You are confusing 2 different time periods.Based on the body cam footage, he didn't tell her to get out of the van and drive off. He was trying to get them both to take a walk to cool off.
You are confusing 2 different time periods.Based on the body cam footage, he didn't tell her to get out of the van and drive off. He was trying to get them both to take a walk to cool off.
I don't know if he is guilty or not, but if he knows something he should give that information, even just the route they went on and where he last saw her.You're right. It's not personal for me. But I have known 2 people, who are good friends, who were unjustly accused of crimes. Both times the charges were dropped, but only after a lot of legal expenses, anguish, and damage to their reputations.
IF we just look at this thread, there are so many people who automatically think Laundrie is guilty of murder, even without knowing if she's dead, I'm not surprised he isn't talking.
Interesting. I recognize the visitor center for Arches NP in the background.Don't know if this has been posted. Fill body cam footage of the two of them being stopped and Gabby almost being charged with domestic violence?
I don't know if he is guilty or not, but if he knows something he should give that information, even just the route they went on and where he last saw her.
The silence certainly won't help him with a jury, but if that is all the jury has, then I am not sure how a guilty verdict can possibly stand. He's looking out for Number 1. I'm not saying it's the right thing to do morally, but if his goal is to avoid prison (whether he's responsible or not), he's playing his cards correctly. Even if he wasn't involved, it is the "legally smart" thing to stay quiet. That said, obviously, the relationship was not good if he wasn't involved and he still won't help.He and his family definitely need to talk. If she is/was his fiancée and she's missing, he'd be all over the news trying to find out what happened. So @Finance85 , I get people are wrongfully accused, but with the Police, FBI, and her family all asking questions, and this being a national news story, his silence and unwillingness to talk is damning to him. He's guilty of something. What that is, we don't know yet.
Very possible. Something happened to her. If she was at the IHOP in Moab, there would be no reason to stay quiet (plus she would have called someone). She's gone. Why? Who knows, but he wants no part of the blame (deserved or not).I bet she killed herself and he was freaked everyone would think he did it.
Right now it appears he is hoping she is never found, dead or alive. I am sure the vehicle is being combed through inch by inch to see if there are any blood droplets, and his phone, see when and if he called anyone. I am sure they are also checking what towers his phone was bouncing off of. I wonder if the vehicle had gps coordinates. He doesn't appear to be a genius criminal, if he did this I am sure he left more than enough of a trail for the investigators to follow. It all comes down to can they find her. The next is was he connected to the other 2 murders in Moab or was it all coincidence they were in the same area, when 2 other women were killed.The silence certainly won't help him with a jury, but if that is all the jury has, then I am not sure how a guilty verdict can possibly stand. He's looking out for Number 1. I'm not saying it's the right thing to do morally, but if his goal is to avoid prison (whether he's responsible or not), he's playing his cards correctly. Even if he wasn't involved, it is the "legally smart" thing to stay quiet. That said, obviously, the relationship was not good if he wasn't involved and he still won't help.
Yeah, you are right. The body is necessary, or some ultra-suspicious physical evidence. But a simple discovery of a drop of blood here or there or hair is a tough hill for the prosecution. They were living in the thing. There is going to be hair, blood, sweat, etc. As sick as it is to say, as an outsider, this is a fascinating story to watch.Right now it appears he is hoping she is never found, dead or alive. I am sure the vehicle is being combed through inch by inch to see if there are any blood droplets, and his phone, see when and if he called anyone. I am sure they are also checking what towers his phone was bouncing off of. I wonder if the vehicle had gps coordinates. He doesn't appear to be a genius criminal, if he did this I am sure he left more than enough of a trail for the investigators to follow. It all comes down to can they find her. The next is was he connected to the other 2 murders in Moab or was it all coincidence they were in the same area, when 2 other women were killed.
Right now it appears he is hoping she is never found, dead or alive. I am sure the vehicle is being combed through inch by inch to see if there are any blood droplets, and his phone, see when and if he called anyone. I am sure they are also checking what towers his phone was bouncing off of. I wonder if the vehicle had gps coordinates. He doesn't appear to be a genius criminal, if he did this I am sure he left more than enough of a trail for the investigators to follow. It all comes down to can they find her. The next is was he connected to the other 2 murders in Moab or was it all coincidence they were in the same area, when 2 other women were killed.
But what about NOT helping the family find their missing daughter? What TF is that about?Yep. He’s receiving great advice. Public image is ****ed either way, so no use helping the prosecution. Terrible for her family, though.
Yeah. I didn't say he's not a piece of shit.But what about NOT helping the family find their missing daughter? What TF is that about?
Word. If they went to trial today, with what we currently know (basically nothing), I think the defense is granted a directed verdict before it even hits the jury.He is guilty as F IMO.
proving that beyond a shadow of a doubt will be difficult as F. Regardless of my opinion the prosecution would have to prove it if I was on jury.
Because innocent people also go to jail.I don’t understand why an innocent person wouldn’t talk
Yeah, I get it. But his silence at least makes me think he knows she’s dead. If he was worried about her he’d be talking.Because innocent people also go to jail.
Yes, they can tell.Also, the text sent on the 30th about no cell service at the park. Then he rolls into Florida two days later.
If he sent the text from her phone, can they tell where that phone was when the text was sent? Obviously, they don’t have the physical phone,
And if that’s the case there’d be no reason not to talk to the police.Or maybe she just told him to stop, he did, and she got out and he drove off. Maybe it was because of an argument, or maybe she needed to pee, or maybe she wanted to see a sight and he didn't.
Doesn't matter. We can all speculate. We can all tend to believe he's guilty outside the courtroom. There's no evidence the guy did anything criminal. There's not even evidence of a crime.
She is Schrodinger's cat.
It would be every reason not to talk to the police. What I don't understand is why he hasn't gone through his attorney to provide information.And if that’s the case there’d be no reason not to talk to the police.
I watch The Big Bang Theory, so I get that reference.She is Schrodinger's cat.
Absolutely no value. You passed the 7th grade right?Has he taken a polygraph? I would hope he’s been asked to.
Don't tell Finance85 of this suspicious development. People are rushing to judge the poor kid!Yes according to Cuomo Prime Time an hour ago.
I wouldn’t take one if they asked me about crimes before I was born. Get nervous enough you will look guilty. Those things are jokes.Has he taken a polygraph? I would hope he’s been asked to.