ADVERTISEMENT

Family of Iowa boy who died after adenoids surgery adds state to lawsuit

cigaretteman

HR King
May 29, 2001
77,442
58,937
113
A Muscatine County family that last year sued Iowa City-based ENT Medical Services and one of its otolaryngologists after a 2-year-old died following a routine procedure to put tubes in his ears and remove his adenoids has added a third defendant to its lawsuit: the state of Iowa, for its oversight of the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics.



“Through the course of discovery, information relating to an additional potentially liable party has come to the plaintiffs’ attention,” according to a Friday amendment to the petition that the estate of Louden Lofgren first filed in February 2022.


The amendment hinges on allegations a UIHC resident was involved in the child’s operation — without informing or receiving consent from the family.



“Dr. Ryan Smith’s performance of the April 2, 2021 adenoidectomy on Louden Lofgren without identifying himself or obtaining permission from Maggie Lofgren to operate on her son constituted a medical battery,” according to the amended lawsuit.


The toddler — which, according to posts from the Muscatine Republicans on social media, is the grandson of state Sen. Mark Lofgren, R-Muscatine — went in for tube placement in both ears and an adenoidectomy in April 2021 at the Iowa City Ambulatory Surgery Center. According to the lawsuit, Thomas Simpson, an otolaryngologist and chair of the Iowa City Ambulatory Surgery Center’s board of directors, was the “primary surgeon” for the procedure — with assistance of Smith, a fourth-year medical resident.


Toward the end of the adenoidectomy, “very brisk bleeding” began, requiring quick action to control, according to the lawsuit. After the bleeding appeared to have been resolved, and as the child was waking up, bleeding resumed along with coughing — filling his oral cavity, according to the family’s lawsuit.


With labs showing anemia and low hemoglobin levels — among other issues — Louden was transferred and admitted the same day to Mercy Iowa City, where he received a partial blood transfusion, according to the lawsuit. At discharge, on April 4, 2021, he still had an increased heart rate and did not receive a repeat check of his hemoglobin following the transfusion, the family reported.


Nursing documentation from the operating room indicated UIHC resident Smith was “at the head of the bed when the intraoperative bleeding began,” and Simpson was at the head of the bed to resume the operation two minutes later, according to both the original and amended lawsuits.


“Dr. Simpson’s note reads as if he was the primary surgeon for the entirety of the procedure and does not identify who was operating on Louden when the hemorrhage began,” according to both versions of the lawsuit.


Daily News​


Newsletter Signup
checkmark-yellow.png
Delivered to your inbox every day






The amended lawsuit adding the state as a defendant notes Smith — at no time before the surgery or after — introduced himself to the child’s mom or identified himself as a medical resident who would be performing part of her son’s surgery.


“Prior to Louden’s surgery, Maggie Lofgren was not informed and was not otherwise made aware that Dr. Smith, a medical resident, would be performing any portion of the surgery,” according to the updated lawsuit.


While an inpatient at Mercy Iowa City, Simpson “made no effort to follow up and determine the source of the significant and excessive bleeding,” according to the family, which reported taking him within 24 hours of his Mercy discharge to the UIHC emergency room where he was “pale” and “listless.”


The child was admitted to UIHC for dehydration and symptomatic blood loss and received a blood transfusion, stabilizing him until he was discharged April 7, 2021. Five days later, while at home eating dinner, Louden began to hemorrhage and go into cardiac arrest, according to the lawsuit.


“He was emergently taken to Trinity Hospital in Muscatine and then transferred to UIHC, where drastic efforts to save him were unsuccessful and he passed away shortly thereafter,” according to the lawsuit, noting he was 2 years old when he died.


In new allegations, the family accused the resident Smith of failing to obtain informed consent “prior to performing the adenoidectomy portion of the surgery on Louden.”


“Defendant State of Iowa is vicariously liable for the negligence and battery of its employees, physicians, residents and others who may have been involved in the care of Louden Lofgren, including Ryan Smith,” according to the amended lawsuit, which seeks damages for medical bills, losses from the premature death and compensation for pain and suffering.


The lawsuit reports the family filed claims March 23 with the State Appeal Board but that “after more than six months of inaction by the State Appeal Board, said claims are considered denied.”


In previous court documents, Simpson and ENT have denied many of the allegations — including those alleging pain and suffering, medical expenses and deprived earnings. Defendants said they have “insufficient information to admit or deny the allegations” against Smith and therefor deny them.

 
  • Sad
Reactions: JupiterHawk
What a sad story. I’m guessing residents are involved a lot and the parents aren’t signing off on any of it.
My wife and I had our baby at the university a couple of months ago and it was a revolving door of who was in and out of our room. It would be nice if they had a non-teaching portion of the hospital and a section of the hospital that was all teaching. Or they could tone it down somehow.
 
Last edited:
Sad, sad story.

Reading it, sort of seems to me like Mercy Iowa City is the main issue…never rechecked the levels and never really looked at source of bleeding?

But UIHC had him admitted too…who knows, I’m not an expert but a really sad story.

I’m always leery of surgery’s that are done in these “ambulatory” centers….and Mercy IC in general.

It’s also sad in cases like this with folks living outside the metro areas….you wonder how that distance to level 1 care factors in.
 
Tragic case all the way around. The resident angle is dirty pool by the attorney to cast a wider net for monetary gain. They can rope in the University of Iowa and the State. The standard of care does not require the resident to introduce themselves. It's courtesy but not required. The attending is the primary surgeon and thus carries responsibility. Does the entire OR team have to go seek permission to operate? Does the entire OR team have to come out and introduce themselves?

A resident and surgeon is alike two pilots flying a plan. The senior pilot is allowed to get up to take a leak, eat lunch, etc at some point during long flights. The junior pilot has the skills to handle things as well but defers to the senior pilot. They are a team.

You also never sue a resident (or you drop them quickly after their deposition) unless it's gross negligence on thier part. It's a gentlemen's agreement to not have a trainee start their career with a black mark on their record.

To those who say they don't want residents are medical students involved in their care, they have no idea how much they add to improved quality of care. It's an extra set of eyes and more people are hands on, paying attention to you. It's also selfish as hell on the people opting out. Your children and grandchildren won't have anyone to take care of them.
 
Tragic case all the way around. The resident angle is dirty pool by the attorney to cast a wider net for monetary gain. They can rope in the University of Iowa and the State. The standard of care does not require the resident to introduce themselves. It's courtesy but not required. The attending is the primary surgeon and thus carries responsibility. Does the entire OR team have to go seek permission to operate? Does the entire OR team have to come out and introduce themselves?

A resident and surgeon is alike two pilots flying a plan. The senior pilot is allowed to get up to take a leak, eat lunch, etc at some point during long flights. The junior pilot has the skills to handle things as well but defers to the senior pilot. They are a team.

You also never sue a resident (or you drop them quickly after their deposition) unless it's gross negligence on thier part. It's a gentlemen's agreement to not have a trainee start their career with a black mark on their record.

To those who say they don't want residents are medical students involved in their care, they have no idea how much they add to improved quality of care. It's an extra set of eyes and more people are hands on, paying attention to you. It's also selfish as hell on the people opting out. Your children and grandchildren won't have anyone to take care of them.

Unfortunate situation. No doubt. But besides lawyers - things like this bring out the arm chair QBs and yelling from the cheap seats like no other.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Urohawk
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT