ADVERTISEMENT

DOGE: Rescission

seminole97

HB Legend
Jun 14, 2005
31,312
32,341
113
Seeking to codify spending cuts pursued by his Department of Government Efficiency, Elon Musk held a closed-door lunch with Republican senators on Wednesday. Musk was said to be "elated" with Sen. Rand Paul's recommendation to make the cuts stick with a relatively expeditious budget-slashing technique called "rescission." The approach could guide DOGE cuts around federal judges who consider executive-branch-initiated spending cuts as exceeding constitutional authority.

Rescission offers a means by which presidents can collaborate with Congress to cancel previously-appropriated spending. Enabled by Title X of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974, the rarely-used process starts with the president sending a special message to Congress, providing specific details about which budgetary authorities he wants to rescind.

With Republicans holding a narrow 53-47 Senate majority, one of the most attractive aspects of rescission is that it doesn't require 60 votes -- a simple majority suffices to grant the president's wish. Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley told reporters that Musk was "elated" with Paul's proposal: "I think he didn't realize it could be done at 51." According to South Carolina Sen. Lindsay Graham, it was the first time Musk had heard of the rescission process. He said Musk reacted by triumphantly lifting his arms into the air.

The approach promises to immunize DOGE spending cuts from federal judges who are skeptical about the executive branch's power to cut spending that was duly authorized by Congress.
 
Seeking to codify spending cuts pursued by his Department of Government Efficiency, Elon Musk held a closed-door lunch with Republican senators on Wednesday. Musk was said to be "elated" with Sen. Rand Paul's recommendation to make the cuts stick with a relatively expeditious budget-slashing technique called "rescission." The approach could guide DOGE cuts around federal judges who consider executive-branch-initiated spending cuts as exceeding constitutional authority.

Rescission offers a means by which presidents can collaborate with Congress to cancel previously-appropriated spending. Enabled by Title X of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974, the rarely-used process starts with the president sending a special message to Congress, providing specific details about which budgetary authorities he wants to rescind.

With Republicans holding a narrow 53-47 Senate majority, one of the most attractive aspects of rescission is that it doesn't require 60 votes -- a simple majority suffices to grant the president's wish. Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley told reporters that Musk was "elated" with Paul's proposal: "I think he didn't realize it could be done at 51." According to South Carolina Sen. Lindsay Graham, it was the first time Musk had heard of the rescission process. He said Musk reacted by triumphantly lifting his arms into the air.

The approach promises to immunize DOGE spending cuts from federal judges who are skeptical about the executive branch's power to cut spending that was duly authorized by Congress.
I mentioned this a while back when people were melting on here. Based on their insults and social media posts they didn’t understand.

It will be fun to go back a bump some posts so we can see just how willfully ignorant and partisan some posters are.
 
The approach promises to immunize DOGE spending cuts from federal judges who are skeptical about the executive branch's power to cut spending that was duly authorized by Congress.
I posted about this last night.

Wasn't that what much of the complaint was anyway? That DOGE (through the exec) didn't actually possess the authority to make these cuts? (see impoundments act -- writing was on the wall from the start, only question was whether or not they would listen to the courts)

Trump admin was dumb enough to wait for court losses to start rolling in.

The other complaint was the "hatchet" approach -- even Trump now says we need a "scalpel" (duhhh) -- which has started to cause a lot of blowback for congress, understandably.

This was all avoidable and Trump invited this criticism though his actions. (or lack thereof)

Hopefully congress stands as a firewall against stupid cuts and recission is judiciously used.

(although I think it would be prudent to draft a round of cuts that might garner bi-partisan support initially... better chance for public favorability)
 
Last edited:
I posted about this last night.

Wasn't that what much of the complaint was anyway? That DOGE (through the exec) didn't actually possess the authority to make these cuts? (see impoundments act -- writing was on the wall from the start, only question was whether or not they would listen to the courts)

Trump admin was dumb enough to wait for court losses to start rolling in.

The other complaint was the "hatchet" approach -- even Trump now says we need a "scalpel" (duhhh) -- which has started to cause a lot of blowback for congress, understandably.

This was all avoidable and Trump invited this criticism though his actions. (or lack thereof)

Hopefully congress stands as a firewall against stupid cuts and recission is judiciously used.

(although I think it would be prudent to draft a round of cuts that might garner bi-partisan support initially... better chance for public favorability)

Best of luck getting all those Reps who's farmers had crop sales contracts canceled w/ USAID cuts, etc etc etc
 
I’m in favor of smaller government, much smaller government, but this approach is exceedingly stupid.

Oh, and until you address the main cash cows—military and healthcare spending—this isn’t even going to put a dent in deficits, especially with Trump wanting to give away even more welfare to farmers, billionaires, and himself.

This DOGE phenomenon is nothing more than a dog and pony show for billionaires and trailer trash to fap to—the former making out like bandits and the latter taking it up the ass like they have been since antebellum.
 
What congress, those lazy dirty bastards won't lift a finger and do their jobs, The country is in trouble as the WORTHLESS congress will continue to hide and let a BRAIN DEAD IDIOT destroy our economy.
 
Well, at least it would be a way that wasn't using the Constitution as toilet paper. But it's been so wonderful up to this point.
 
I'm sure it won't work out this way, but this would be much better, because Republicans could force better discretion, say around things that many Republicans still support, like PEPFAR. Would be great to have some actual method and sanity to what is and what isn't cut.

But you'd have to have enough republicans willing to actually stand up for what they previously believed in. Doubtful I guess.
 
  • Like
Reactions: seminoleed
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT