Awwww it's angry 😂🤣 bye bye usaid!SCOTUS has ruled the executive doesn't have the constitutional authority for a line item veto. Sorry jack@ss.
Awwww it's angry 😂🤣 bye bye usaid!SCOTUS has ruled the executive doesn't have the constitutional authority for a line item veto. Sorry jack@ss.
Oh, it will be cut and those who proposed the spending will be outed.![]()
Well… given the fact that pretty much all of it was congressionally appointed, cutting it is unconstitutional and the courts will quash it. Counting the chickens before they hatch.
they believe literally anything he posts to social media![]()
Well… given the fact that pretty much all of it was congressionally appointed, cutting it is unconstitutional and the courts will quash it. Counting the chickens before they hatch.
Aren't you one of those in the ann selzer thread? Sure you should talk, comrade?they believe literally anything he posts to social media
"We are going to fund those trans Peruvian comic strips and there's nothing you can do to stop us!!!!"![]()
Well… given the fact that pretty much all of it was congressionally appointed, cutting it is unconstitutional and the courts will quash it. Counting the chickens before they hatch.
"We are going to fund those trans Peruvian comic strips and there's nothing you can do to stop us!!!!"
You've lost the plot entirely.
if only there was a way for you to look to see if one of your little nonsequitors is true or notAren't you one of those in the ann selzer thread? Sure you should talk, comrade?