Can you read? I'm blaming the lack of fan support on Fran. He killed fan-player outreach on many many levels and thats where it all started. Then with the continuing complete lack of tournament success (mixed wtih a double-shot of nepotism), the Fran fatigure kicked in FAST. Fans moved their time and money to the more likeable and successful women's program.
Also I really don't care that Dix or Sandfort aren't back. If I was a player and my coach left, I'd want to choose my next one too. And I sure as hell don't want Iowa blowing their NIL load on players who haven't won and don't want to be here, especially when a coach is trying to jump start a program his way with his players.
Well, you did take a little turn in the thread by making it about who was to blame for the lack of attendance.
I think there's certainly some truth to saying Fran could have had better public relations. A big step would have been to have gotten Margaret under control. Her behavior at Iowa games, high school games, press conferences, fund raisers, just can't happen. That fact that it continued, falls on Fran.
What complicates things is Margaret definitely had reason to be upset with Iowa fans. The shit Patrick took coming off of cancer. The shit Jack took after that tragedy. And the constant shit the family took for the ridiculous nepotism narrative. Get a life, people. It's really very sad.
Regardless of Margaret's right to be upset, the McCaffrey's needed to understand that part of their job was public relations, and how to keep certain things to themselves.
But beyond that, attendance issues with Iowa basketball spans back 3 coaches. Is Fran at fault for all that too?
Women's basketball is very relevant for you to have brought up. There is a strong correlation between a significant drop in men's attendance and a huge upswing in women's attendance during the same time period.
There are a few reasons for this, "product" being one of them that's actually overrated, or at least misinterpreted. There are different interpretations of product for different fans/consumers. For most of them, some mixture of most of these exists. But some are most interested in the "Hawkeye" aspect of it. Some are most interested in a winner. Some are most interested in the "basketball" aspect of it. Some are most interested in the gender part of it. Some were most interested in the Caitlin part of it. Some were most interested in the novelty/circus show (for lack of a better way of putting it) element, of certain things being done on a basketball court by a woman.
There are many elements of the product of a basketball game. For the people who are most interested in the "basketball" aspect of the product, women's basketball is never a better product than men's basketball. It isn't possible. So that's one distinction that needs to be made