ADVERTISEMENT

Faculty group censures Harreld over ethics

cigaretteman

HB King
May 29, 2001
79,448
62,576
113
This is not starting out well:

A faculty assembly at the University of Iowa has approved a motion of censure against the incoming UI president for including inaccuracies on his resume during the recent search process.

Several faculty, student and staff groups on campus have issued "no confidence" votes or other complaints about the recent search president process overseen by the Iowa Board of Regents. Those censures, however, largely have stopped short of including Bruce Harreld directly in the criticism.

Harreld was selected unanimously by the regents Sept. 3 as UI's 21st president.

After meeting in closed session Wednesday afternoon, Faculty Assembly of the UI College of Liberal Arts and Sciences unanimously approved a motion of censure against Harreld for failing to uphold "the highest ethical standards" and violating professional ethics by misrepresenting his recent work experience and publication history.

"I think the message is that values and ethics matter," said Bob McMurray, a professor of psychology and a member of the assembly that represents 700 faculty members in the college. "This is not a call for any action. This is not saying that we will not support President Harreld. ... But it is a statement that we expect people to behave with intellectual honesty."

On his resume, Harreld listed his most recent employment as managing principal of Executing Strategy, LLC, in Avon, Colo. During his Sept. 1 Tuesday’s public forum, Harreld noted that the listing had been a mistake. He used the name of a limited liability company that he had been using in Massachusetts but no longer needed now that his clients wanted to work with him to assume liability directly. He allowed that company to lapse.

“So that’s ‘Shame on me.' I too quickly pulled it out of my head and put it on the resume," he said. "There's no Colorado corporation. ... It’s me personally working.”

Harreld's resume also included 12 items in the section on publication history. Harreld did not note, however, that that most of those publications were co-authored.

The motion from the faculty assembly notes that the failure to list co-authors is in violation of the UI Operations Manual.

"I'd love to see the rest of the scholarly community join us," McMurray said. "This more of a statement from the faculty of the college that, while the regents have the right to do whatever they want, we are not going to abandon our values.

Harreld was one of four finalists to replace Sally Mason, who retired this summer after eight years as UI president. The other finalists include a college president and two university provosts. An online survey conducted by the UI chapter of the American Association of University Professors found that less than 3 percent of the participants considered Harreld qualified for the job.

Regent officials told the Associated Press that they had no comment on the censure, but shrugged off the criticism.

"We're not concerned about the resume," said Josh Lehman, the board's senior communications director.

Regent President Bruce Rastetter has said that Harreld was chosen because of his decades long experience in the 1980s and 1990s helping to turn around companies like Boston Chicken and IBM. Rastetter also was impressed with Harreld's six years experience teaching at Harvard Business School.

http://www.press-citizen.com/story/...-group-censures-harreld-over-ethics/72735828/
 
Certainly not the smooth transition the big wigs had hoped for, I'm sure. This has all the makings of a rocky tenure.
 
I just don't get the draw of this guy? He lied on his resume, made up companies he worked for, and pretended that he wrote papers he didn't. And oh yeah, he has zero experience. Way to screw the pooch, regents.
 
Last edited:
This is not starting out well:

A faculty assembly at the University of Iowa has approved a motion of censure against the incoming UI president for including inaccuracies on his resume during the recent search process.

Several faculty, student and staff groups on campus have issued "no confidence" votes or other complaints about the recent search president process overseen by the Iowa Board of Regents. Those censures, however, largely have stopped short of including Bruce Harreld directly in the criticism.

Harreld was selected unanimously by the regents Sept. 3 as UI's 21st president.

After meeting in closed session Wednesday afternoon, Faculty Assembly of the UI College of Liberal Arts and Sciences unanimously approved a motion of censure against Harreld for failing to uphold "the highest ethical standards" and violating professional ethics by misrepresenting his recent work experience and publication history.

"I think the message is that values and ethics matter," said Bob McMurray, a professor of psychology and a member of the assembly that represents 700 faculty members in the college. "This is not a call for any action. This is not saying that we will not support President Harreld. ... But it is a statement that we expect people to behave with intellectual honesty."

On his resume, Harreld listed his most recent employment as managing principal of Executing Strategy, LLC, in Avon, Colo. During his Sept. 1 Tuesday’s public forum, Harreld noted that the listing had been a mistake. He used the name of a limited liability company that he had been using in Massachusetts but no longer needed now that his clients wanted to work with him to assume liability directly. He allowed that company to lapse.

“So that’s ‘Shame on me.' I too quickly pulled it out of my head and put it on the resume," he said. "There's no Colorado corporation. ... It’s me personally working.”

Harreld's resume also included 12 items in the section on publication history. Harreld did not note, however, that that most of those publications were co-authored.

The motion from the faculty assembly notes that the failure to list co-authors is in violation of the UI Operations Manual.

"I'd love to see the rest of the scholarly community join us," McMurray said. "This more of a statement from the faculty of the college that, while the regents have the right to do whatever they want, we are not going to abandon our values.

Harreld was one of four finalists to replace Sally Mason, who retired this summer after eight years as UI president. The other finalists include a college president and two university provosts. An online survey conducted by the UI chapter of the American Association of University Professors found that less than 3 percent of the participants considered Harreld qualified for the job.

Regent officials told the Associated Press that they had no comment on the censure, but shrugged off the criticism.

"We're not concerned about the resume," said Josh Lehman, the board's senior communications director.

Regent President Bruce Rastetter has said that Harreld was chosen because of his decades long experience in the 1980s and 1990s helping to turn around companies like Boston Chicken and IBM. Rastetter also was impressed with Harreld's six years experience teaching at Harvard Business School.

http://www.press-citizen.com/story/...-group-censures-harreld-over-ethics/72735828/
Yeah, that's why they're holding Harreld accountable for his misrepresentation :rolleyes:

I think what the faculty is really pissed about is the fact that they don't matter. 2/3 of the U of I is the UIHC, and that is very much a business. The hospital has a different view of him then the faculty.
 
I think what the faculty is really pissed about is the fact that they don't matter. 2/3 of the U of I is the UIHC, and that is very much a business. The hospital has a different view of him then the faculty.
Not everyone in the UIHC.

Again, it's not so much Harreld himself, but how the BoR and specifically Rastetter bungled this whole thing.

We already have Kates running the show at UIHC from a CEO angle. Robillard has already integrated the CCOM, UIHC, and UI physicians group. There will likely be some changes yet to come. But, personally, I don't foresee wholesale changes on either side of the river with Harreld. There might be more of a dedicated effort to combine redundant services (I'm seeing some of these proposals/plans right now for a couple of UIHC departments), perhaps accelerate early retirements and with it position eliminations (note: not job cuts). But, I honestly don't see the University of Iowa suddenly changing its entire focus from a public academic, research, and healthcare university to that of a corporate-based model institution.

The main problem is there is a lack of trust with the BoR and by extension (unfortunately, and perhaps wrongly) with Harreld. The fact is he will need faculty support to get any significant changes made; unilateral changes don't come very easily in higher academia. Otherwise, it might end up being a tenure of nothingness.
 
Not everyone in the UIHC.

Again, it's not so much Harreld himself, but how the BoR and specifically Rastetter bungled this whole thing.

We already have Kates running the show at UIHC from a CEO angle. Robillard has already integrated the CCOM, UIHC, and UI physicians group. There will likely be some changes yet to come. But, personally, I don't foresee wholesale changes on either side of the river with Harreld. There might be more of a dedicated effort to combine redundant services (I'm seeing some of these proposals/plans right now for a couple of UIHC departments), perhaps accelerate early retirements and with it position eliminations (note: not job cuts). But, I honestly don't see the University of Iowa suddenly changing its entire focus from a public academic, research, and healthcare university to that of a corporate-based model institution.

The main problem is there is a lack of trust with the BoR and by extension (unfortunately, and perhaps wrongly) with Harreld. The fact is he will need faculty support to get any significant changes made; unilateral changes don't come very easily in higher academia. Otherwise, it might end up being a tenure of nothingness.
If even half of what you say is correct... he may not even make it to campus.
 
This is not starting out well:

A faculty assembly at the University of Iowa has approved a motion of censure against the incoming UI president for including inaccuracies on his resume during the recent search process.

Several faculty, student and staff groups on campus have issued "no confidence" votes or other complaints about the recent search president process overseen by the Iowa Board of Regents. Those censures, however, largely have stopped short of including Bruce Harreld directly in the criticism.

Harreld was selected unanimously by the regents Sept. 3 as UI's 21st president.

After meeting in closed session Wednesday afternoon, Faculty Assembly of the UI College of Liberal Arts and Sciences unanimously approved a motion of censure against Harreld for failing to uphold "the highest ethical standards" and violating professional ethics by misrepresenting his recent work experience and publication history.

"I think the message is that values and ethics matter," said Bob McMurray, a professor of psychology and a member of the assembly that represents 700 faculty members in the college. "This is not a call for any action. This is not saying that we will not support President Harreld. ... But it is a statement that we expect people to behave with intellectual honesty."

On his resume, Harreld listed his most recent employment as managing principal of Executing Strategy, LLC, in Avon, Colo. During his Sept. 1 Tuesday’s public forum, Harreld noted that the listing had been a mistake. He used the name of a limited liability company that he had been using in Massachusetts but no longer needed now that his clients wanted to work with him to assume liability directly. He allowed that company to lapse.

“So that’s ‘Shame on me.' I too quickly pulled it out of my head and put it on the resume," he said. "There's no Colorado corporation. ... It’s me personally working.”

Harreld's resume also included 12 items in the section on publication history. Harreld did not note, however, that that most of those publications were co-authored.

The motion from the faculty assembly notes that the failure to list co-authors is in violation of the UI Operations Manual.

"I'd love to see the rest of the scholarly community join us," McMurray said. "This more of a statement from the faculty of the college that, while the regents have the right to do whatever they want, we are not going to abandon our values.

Harreld was one of four finalists to replace Sally Mason, who retired this summer after eight years as UI president. The other finalists include a college president and two university provosts. An online survey conducted by the UI chapter of the American Association of University Professors found that less than 3 percent of the participants considered Harreld qualified for the job.

Regent officials told the Associated Press that they had no comment on the censure, but shrugged off the criticism.

"We're not concerned about the resume," said Josh Lehman, the board's senior communications director.

Regent President Bruce Rastetter has said that Harreld was chosen because of his decades long experience in the 1980s and 1990s helping to turn around companies like Boston Chicken and IBM. Rastetter also was impressed with Harreld's six years experience teaching at Harvard Business School.

http://www.press-citizen.com/story/...-group-censures-harreld-over-ethics/72735828/
Immaturity abounds at the UI
 
One would think Harreld would be present at the UI and reaching out to his critics. Instead, he has been persona non grata. If he is doing something, its been pretty quiet.
 
Funny thing is, there were really no inaccuracies. I've never seen a group more delusional about their perceived self-importance that they would continue to show so much ignorance as to the mechanisms a self-employed individual uses to receive compensation for his work.

I guess when you have only had a job force funded by tax dollars, you don't really need to care.
 
The faculty that are doing this are an absolute embarrassment.

And, not that it matters, but stating his residence as the place of business of his consulting company, rather than where that company was legally incorporated, isn't misrepresenting anything.
No shit. the concept of a DBA vs legal entity isn't exactly rocket science. and in the case, who gives a shit? he hadn't even applied as of a day before the deadline despite being recruited for weeks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 73chief
Funny thing is, there were really no inaccuracies. I've never seen a group more delusional about their perceived self-importance that they would continue to show so much ignorance as to the mechanisms a self-employed individual uses to receive compensation for his work.

I guess when you have only had a job force funded by tax dollars, you don't really need to care.

I dont care that he put the LLC down if he was actually working. I'd like to know how much he was actually working.

You are simply wrong to state there were no inaccuracies, though. That LLC wasnt active for several years. He can claim it was an accident, but I bet he did it because it sounds better on the resume than I did some private consulting for the last year and a half.
 
This is not starting out well:

A faculty assembly at the University of Iowa has approved a motion of censure against the incoming UI president for including inaccuracies on his resume during the recent search process.

Several faculty, student and staff groups on campus have issued "no confidence" votes or other complaints about the recent search president process overseen by the Iowa Board of Regents. Those censures, however, largely have stopped short of including Bruce Harreld directly in the criticism.

Harreld was selected unanimously by the regents Sept. 3 as UI's 21st president.

After meeting in closed session Wednesday afternoon, Faculty Assembly of the UI College of Liberal Arts and Sciences unanimously approved a motion of censure against Harreld for failing to uphold "the highest ethical standards" and violating professional ethics by misrepresenting his recent work experience and publication history.

"I think the message is that values and ethics matter," said Bob McMurray, a professor of psychology and a member of the assembly that represents 700 faculty members in the college. "This is not a call for any action. This is not saying that we will not support President Harreld. ... But it is a statement that we expect people to behave with intellectual honesty."

On his resume, Harreld listed his most recent employment as managing principal of Executing Strategy, LLC, in Avon, Colo. During his Sept. 1 Tuesday’s public forum, Harreld noted that the listing had been a mistake. He used the name of a limited liability company that he had been using in Massachusetts but no longer needed now that his clients wanted to work with him to assume liability directly. He allowed that company to lapse.

“So that’s ‘Shame on me.' I too quickly pulled it out of my head and put it on the resume," he said. "There's no Colorado corporation. ... It’s me personally working.”

Harreld's resume also included 12 items in the section on publication history. Harreld did not note, however, that that most of those publications were co-authored.

The motion from the faculty assembly notes that the failure to list co-authors is in violation of the UI Operations Manual.

"I'd love to see the rest of the scholarly community join us," McMurray said. "This more of a statement from the faculty of the college that, while the regents have the right to do whatever they want, we are not going to abandon our values.

Harreld was one of four finalists to replace Sally Mason, who retired this summer after eight years as UI president. The other finalists include a college president and two university provosts. An online survey conducted by the UI chapter of the American Association of University Professors found that less than 3 percent of the participants considered Harreld qualified for the job.

Regent officials told the Associated Press that they had no comment on the censure, but shrugged off the criticism.

"We're not concerned about the resume," said Josh Lehman, the board's senior communications director.

Regent President Bruce Rastetter has said that Harreld was chosen because of his decades long experience in the 1980s and 1990s helping to turn around companies like Boston Chicken and IBM. Rastetter also was impressed with Harreld's six years experience teaching at Harvard Business School.

http://www.press-citizen.com/story/...-group-censures-harreld-over-ethics/72735828/


Wow
He really should have known every detail in the UI Operations manual and rules for publications.
Also - me and my older brother talked last night then voted 2-0 for censure of these faculty.
 
I dont care that he put the LLC down if he was actually working. I'd like to know how much he was actually working.

You are simply wrong to state there were no inaccuracies, though. That LLC wasnt active for several years. He can claim it was an accident, but I bet he did it because it sounds better on the resume than I did some private consulting for the last year and a half.
I bet he did more work than all the faculty members combined.
 
At least five members of the Iowa Board of Regents met with Bruce Harreld in the weeks before he was selected as the next president of the University of Iowa, according to a statement released Thursday by board president Bruce Rastetter.

The meetings are being viewed by a skeptical UI campus community as further evidence that Harreld, a businessman with no experience in university administration, was given preferential treatment during the recent search process.

During a series of July 30 meetings in Ames, Harreld met regents Katie Mulholland, Milt Dakovich, Mary Andringa and Larry McKibben, according to Rastetter. Harreld also had dinner that evening with Iowa State University President Steven Leath.

Along with Rastetter, who had met with Harreld on July 8 in Iowa City, Mulholland and Dakovich were on the 21-member UI Presidential Search and Screen Committee tasked with vetting presidential candidates.

“It certainly is getting more and more difficult to believe that the regents meant it when they said they would take campus input into account and that the search was a real search in which all the finalists had a shot,” said Christina Bohannan, president of the UI Faculty Senate and a member of the search committee.

Bohannan, who said she did not know about the July 30 meetings until Thursday, said there is nothing inherently wrong with a prospective presidential candidate visiting a campus and seeking out more information before making a decision about whether to apply for the job. She, for example, met with Harreld for lunch in Iowa City on July 8 — a meeting that had been arranged by Jean Robillard, the chairman of the search committee and UI's interim president, and attended by Rastetter.

But Bohannan said she has concerns about Harreld's meeting with two members of the regents, Andringa and McKibben, who weren't on the committee.

“That opportunity gave (Harreld) more time with the people who would ultimately make the decision," Bohannan said. "The other finalists had only their interviews (with the full board) on the final day.”

Rastetter, who recruited Harreld along with five other candidates for president, said in his statement that the meetings in Ames and Iowa City were appropriate and within the goals of the presidential search process.

"I considered Mr. Harreld’s requests for these additional meetings on July 30 not only appropriate, but due diligence on his part," Rastetter said. "He wanted to gather as many facts as he could about the position. I appreciate the fact that he was interested enough to want to do his research on the job, and took his time gathering facts."

Rastetter did not attend the July 30 meetings, but he did facilitate them. Emails released Thursday show an invitation to the Ames meeting sent to Andringa from an email account at Summit Agricultural Group, where Rastetter is CEO.

The subsequent email exchange between Harreld and Andringa, who also serves as CEO of Vermeer Corporation in Pella, show that the former IBM executive was still considering whether to apply for the UI job.

In a July 31 email to Andringa — a day after he met with her — Harreld attached an article on “punctuated change" that he had co-authored for an essay collection titled, "Leading Sustainable Change."

“I haven’t had the time to ‘study’ it, but in skimming it, I totally agree with the premise, the process and the opportunity for Proactive Punctuated Change!” Andringa wrote in reply a few hours later. "I look forward to spending some more time with the materials you so graciously shared.”

Andringa also urged Harreld to stay open to the idea of serving as UI president and “to give us in Iowa a chance to tap into your great skill set, experience and passion for excellence through strategic change.”

“Higher education, as you articulated in our meeting, is heading toward crisis,” she said. “Crisis necessitates change — it may be the big challenge that can energize you in the next 5 years.”

That same day, the members of the search committee received access to the application materials of the 46 applicants for president. The committee eventually chose Harreld to be among the nine candidates who took part Aug. 11 and 12 in airport interviews in the Chicago area.

http://www.press-citizen.com/story/...met-harreld-month-before-interviews/72761236/
 
Ciggy just beat me to it. This is very troubling. I jokingly said the fix was in when Harreld was announced. Now, I am not so sure that cannot be openly said. Some of you will misunderstand the difference between a public job, and a private job. Some of you will not understand the optics of this situation, and how it relates to hiring a person to lead a public university. Did the other candidates receive such attention and access?
I do not know the inner workings of the BoR, but, did the regents that met with Harreld generally align themselves with Bruce Rastetter? And, did him not attending allow him a little deniability, even though he was the driving force behind the meetings?
I am not joking at all when I say at this point Harreld and Rastetter need to both appear in public and answer all questions put to them about this hiring process. Both of them need to go to ground zero on this, and answer fully all questions about any communication between them. Were private emails and cell phones used. Again, not joking. A public university post hiring has to have transparency. I am not seeing it here.
I want Harreld to succeed. I want the University of Iowa to succeed. The worst thing in my mind right now is for Harreld to be pushed out before he takes over. However, he must come clean. He needs to go on the carpet and take every question asked, and he needs to have Rastetter with him.
 
Wow
He really should have known every detail in the UI Operations manual and rules for publications.
Also - me and my older brother talked last night then voted 2-0 for censure of these faculty.
Actually, anybody applying for any academic position should know and understand the rules of listing publications (all co-authors are to be included) on your CV. This is the standard at every institution whether you're talking about applying for an adjunct instructor position at Kirkwood or senior level faculty member at a large university. The publications he listed would indicate he was the sole author or at least 1st author on all of the publications. This in fact is not the case; on many of the publications he was not the first author (ie., primary writer/contributor). In academics, it's critical to list ALL authors, especially when you are implying you were the first author.

As far as the LLC, I'm not familiar enough with those standards. If he said it was just a mistake on his part and apologized for the error, that's good enough for me.
 
The faculty that are doing this are an absolute embarrassment.

And, not that it matters, but stating his residence as the place of business of his consulting company, rather than where that company was legally incorporated, isn't misrepresenting anything.
On the contrary, I think the regents need to suffer some heat from this. They clearly mismanaged this hiring process, taking on a candidate who looks to be a poor fit for the job, all why keeping most of the process behind closed doors with the likelihood that they knew they were going to hire Herreld even before they looked at any other candidates.
 
“Higher education, as you articulated in our meeting, is heading toward crisis,” she said. “Crisis necessitates change — it may be the big challenge that can energize you in the next 5 years.”

I found this line interesting. Did Harreld indicate he needs a challenge to energize him and did he articulate what exactly he believes the crisis is?
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
Liberals are the lowest of life forms.
59381426.jpg
 
I found this line interesting. Did Harreld indicate he needs a challenge to energize him and did he articulate what exactly he believes the crisis is?
And that appears to be the rub. What are Herreld's exact plans here? I could be wrong, but all I've heard from him so far are more general ideas about working more with faculty and students and innovating new ideas. That's all well and good, but what are these exact ideas? The fact is that he has zero experience in this role, so the proof is on him to show that he actually has detailed plans to better our university. Simply throwing out a few general ideas, without specifics, does little reassure anyone of his ability to lead a major university.
 
Liberals are the lowest of life forms.
This is a really stupid comment, and that's something coming from you.

You obviously have no idea what anybody is actually talking about on this particular issue. You obviously know nothing about higher academics and academic integrity.

Why don't you let those who actually have experience in this venue do the commenting. Maybe you can observe and learn something useful for a change.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
I'm sure all the professors, academics, etc. think they're doing God's work here - but as someone who has never worked in academia (which would be most of us) this just looks more and more pathetic with each passing day. In the real world - top execs get hired you don't like. A big portion of the time, the fix is in on that hire. You either deal with it and find a way to work through it or you move on.

Maybe I'd feel different if my view was from the ivory tower of a university - but I think the majority of us who don't and won't work at a university view the squeaky wheels as looking like petulant children. Outside in it looks pathetic and petty.
 
I'm sure all the professors, academics, etc. think they're doing God's work here - but as someone who has never worked in academia (which would be most of us) this just looks more and more pathetic with each passing day. In the real world - top execs get hired you don't like. A big portion of the time, the fix is in on that hire. You either deal with it and find a way to work through it or you move on.

Maybe I'd feel different if my view was from the ivory tower of a university - but I think the majority of us who don't and won't work at a university view the squeaky wheels as looking like petulant children. Outside in it looks pathetic and petty.

Again big difference between the way the private world works and a public university.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
This is a really stupid comment, and that's something coming from you.

You obviously have no idea what anybody is actually talking about on this particular issue. You obviously know nothing about higher academics and academic integrity.

Why don't you let those who actually have experience in this venue do the commenting. Maybe you can observe and learn something useful for a change.
My old neighbor was a rhetoric professor at the U of I, his opinion was the majority of the prof's there were "drawing a paycheck with no accountability". I'll take his word for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 73chief
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT