ADVERTISEMENT

Equal Rights Amendment Ratified

"Control their own bodies" or "kill their unborn offspring"?

Anyway, men don't have the right to kill their children so how is that equal?

Thank you for this post. This is exactly why equal rights is so important, Idiot men like you. You don't care one bit about women, if they die, they die. Let's talk about children, specifically your kids. The way you raised your kids, you've been slowly killing them. They're a train wreck, and my kids didn't turn out that way, so you did something wrong. I say we throw your ass in jail for killing your kids future. They'll die a drug addict on the streets or if you're lucky in your back yard. Or they have a future of lung cancer from smoke.
 
It's too bad reproductive rights aren't a bigger issue for women, including yourself, so I don't think it will be a factor.

Giving it a woke name like "reproductive rights" doesn't change the fact that it's murder.
 
Giving it a woke name like "reproductive rights" doesn't change the fact that it's murder.

It isn't murder and what about when the baby is already dead inside the women, do you care about that? Sometimes there are things worse than death and that's exactly the life your kids are living because of the way you raised them. I would rather a women terminate her pregnancy than have more kids like yours in the world.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bcherod
It isn't murder and what about when the baby is already dead inside the women, do you care about that? Sometimes there are things worse than death and that's exactly the life your kids are living because of the way you raised them. I would rather a women terminate her pregnancy than have more kids like yours in the world.

LOL, they're all doing well now. Thanks for your concern.
 
It's too bad reproductive rights aren't a bigger issue for women, including yourself, so I don't think it will be a factor.
The problem with the left is that they don't see a distinction between a women's reproductive rights and the right of a baby to live. The issue is not as simple as leftists would like it to be.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ICHerky
The problem with the left is that they don't see a distinction between a women's reproductive rights and the right of a baby to live. The issue is not as simple as leftists would like it to be.

Your response is exactly why we need equal rights for all people to control their own lives. You feel the need to step on a women's right to choose, and more importantly, a women's right to live. If left up to you in the right, women would be nothing a baby maker to men.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: ICHerky and bcherod
LOL, they're all doing well now. Thanks for your concern.

My only concern is that you're passing judgement on others when you can't even control your own family. Oh, I'm sure your kids are productive citizens. Keep up the good work.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bcherod
Your response is exactly why we need equal rights for all people to control their own lives. You feel the need to step on a women's right to choose, and more importantly, a women's right to live. If left up to you in the right, women would be nothing a baby maker to men.

There's a really easy way to avoid being a baby maker... no abortion clinic required.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ICHerky and abby97
Your response is exactly why we need equal rights for all people to control their own lives. You feel the need to step on a women's right to choose, and more importantly, a women's right to live. If left up to you in the right, women would be nothing a baby maker to men.
If were up to you, a woman could kill a child at 9 months or even after birth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ICHerky
I’m of the age where the ERA first came out. It used to matter - or so those of us who were in college thought it mattered.
Now I’m not sure it even matters.
Of course not because your political affiliation tells you to believe that. ;)
 
You mean like your hyperbole that a dead fetus can't be removed and the mother just has to die?

Yes, try it in Texas. And that's just one situation. There should never be a case where a women in put in danger because she can't get medical help because men created a law that they don't have to abide by. It's very simple, it's a women's body and she should be able to control it. You have your own problem, focus on your issues.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: abby97
Of course not because your political affiliation tells you to believe that. ;)
I was a Democrat until 1990. So I guess you’re spot on. Being a Democrat totally influenced me.
After that I think I just forgot to shut up and go back into the kitchen. Barefoot of course.
 
1. As the survivor of a ruptured ectopic I (seriously) almost died, no hospital will refuse to save the life of a woman.
2. Those of you who are opposed to abortion, just exercise your right to never have one.
3. Roe v Wade was around for 50 years and the ERA had no part in it.
4. We are essentially back to 1972 when each state had different laws surrounding terminations. I was just out of college back then but if a woman had an unwanted pregnancy back then she went to NY for the weekend and it was terminated.
5. I think that people must have a serious conversation about responsibility for birth control because the ease of abortion seems to have put prevention on the “back burner “ and that needs to change. Don’t “make a baby” or just be a baby mama or baby daddy. Be a parent by choice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: abby97 and ICHerky
Unless he’s willing to share the responsibility for birth control.
No glove no love.
Since men are ok with telling a women what to do with their body, then men should give something up too. When they’re born their dna should go into a data base so they can be tracked for all their kids and thrown in jail if they can’t support them. If you can’t pay the dime then you’ll do some time.
 
Since men are ok with telling a women what to do with their body, then men should give something up too. When they’re born their dna should go into a data base so they can be tracked for all their kids and thrown in jail if they can’t support them. If you can’t pay the dime then you’ll do some time.
Sounds good but then those kids are on public assistance for sure. Happens too often.
 
Sounds good but then those kids are on public assistance for sure. Happens too often.
The kids will be on public assistance until their 18 no matter what (unless the father takes responsibility), but it's about accountability and if men don't want to take ownership of their kids then they will need to do one of two things, go to jail or get a vasectomy. They get to choose. If men are out getting women pregnant then we have to treat them like feral cats and TNR (trap, neutered, release) them. Without performing #2, then they don't get released back into the wild.
 
The kids will be on public assistance until their 18 no matter what (unless the father takes responsibility), but it's about accountability and if men don't want to take ownership of their kids then they will need to do one of two things, go to jail or get a vasectomy. They get to choose. If men are out getting women pregnant then we have to treat them like feral cats and TNR (trap, neutered, release) them. Without performing #2, then they don't get released back into the wild.
If you don’t mind my asking, how do you identify?
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT