Watch 2:20 through 2:50. "I work over there" "I work at that business" dude isn't going to jail for shit.
EVERY VIDEO OF KYLE RITTENHOUSE (KENOSHA SHOOTING)
- Thread starter Hawkeyerick
- Start date
indiscriminately? What flipping planet do you live on? it ain't Earth.
Also before we go down the "peaceful protest" road. The "protestors" had already started lighting the building on fire and smashing windows.
The harshest punishment should be reserved for the little douche’s neglectful/abusive parents. From the videos of him, he’s clearly swimming in the “slow” lane of the gene pool.
Wisconsin Court Clarifies New Self-Defense Rule
A Wisconsin court's recent ruling could affect defendants who claim self-defense when facing criminal charges. Call a Milwaukee defense lawyer to learn more.
Wisconsin law on self defense. He is going to walk.
Yeah because of all of the videos we have seen over the last month a guy defending his livelihood is the ultimate douche. Did you watch the old white guy get laid out while trying to put out the fire in his buisness? H
Sad situation all around. First off, this kid should have never been there but since he was he was obviously attacked and some Antifa thug threw a Molotov cocktail at him which led to some deaths. Watching these videos, I would be hard pressed to put this kid in jail even tho he made a horrible choice going there. I’m sure he has seen what happens to people online by these group of anarchists and he was afraid for his life. Looks like self defense to me
Did I see that correctly? After the initial shooting happened, the armored police vehicles roll in right past a young white male clearly carrying an ar15 or whatever and they just drive right past him?
The protestors immediately around him were trying to disarm him. He knew exactly what he was looking for when he put himself in the middle of that protest with an assault weapon.
Yes you saw that correctly. There were MANY people defending thier businesses while armed last night.
Odds they let a black man in same situation there do the same? Mine are zero.
That was not a protest. So much so that at 8 pm the police established it as a riot after curfew. It legally was a "riot".
an armed black militia marched in the south a few weeks back without interference
Interesting choice of words, but hardly surprising coming from you. To suggest he is 'golden' if he or a family member owns a property to justify murder....disgusting.
Neat the odds in the situation right there that a Black man or should we say kid in this instance would have been allowed to pass?
clearly the person that is trying to justify murder
Watch the op from 220 to 250. I may be wrong but I think he was defending his workplace. That isnt the best excuse for HIM to be there but thats enough for a lawyer.
Besides people there to protect neighborhoods and businesses with guns, some "protesters" had guns as well.
- Sep 13, 2002
- 97,935
- 204,250
- 113
Didn’t this kid show up at a place he has no connection to armed and looking for trouble? I honestly haven’t followed this story much at all, so don’t know, but this sure doesn’t seem to have any elements that would involve the castle doctrine.
I mean say if he was that still doesn’t take away from how shitty his parents are. No teen should be there with an AR. He went there looking for what he wanted and unfortunately he got it
Something somthing your a bvttfvck for continuing to condone people destroying peoples livelihoods under the veil of police injustice. It wasn't murder, that isnt even what he is being charged with, it was defending one's life.
Protesters? The protest was over and they were told by police to disperse and told it was an unlawful assembly. No longer protesters.
And "trying to disarm him" .... is that what you call a kick in the face?
Watch minute 220-250 of the op video. I think I know what I hear but I could be wrong.
You cannot provoke a fight and then claim self defense.
The Castle Doctrine is a special change to that rule that applies when a person is in their home, car, or place of business, and someone either has forcefully entered their home or is in the process of doing so.
The Case at Hand
A court recently clarified this new rule in a recent case. A man was in his home when his ex-girlfriend's new boyfriend and another man broke in. They began beating the man, breaking his nose and several ribs. While they were in his house, the man shot both of the intruders in the legs. The intruders fled, and the man kept shooting from his doorway as they ran down the street. The court found that the Castle Doctrine did not protect the man from criminal charges in relation to the shots fired once his assailants had left the house. After the attackers are no longer on the property, the doctrine does not apply. The court found the man guilty of second-degree reckless endangerment for firing the shots at the two fleeing men.
Firstly the accused was breaking the law. Second he was not in his home, vehicle or place of business.
From your link :.Wisconsin Court Clarifies New Self-Defense Rule
A Wisconsin court's recent ruling could affect defendants who claim self-defense when facing criminal charges. Call a Milwaukee defense lawyer to learn more.www.grgblaw.com
Wisconsin law on self defense. He is going to walk.
The Castle Doctrine is a special change to that rule that applies when a person is in their home, car, or place of business, and someone either has forcefully entered their home or is in the process of doing so.
The Case at Hand
A court recently clarified this new rule in a recent case. A man was in his home when his ex-girlfriend's new boyfriend and another man broke in. They began beating the man, breaking his nose and several ribs. While they were in his house, the man shot both of the intruders in the legs. The intruders fled, and the man kept shooting from his doorway as they ran down the street. The court found that the Castle Doctrine did not protect the man from criminal charges in relation to the shots fired once his assailants had left the house. After the attackers are no longer on the property, the doctrine does not apply. The court found the man guilty of second-degree reckless endangerment for firing the shots at the two fleeing men.
Firstly the accused was breaking the law. Second he was not in his home, vehicle or place of business.
Not sure. Not sure how cops had been handling people with guns when they noticed them that night.
I mean, you can play the same game -- and lots of people have -- with the unarmed shooting of black men. You know, the George Floyd incident. Would that really have happened if he were white?
But then you do the research and you find analogs for the same thing happening to white people. And you look at the statistics and it's supported. Apparently, yes.
And so... I question your assumption quite a bit. I'm not sure you really have anything there.
But prior to that, there hadn't been any shots fired. Once shots were fired the cops roll on, anyone armed should be taken down for everyone's safety until they can figure out what happened.
.Wisconsin Court Clarifies New Self-Defense Rule
A Wisconsin court's recent ruling could affect defendants who claim self-defense when facing criminal charges. Call a Milwaukee defense lawyer to learn more.
Wisconsin law on self defense.
He’s got at least 2 problems I think:
Illegal possession of the weapon;
“and that the 3rd person’s property the person is protecting ... is a merchant and the actor is the merchant’s employee or agent.”
Couple quick online articles say he doesn’t work at the dealership, but rather joined an armed group that asked the Sheriff to deputize them and the Sheriff refused.
Articles say he works as a lifeguard at the Y.
Those units had interacted with the individuals protecting businesses earlier in the night. They knew he was not an arsonist/rioter/looter like the antifa in the area. watch the videos.
Odds are they did...Are you aware the protesters had firearms?
Armed BLM Rioters Surround Police Vehicle, Shout Orders at Cops – WATCH
Armed BLM Rioters Surround Police Vehicle, Shout Orders at Cops - WATCH | News Thud
Gun-toting mob shuts down street in Kenosha, Wisconsin, confronts sheriff's vehicle on 24th August 2020 @ 5.00pm The armed mob surrounded the sheriff's vehicle and yelled orders at the cops inside An armed mob of violent Black Lives Matter rioters was seen stopping and surrounding a police...
newsthud.com
I dont think so man, it had already been declared a riot by the police, and the first guy was shot on what i think is his employers property. Im not a lawyer.
Yes I'm sure if 1 of them were on their own armed like this pos it would have been entirely the same.Odds are they did...Are you aware the protesters had firearms?
Armed BLM Rioters Surround Police Vehicle, Shout Orders at Cops – WATCH
Armed BLM Rioters Surround Police Vehicle, Shout Orders at Cops - WATCH | News Thud
Gun-toting mob shuts down street in Kenosha, Wisconsin, confronts sheriff's vehicle on 24th August 2020 @ 5.00pm The armed mob surrounded the sheriff's vehicle and yelled orders at the cops inside An armed mob of violent Black Lives Matter rioters was seen stopping and surrounding a police...
You’re advocating for adolescent vigilantes with assault weapons?
He wasn’t defending the car dealership when he shot those rioters who were assaulting him, he was defending his life.
He wasn't on his own, as there were other armed citizens out and about as well as rioters with guns.
Just last night he was arguing about the degree of blame/responsibility Ahmaud Arbery should face for his own death.
Just an FYI, I don't think phen fran is a poster worth engaging with if race is even remotely related.
