alleged "side effects", as well as those who have sequelae from Covid.

The "unreported" and "under-reported" incidents are the minor ones that go away in a week.

Or the ones never entered into VAERs. Which I guess doesn't matter because you don't care what's in there anyway.

 

[Joes Place]

Or the ones never entered into VAERs.

If they had a serious enough issue, it got reported.

That's what PCPs do.

 

[KFsdisciple]

If they had a serious enough issue, it got reported.

That's what PCPs do.

Ahhh yes, but YOU sir have denounced VAERs in the past and continue to disregard that data. Then accuse others of cherry picking the data that supports their arguments. It's projection 101.

 

[Joes Place]

Ahhh yes, but YOU sir have denounced VAERs in the past

I have denounced RAW VAERS input. Because there's LOTS of bullshit that gets added to it

The exact OPPOSITE of "under-reporting", that is your claim here.

 

[KFsdisciple]

I have denounced RAW VAERS input. Because there's LOTS of bullshit that gets added to it

The exact OPPOSITE of "under-reporting", that is your claim here.

under reporting in VAERS

Rapid response to:

Ramifications of adverse events in children in Australia​

BMJ 2010; 340 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c2994 (Published 09 June 2010)Cite this as: BMJ 2010;340:c2994

Rapid Response:​

Underreporting Vaccine Adverse Events​

​

Peter Collignon and his colleagues do not exaggerate the problem of
adverse event underreporting. VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System) is
the voluntary system used in the U.S. to signal vaccine side effects.
During the 18-year period from 1990 through 2007 just 88 cases of Kawasaki
Disease in children under 5 were reported to VAERS. During the same
period about 88 million U.S. children passed through the 0-5 age group;
consequently the incidence rate reported to VAERS was 0.10 KD cases per
100,000 person-years. (Pediatr Infect Dis J 28:943, 2009) From 1988 to
2006 the published KD incidence for U.S. children under 5 rose from 11.0
to 20.8 per 100,000 person-years. (Pediatrics 111:448, 2003. Pediatrics
112:495, 2003. Pediatr Infect Dis J 29:483, 2010) Even for infants 3-6
months old, when suspicion for vaccine adverse effects should be
especially high, KD incidence as reported to VAERS was 0.11 while published
background rates were 23.1 (2000) and 24.6 (2006); fewer than 1 in 200 KD
cases were reported to VAERS.

It is bewildering, therefore, to learn that FDA and CDC officials used VAERS data to dismiss a placebo-controlled
trial that found a 5-fold KD risk associated with RotaTeq--RR=4.9; 95% CI
0.6, 239. (Pediatr Infect Dis J 28:943, 2009. 6/15/07.
) If confirmed by a larger trial, the KD risk
associated with RotaTeq would translate to an extra 4000 U.S. cases
annually in young children. I know that this discussion began with
febrile convulsions in young children given seasonal flu vaccine, but the problems
with voluntary reporting systems, underreporting of adverse events and the
way the data are used by public health officials and the vaccine industry
apply to other vaccines and other serious clinical problems. How can public
health officials rely on a system that reports fewer than 1% of adverse effects?
How can they dismiss placebo-controlled trials that raise serious
possibilities of vaccine-caused illness?

Competing interests:
None declared
Competing interests: No competing interests

 

[Joes Place]

under reporting in VAERS

Rapid response to:

Ramifications of adverse events in children in Australia​

BMJ 2010; 340 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c2994 (Published 09 June 2010)Cite this as: BMJ 2010;340:c2994

Rapid Response:​

Underreporting Vaccine Adverse Events​

​

Peter Collignon and his colleagues do not exaggerate the problem of
adverse event underreporting. VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System) is
the voluntary system used in the U.S. to signal vaccine side effects.
During the 18-year period from 1990 through 2007 just 88 cases of Kawasaki
Disease in children under 5 were reported to VAERS. During the same
period about 88 million U.S. children passed through the 0-5 age group;
consequently the incidence rate reported to VAERS was 0.10 KD cases per
100,000 person-years. (Pediatr Infect Dis J 28:943, 2009) From 1988 to
2006 the published KD incidence for U.S. children under 5 rose from 11.0
to 20.8 per 100,000 person-years. (Pediatrics 111:448, 2003. Pediatrics
112:495, 2003. Pediatr Infect Dis J 29:483, 2010) Even for infants 3-6
months old, when suspicion for vaccine adverse effects should be
especially high, KD incidence as reported to VAERS was 0.11 while published
background rates were 23.1 (2000) and 24.6 (2006); fewer than 1 in 200 KD
cases were reported to VAERS.

It is bewildering, therefore, to learn that FDA and CDC officials used VAERS data to dismiss a placebo-controlled
trial that found a 5-fold KD risk associated with RotaTeq--RR=4.9; 95% CI
0.6, 239. (Pediatr Infect Dis J 28:943, 2009. 6/15/07.
) If confirmed by a larger trial, the KD risk
associated with RotaTeq would translate to an extra 4000 U.S. cases
annually in young children. I know that this discussion began with
febrile convulsions in young children given seasonal flu vaccine, but the problems
with voluntary reporting systems, underreporting of adverse events and the
way the data are used by public health officials and the vaccine industry
apply to other vaccines and other serious clinical problems. How can public
health officials rely on a system that reports fewer than 1% of adverse effects?
How can they dismiss placebo-controlled trials that raise serious
possibilities of vaccine-caused illness?

Competing interests:
None declared
Competing interests: No competing interests

You had to dig back 15 yrs to find one article.
Cool.

Not a SINGLE real university institution linked on that one. Looks like one rogue anti-vaxxer pushing it.

 

[MichaelKeller99]

under reporting in VAERS

Rapid response to:

Ramifications of adverse events in children in Australia​

BMJ 2010; 340 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c2994 (Published 09 June 2010)Cite this as: BMJ 2010;340:c2994

Rapid Response:​

Underreporting Vaccine Adverse Events​

​

Peter Collignon and his colleagues do not exaggerate the problem of
adverse event underreporting. VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System) is
the voluntary system used in the U.S. to signal vaccine side effects.
During the 18-year period from 1990 through 2007 just 88 cases of Kawasaki
Disease in children under 5 were reported to VAERS. During the same
period about 88 million U.S. children passed through the 0-5 age group;
consequently the incidence rate reported to VAERS was 0.10 KD cases per
100,000 person-years. (Pediatr Infect Dis J 28:943, 2009) From 1988 to
2006 the published KD incidence for U.S. children under 5 rose from 11.0
to 20.8 per 100,000 person-years. (Pediatrics 111:448, 2003. Pediatrics
112:495, 2003. Pediatr Infect Dis J 29:483, 2010) Even for infants 3-6
months old, when suspicion for vaccine adverse effects should be
especially high, KD incidence as reported to VAERS was 0.11 while published
background rates were 23.1 (2000) and 24.6 (2006); fewer than 1 in 200 KD
cases were reported to VAERS.

It is bewildering, therefore, to learn that FDA and CDC officials used VAERS data to dismiss a placebo-controlled
trial that found a 5-fold KD risk associated with RotaTeq--RR=4.9; 95% CI
0.6, 239. (Pediatr Infect Dis J 28:943, 2009. 6/15/07.
) If confirmed by a larger trial, the KD risk
associated with RotaTeq would translate to an extra 4000 U.S. cases
annually in young children. I know that this discussion began with
febrile convulsions in young children given seasonal flu vaccine, but the problems
with voluntary reporting systems, underreporting of adverse events and the
way the data are used by public health officials and the vaccine industry
apply to other vaccines and other serious clinical problems. How can public
health officials rely on a system that reports fewer than 1% of adverse effects?
How can they dismiss placebo-controlled trials that raise serious
possibilities of vaccine-caused illness?

Competing interests:
None declared
Competing interests: No competing interests

Nothing to see there. It's just RotaTeq. And the inventor of RotaTeq, Paul Offit. Who sat on the ACIP board. 👀

 

[Joes Place]

Nothing to see there. It's just RotaTeq.

And what publication since 2010 do you have on the safety here?
Aside from one publication put forth by a small cadre of antivaxxers?

If that vaccine is "unsafe", I'd expect to see dozens of publications from numerous university sources about it.
Show us the cards, bro.