ADVERTISEMENT

Debunking Biden’s deficit claims, one by one

binsfeldcyhawk2

HR Legend
Gold Member
Oct 13, 2006
37,359
52,613
113
The tale President Joe Biden tells is that his “Bidenomics” had a positive impact on the economy by reducing the budget deficit and getting inflation under control.

The problem is that it’s just not true.
On the one hand, we have the claims made by the White House and the Treasury, but on the other hand, we have the cold hard facts.

Unfortunately for the White House, the final budget data for fiscal year 2023 tells the story of out-of-control spending, even outpacing rising revenues, and the devastating effects that can have on an economy through inflation.

Federal spending last year was nearly $1 trillion higher than projections made before the Biden presidency. Remember that the next time you hear President Biden claim that he has reduced the deficit.
As we examine any president’s impact on economic policy, a key tool is the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) forecast. It shows what was projected under the laws that existed immediately before Biden’s inauguration in January 2021. When we compare that to the actual fiscal situation, we can assess the impact a president has had.


The results are not good for Biden — or the taxpayers.

The deficit for fiscal year 2023 exceeded the CBO’s pre-Biden baseline projections by a staggering 76 percent.
The administration blamed “falling revenues” in a statement from Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen and Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Director Shalanda Young. After hitting record levels in 2022, tax collections dipped in 2023 because of reduced capital gains realizations and higher tax credit claims.

But compared to the pre-Biden CBO projections, actual revenues were $237 billion higher than anticipated. Revenues that outperformed expectations by 6 percent did not grow the deficit.

The entire increase in the deficit relative to the pre-Biden projection for fiscal year 2023 is due to spending being $970 billion, or 19 percent, higher than predicted.

Leading the way in driving spending higher were $659 billion in interest payments, which exceeded the original forecast by an astonishing 137 percent.

Interest costs surpassed expectations significantly due to both interest rates and the amount of debt being financed surging past what was anticipated back in 2021.

The CBO initially estimated that the interest rate on 10-year Treasury Notes at this point would be a mere 1.58 percent. However, rates now exceed 4 percent.
Food stamp spending in 2023 exceeded the initial projections by 73 percent, with the average monthly benefit surpassing estimates by 61 percent. In 2021, the Biden Department of Agriculture altered the calculation used to determine food stamp benefit payments. The CBO estimated that the increase in welfare benefits will cost taxpayers up to $300 billion over 10 years.

Biden’s American Rescue Plan Act contributed to the surge of spending, including expanded ObamaCare subsidies for the wealthy and tens of billions in bailouts for poorly run union pensions.

Other laws increased spending on green infrastructure, veterans’ benefits, subsidies for chip manufacturing, and aid to Ukraine, all without even considering offsetting spending reductions elsewhere in the budget.

Of course, these spending increases are just as attributable to Congress as the president, but the primary drivers were high priorities and signature legislation of the Biden administration — and the higher inflation and interest costs they caused.

The national debt is now $2.5 trillion higher than the CBO projected it would be before Biden’s spending binge.

The nation’s fiscal trajectory is unsustainable, and Bidenomics has made things worse by growing spending and driving the deficit higher than it would have been.

American families are suffering from high inflation and lower real wages, direct consequences of irresponsible government spending.

House Speaker Mike Johnson’s (R-La.) refusal to accept further spending hikes is a commonsense first step to restoring fiscal responsibility. To get the economy and the budget on track, lawmakers must remain steadfast in their efforts to reverse the curse of overspending and the national debt.

Matthew Dickerson is director of Budget Policy at the Economic Policy Innovation Center (EPIC). He was previously a senior staff member of the House Budget Committee.
 
  • For the period from October 2023 through December 2023, the budget deficit totaled just shy of $510 billion, following a shortfall of $129.4 billion in December alone.
  • The deficit has continued to pile up despite the Biden administration's assurances that the Inflation Reduction Act, in addition to reducing prices, would shave "hundreds of billions" off the deficit.

 
Trump blew out the budget deficit

2017 $670B
2018 $780B
2019 $980B
2020 $3.31T

4 year total 5.56T. Yikes

Joe said "Hold my beer".

2021 2.77T
2022 1.38T
2023 1.70T

3 year total 5.85T. Double Yikes!!!

Conclusion...we're F'd.

 
Perhaps I'm not following closely enough but based on your posting history you are very critical of Biden. How could you ever vote for him?
Unfortunately I agree with this.....

Don't like Clinton. Hate Trump.

This "campaign" won't be about issues....they'll be slinging shit at each other on a daily basis. Trump wins....America loses.

At least it'll be entertaining.

The "Greatest country on earth" has come down to a choice between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump.

The choice between "the lesser of 2 evils" has gone to a whole new level. It's pretty incredible really....this is the best we could do....

My choice is Hillary in this scenario....and it makes me vomit in my mouth a bit. Sad state of affairs...
 
  • Like
Reactions: NoleATL
The tale President Joe Biden tells is that his “Bidenomics” had a positive impact on the economy by reducing the budget deficit and getting inflation under control.

The problem is that it’s just not true.
On the one hand, we have the claims made by the White House and the Treasury, but on the other hand, we have the cold hard facts.

Unfortunately for the White House, the final budget data for fiscal year 2023 tells the story of out-of-control spending, even outpacing rising revenues, and the devastating effects that can have on an economy through inflation.

Federal spending last year was nearly $1 trillion higher than projections made before the Biden presidency. Remember that the next time you hear President Biden claim that he has reduced the deficit.
As we examine any president’s impact on economic policy, a key tool is the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) forecast. It shows what was projected under the laws that existed immediately before Biden’s inauguration in January 2021. When we compare that to the actual fiscal situation, we can assess the impact a president has had.


The results are not good for Biden — or the taxpayers.

The deficit for fiscal year 2023 exceeded the CBO’s pre-Biden baseline projections by a staggering 76 percent.
The administration blamed “falling revenues” in a statement from Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen and Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Director Shalanda Young. After hitting record levels in 2022, tax collections dipped in 2023 because of reduced capital gains realizations and higher tax credit claims.

But compared to the pre-Biden CBO projections, actual revenues were $237 billion higher than anticipated. Revenues that outperformed expectations by 6 percent did not grow the deficit.

The entire increase in the deficit relative to the pre-Biden projection for fiscal year 2023 is due to spending being $970 billion, or 19 percent, higher than predicted.

Leading the way in driving spending higher were $659 billion in interest payments, which exceeded the original forecast by an astonishing 137 percent.

Interest costs surpassed expectations significantly due to both interest rates and the amount of debt being financed surging past what was anticipated back in 2021.

The CBO initially estimated that the interest rate on 10-year Treasury Notes at this point would be a mere 1.58 percent. However, rates now exceed 4 percent.
Food stamp spending in 2023 exceeded the initial projections by 73 percent, with the average monthly benefit surpassing estimates by 61 percent. In 2021, the Biden Department of Agriculture altered the calculation used to determine food stamp benefit payments. The CBO estimated that the increase in welfare benefits will cost taxpayers up to $300 billion over 10 years.

Biden’s American Rescue Plan Act contributed to the surge of spending, including expanded ObamaCare subsidies for the wealthy and tens of billions in bailouts for poorly run union pensions.

Other laws increased spending on green infrastructure, veterans’ benefits, subsidies for chip manufacturing, and aid to Ukraine, all without even considering offsetting spending reductions elsewhere in the budget.

Of course, these spending increases are just as attributable to Congress as the president, but the primary drivers were high priorities and signature legislation of the Biden administration — and the higher inflation and interest costs they caused.

The national debt is now $2.5 trillion higher than the CBO projected it would be before Biden’s spending binge.

The nation’s fiscal trajectory is unsustainable, and Bidenomics has made things worse by growing spending and driving the deficit higher than it would have been.

American families are suffering from high inflation and lower real wages, direct consequences of irresponsible government spending.

House Speaker Mike Johnson’s (R-La.) refusal to accept further spending hikes is a commonsense first step to restoring fiscal responsibility. To get the economy and the budget on track, lawmakers must remain steadfast in their efforts to reverse the curse of overspending and the national debt.

Matthew Dickerson is director of Budget Policy at the Economic Policy Innovation Center (EPIC). He was previously a senior staff member of the House Budget Committee.
I would need to check, but I don't think the Administration counted the interest cost of any of his spending against the benefits they promise. That contributes to inflation, which is cumulative, and hurts everyone. That hurt is disproportionately worse for the poor and middle class.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hawkland14
I would need to check, but I don't think the Administration counted the interest cost of any of his spending against the benefits they promise. That contributes to inflation, which is cumulative, and hurts everyone. That hurt is disproportionately worse for the poor and middle class.
I just don't like the gas lighting on the subject by the administration. They passed Trump's 4 yr total in 3 years and he was fiscally irresponsible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Finance85
Trump blew out the budget deficit

2017 $670B
2018 $780B
2019 $980B
2020 $3.31T

4 year total 5.56T. Yikes

Joe said "Hold my beer".

2021 2.77T
2022 1.38T
2023 1.70T

3 year total 5.85T. Double Yikes!!!

Conclusion...we're F'd.

Yes because Republicans wouldn’t raise the tax rate back up on the wealthy. Biden wanted pay fors. The Republican Party said no. They want their donors to keep their massive tax cuts.
 
Yes because Republicans wouldn’t raise the tax rate back up on the wealthy. Biden wanted pay fors. The Republican Party said no. They want their donors to keep their massive tax cuts.
You do realize the Trump tax cuts sunset this year, right?

It's a spending problem, not a revenue problem. Had spending simply gone up at the rate GDP went up, we wouldn't be having this discussion.
 
You do realize the Trump tax cuts sunset this year, right?

It's a spending problem, not a revenue problem. Had spending simply gone up at the rate GDP went up, we wouldn't be having this discussion.
You do realize they don’t sunset on the rich, right? Just for the middle class…many who love him.
 
Yes because Republicans wouldn’t raise the tax rate back up on the wealthy. Biden wanted pay fors. The Republican Party said no. They want their donors to keep their massive tax cuts.
Sure he did.

Pull your head out Tom and quit being a partisan hack. Both parties are spending us into oblivion.

Keep drinking the kool aid though...
 
You do realize the Trump tax cuts sunset this year, right?

It's a spending problem, not a revenue problem. Had spending simply gone up at the rate GDP went up, we wouldn't be having this discussion.
They expire after Dec 31, 2025
 
Sure he did.

Pull your head out Tom and quit being a partisan hack. Both parties are spending us into oblivion.

Keep drinking the kool aid though...
It's really hard to have any kind of discussion with people like you who don't listen. Don't pay attention.


Republicans blocked this. This isn't difficult to see the difference between the parties but here you go with your both sides BS. Non stop. Freaking learn.
 
37% is not high enough for you?
You think they were getting screwed pre-Trump tax cuts? Don't even get started on the corporate tax rates either. They get wealthier and wealthier and the middle class has taken it on the chin since Reagan. You probably don't think the rising costs of goods is leading to record corporate profits. All inflation, right?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: abby97
You think they were getting screwed pre-Trump tax cuts? Don't even get started on the corporate tax rates either. They get wealthier and wealthier and the middle class has taken it on the chin since Reagan. You probably don't think the rising costs of goods is leading to record corporate profits. All inflation, right?
So 37 is to low what is your number?
 
You think they were getting screwed pre-Trump tax cuts? Don't even get started on the corporate tax rates either. They get wealthier and wealthier and the middle class has taken it on the chin since Reagan. You probably don't think the rising costs of goods is leading to record corporate profits. All inflation, right?
Stick to volleyballs and Presidential fitness tests, economics is not your strong suit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TornadoHawk93
You think they were getting screwed pre-Trump tax cuts? Don't even get started on the corporate tax rates either. They get wealthier and wealthier and the middle class has taken it on the chin since Reagan. You probably don't think the rising costs of goods is leading to record corporate profits. All inflation, right?
Tom what is your number?
 
Weird response.

That's a no by the way.

Sooner or later the ballooning budget deficit is gonna leave a serious mark.

The fact that you post 10x as much negative material about Biden while NEVER starting a threat critical of the leader of the GOP tells everyone where your head is. That’s why you got the response.
 
The fact that you post 10x as much negative material about Biden while NEVER starting a threat critical of the leader of the GOP tells everyone where your head is. That’s why you got the response.
There it is.

Can’t talk about ballooning deficits because it reflects poorly on Joe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EasyHawk
There it is.

Can’t talk about ballooning deficits because it reflects poorly on Joe.

No. But the “ballooning deficits” is just your talking point of the day. So regulars on here will be forgiven to take what you post in context. In one year our President is going to be either Biden or Trump. It is clear who your preference is.

And, btw, deficit spending is Economics 101 for reviving a struggling economy, and COVID was the most economically disruptive event in my lifetime. Of any of our lifetimes.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT