where the fvck do you live?They should pass a federal bill to ban driving in people's yard. That should be a federal crime.
where the fvck do you live?They should pass a federal bill to ban driving in people's yard. That should be a federal crime.
If you want boys disguised as girls competing in legitimate girls’ sports, then don’t take the federal money. It’s not complicated.The trick is however, that very few schools don’t accept some amount of federal funding, so they have an opening to have a say.
It would be a murky legal area I think, but I don’t think the federal government would have no say whatsoever if they wanted to.
I really don’t feel like diving into this topic yet again, but do you really think boys are dressing up as girls just to play sports?If you want boys disguised as girls competing in legitimate girls’ sports, then don’t take the federal money. It’s not complicated.
The boy’s motive for disguising himself as a girl is irrelevant. Boys disguised as girls should be kept out of girls’ sports simply because of common decency, regardless of motive.I really don’t feel like diving into this topic yet again, but do you really think boys are dressing up as girls just to play sports?
The trans issue is far more layered and complicated than some people want to believe. And no, barring extreme circumstances, I don’t believe underage kids should be undergoing medical treatment above receiving therapy.
That you see it as a disguise tells me everything.The boy’s motive for disguising himself as a girl is irrelevant. Boys disguised as girls should be kept out of girls’ sports simply because of common decency, regardless of motive.
Agreed - there's no point trying to have a normal conversation with simpletons and bigotsThat you see it as a disguise tells me everything.
Have a nice day.
Your last sentence is laughable. You also don't need to explain Title IX to me...I'm on the same side of the argument...I'm NOT putting this BS issue ahead of homelessness. Or a myriad of other things that Democrats care about that Republicans ONLY PRETEND to.Tom,
I like you, but you asked for it.
Title IX is a federal law and therefore within the purview of the federal government. Your questions regarding how many girls have been affected are irrelevant. Title IX exists for a reason along with laws prohibiting sexual relationships between teachers and students. The prevalence of incidents is inconsequential to the merit AND necessity of those laws.
What the federal government should do about homelessness is not really on my radar or a federal matter IMO. If, however, the playbook to address homelessness has been drafted by Gavin Newsom and California Democrats, I hope the federal government passes.
Last, the US Congress can multitask.
I was being sarcastic.where the fvck do you live?
Yes. It tells you I’m a realist who is not going to validate a mentally ill boy’s delusions.That you see it as a disguise tells me everything.
Have a nice day.
I said government can multitask. That doesn’t mean I think they actually do.Your last sentence is laughable. You also don't need to explain Title IX to me...I'm on the same side of the argument...I'm NOT putting this BS issue ahead of homelessness. Or a myriad of other things that Democrats care about that Republicans ONLY PRETEND to.
Republicans used this issue that affects next to nobody as a lightning rod for idiots. IT ALWAYS WORKS.