Maybe they deserve indictments.
If they get indicted, the school wouldn't need to take any actionI think so. It was a pretty cowardly assault.
Hopefully the school takes some harsh action themselves too.
People get more out of that short video than I. While on the surface it doesn't look good, I've learned things are rarely as they seem.
What happened previously in the game? Is there a back story leading up to the game?
I have more questions that a few second video doesn't answer. Until I know more I can't pass judgement beyond a simple "it doesn't look good".
What more could you possibly even need to see? It was intentional and there is zero disputing that. ZeroPeople get more out of that short video than I. While on the surface it doesn't look good, I've learned things are rarely as they seem.
What happened previously in the game? Is there a back story leading up to the game?
I have more questions that a few second video doesn't answer. Until I know more I can't pass judgement beyond a simple "it doesn't look good".
What more could you possibly even need to see? It was intentional and there is zero disputing that. Zero
Not disputing it's intentional, but doesn't change my view. While I don't condone what they did, or begin to advocate for them, what transpired previously in the game that lead to their actions?
I have a difficult time believing they arbitrarily decided to do what they did without real or imagined provocation.
This, nothing would justify what the kid did. Agree they should be banned for life. That is some cowardly crap and if i was that ref I would have ripped that kids helmet off and beat his ass.Huh? What could the ref had possibly done to make this ok in your mind? Made a bad call? Yeah, that worth deliberately taking him out from the blindside.
Not disputing it's intentional, but doesn't change my view. While I don't condone what they did, or begin to advocate for them, what transpired previously in the game that lead to their actions?
I have a difficult time believing they arbitrarily decided to do what they did without real or imagined provocation.
People get more out of that short video than I. While on the surface it doesn't look good, I've learned things are rarely as they seem.
What happened previously in the game? Is there a back story leading up to the game?
I have more questions that a few second video doesn't answer. Until I know more I can't pass judgement beyond a simple "it doesn't look good".
Huh? What could the ref had possibly done to make this ok in your mind? Made a bad call? Yeah, that worth deliberately taking him out from the blindside.
Mindboggling response. Please give me an example of when this would be ok. Thanks and I'll wait.
Only an idiot could post that. You don't need any further "context" the official was targeted. The player should be ejected for that game and at least the following. I know what my football coach would have done. On Monday the team would have one less player.Maybe he deserved it. Need more context.
Not disputing it's intentional, but doesn't change my view. While I don't condone what they did, or begin to advocate for them, what transpired previously in the game that lead to their actions?
I have a difficult time believing they arbitrarily decided to do what they did without real or imagined provocation.
You always need context. It looks terrible, but you need context and I hate it when people watch a snippet and say they've seen all they need to see and make their decisions based off it solely. Those people are idiots. What if the red had s gun? Unlikely, but what if he did? Would you feel different?What could possibly make that ok? I'm just curious...in what scenario would you be able to condone this? Those two OBVIOUSLY thought it was a "good course of action". So what?
Regardless of the provocation, those two players should be done for the rest of the year and should be facing charges.
I could throw all sorts of hypotheticals out there a person/referee could say or do away from the game, before the game or during the game that would lead somebody/players to take matters into their own hands and retaliate.
I'm not saying they're right or justified in what they did. People/kids can act emotionally and carelessly.
10 seconds or how ever long that clip lasted is too short of a window to indicate "there's nothing this ref could have done ......" To do so is overreacting.
If one was my kid I would be very upset and both. I would also like to be pragmatic and ask "what lead to your goonish behavior?"
Or maybe I wouldn't need to because kids all too often get the sense of justice and acceptable behavior at home.
You always need context. It looks terrible, but you need context and I hate it when people watch a snippet and say they've seen all they need to see and make their decisions based off it solely. Those people are idiots. What if the red had s gun? Unlikely, but what if he did? Would you feel different?
Highly unlikely, but it gets my point across. You need context before you jump to conclusions on a 20 second video clip. Weren't there wing nuts jumping in on both sides of the planned parenthood videos? How do we know this is even a real video?Seriously? You think those two were protecting the fans from a terrorist? You're trying waaaay too hard.
Highly unlikely, but it gets my point across. You need context before you jump to conclusions on a 20 second video clip. Weren't there wing nuts jumping in on both sides of the planned parenthood videos? How do we know this is even a real video?
Undoubtedly this will happen at some point.Anyone want to bet the players who did this say that the ref used a racial slur towards them?