ADVERTISEMENT

Federal Reserve Chairman Powell Warns of Unsustainable Fiscal Path as U.S. Debt Approaches $34 Trillion

Sharky1203

HR All-American
Silver Member
Sep 14, 2023
2,881
2,345
113
Federal Reserve Chairman Powell Warns of Unsustainable Fiscal Path as U.S. Debt Approaches $34 Trillion

Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell has taken the unusual step of addressing the growing concern over the United States’ national debt, which is nearing $34.2 trillion.

Powell’s comments came during a recent interview on CBS’ 60 Minutes, where he expressed his apprehension about the nation’s fiscal trajectory, labeling it as unsustainable.

All Time High Debt

Despite the avoidance of a predicted recession in 2023, increased government spending and reduced tax revenue have propelled the national debt to an all-time high.

The debt-to-GDP ratio, a measure of total public debt relative to economic growth, has risen from just over 100% in 2019 to over 120%.

Unsustainable Fiscal Path

Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell has voiced concerns about the United States’ long-term fiscal stability.

He has highlighted the unsustainable fiscal path that the nation is currently on, with the national debt rapidly approaching $34.2 trillion.

Debt to GDP

While the debt-to-GDP ratio has slightly decreased from its COVID-era peak of 133%, it remains at over 120%.

Fiscal Responsibility

Powell emphasized that the government’s debt is still growing at a rate surpassing economic growth, making it “past time, to get back to an adult conversation among elected officials about getting the federal government back on a sustainable fiscal path.”.

Delicate Balance

In his recent interview on CBS’ 60 Minutes, Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell navigated the delicate balance between the central bank’s non-partisan stance and his concerns about the nation’s fiscal policies.

Borrowing from Future Generations

Powell acknowledged that it is unusual for a Fed official to comment on fiscal policy but proceeded to criticize certain aspects of the government’s financial decisions.

He pointed out that lawmakers have essentially been “borrowing from future generations” due to the unsustainable nature of current policies.

Concerns Echoed by Financial Leaders

The concerns raised by Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell are not isolated in the world of finance.

Prominent figures like JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon have also sounded the alarm regarding the United States’ growing national debt.

Dimon recently warned that the nation is hurtling toward an economic “cliff” unless significant measures are taken to address the excessive debt burden.
He cautioned that failure to control the national debt could lead to a “rebellion” among foreign holders of U.S. government bonds.

Additionally, other influential figures on Wall Street, such as Mark Spitznagel and Ray Dalio, have long criticized the escalating federal deficits.
Spitznagel described the current situation as “the greatest credit bubble in human history,” emphasizing the inevitable consequences of such a financial environment.

Additionally, other influential figures on Wall Street, such as Mark Spitznagel and Ray Dalio, have long criticized the escalating federal deficits.

Spitznagel described the current situation as “the greatest credit bubble in human history,” emphasizing the inevitable consequences of such a financial environment.

Dalio, founder of the hedge fund giant Bridgewater Associates, has consistently warned of an impending debt crisis, particularly when the government resorts to borrowing to cover its annual debt servicing payments.

Amid the mounting concerns over the United States’ national debt, Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell offered a glimmer of hope.

Powell acknowledged the inherent strengths of the U.S. economy, describing it as dynamic, innovative, flexible, and adaptable.

He noted that these qualities have contributed to the nation’s outperformance compared to its global peers. Despite the challenges posed by the growing debt, Powell suggested that the United States has the capacity to rectify the situation, provided it acts promptly.

But he also added, “sooner is better than later.”

While concerns about the escalating national debt have resonated in financial circles, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen has maintained a different perspective.

Yellen has downplayed worries about the rising debt, asserting that the key metric she focuses on is net interest payments as a share of GDP.

According to Yellen, this metric remains “at a very reasonable level.” She defended the current state of the nation’s debt during a CNBC interview, emphasizing her view that the situation remains manageable.
 
Federal Reserve Chairman Powell Warns of Unsustainable Fiscal Path as U.S. Debt Approaches $34 Trillion

Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell has taken the unusual step of addressing the growing concern over the United States’ national debt, which is nearing $34.2 trillion.

Powell’s comments came during a recent interview on CBS’ 60 Minutes, where he expressed his apprehension about the nation’s fiscal trajectory, labeling it as unsustainable.

All Time High Debt

Despite the avoidance of a predicted recession in 2023, increased government spending and reduced tax revenue have propelled the national debt to an all-time high.

The debt-to-GDP ratio, a measure of total public debt relative to economic growth, has risen from just over 100% in 2019 to over 120%.

Unsustainable Fiscal Path

Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell has voiced concerns about the United States’ long-term fiscal stability.

He has highlighted the unsustainable fiscal path that the nation is currently on, with the national debt rapidly approaching $34.2 trillion.

Debt to GDP

While the debt-to-GDP ratio has slightly decreased from its COVID-era peak of 133%, it remains at over 120%.

Fiscal Responsibility

Powell emphasized that the government’s debt is still growing at a rate surpassing economic growth, making it “past time, to get back to an adult conversation among elected officials about getting the federal government back on a sustainable fiscal path.”.

Delicate Balance

In his recent interview on CBS’ 60 Minutes, Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell navigated the delicate balance between the central bank’s non-partisan stance and his concerns about the nation’s fiscal policies.

Borrowing from Future Generations

Powell acknowledged that it is unusual for a Fed official to comment on fiscal policy but proceeded to criticize certain aspects of the government’s financial decisions.

He pointed out that lawmakers have essentially been “borrowing from future generations” due to the unsustainable nature of current policies.

Concerns Echoed by Financial Leaders

The concerns raised by Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell are not isolated in the world of finance.

Prominent figures like JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon have also sounded the alarm regarding the United States’ growing national debt.

Dimon recently warned that the nation is hurtling toward an economic “cliff” unless significant measures are taken to address the excessive debt burden.
He cautioned that failure to control the national debt could lead to a “rebellion” among foreign holders of U.S. government bonds.

Additionally, other influential figures on Wall Street, such as Mark Spitznagel and Ray Dalio, have long criticized the escalating federal deficits.
Spitznagel described the current situation as “the greatest credit bubble in human history,” emphasizing the inevitable consequences of such a financial environment.

Additionally, other influential figures on Wall Street, such as Mark Spitznagel and Ray Dalio, have long criticized the escalating federal deficits.

Spitznagel described the current situation as “the greatest credit bubble in human history,” emphasizing the inevitable consequences of such a financial environment.

Dalio, founder of the hedge fund giant Bridgewater Associates, has consistently warned of an impending debt crisis, particularly when the government resorts to borrowing to cover its annual debt servicing payments.

Amid the mounting concerns over the United States’ national debt, Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell offered a glimmer of hope.

Powell acknowledged the inherent strengths of the U.S. economy, describing it as dynamic, innovative, flexible, and adaptable.

He noted that these qualities have contributed to the nation’s outperformance compared to its global peers. Despite the challenges posed by the growing debt, Powell suggested that the United States has the capacity to rectify the situation, provided it acts promptly.

But he also added, “sooner is better than later.”

While concerns about the escalating national debt have resonated in financial circles, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen has maintained a different perspective.

Yellen has downplayed worries about the rising debt, asserting that the key metric she focuses on is net interest payments as a share of GDP.

According to Yellen, this metric remains “at a very reasonable level.” She defended the current state of the nation’s debt during a CNBC interview, emphasizing her view that the situation remains manageable.
You mean all of these metrics are not good > https://www.usdebtclock.org/?
jo said he had this when he campaigned!
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Sharky1203
I’m disgusted by the spending habits of both parties. But my fiscal conservatism gets extra outraged at Republicans that scream about the deficit when they don’t hold the presidency and then elect a president in Trump who “loves” debt.
Meme Reaction GIF by Robert E Blackmon


I'll also add we need to reduce spending and raise taxes some.
 
What tax increase percentage would work for various income levels to get enough revenue for your plan to work?
For starters lets implement the 1990 (Pay Go) budget agreement that raised taxes and reduced spending.
 
Baseline spending is up over $2T in the last 10 years. Tax revenue was down slightly in 2020, and a lot more in 2023, but up year over year for every other year. We have a spending problem, not a revenue problem.
20210114-borrowing-increased-under-trump-despite-promise-to-repay-national-debt-small.png
 
For starters lets implement the 1990 (Pay Go) budget agreement that raised taxes and reduced spending.
OK. What tax % increase for each bracket level would that be, and how much revenue would be raised if there's no laffer curve effect?
 
I’m disgusted by the spending habits of both parties. But my fiscal conservatism gets extra outraged at Republicans that scream about the deficit when they don’t hold the presidency and then elect a president in Trump who “loves” debt.

I agree, but that really has nothing to do with the article in OP.
 
OK. What tax % increase for each bracket level would that be, and how much revenue would be raised if there's no laffer curve effect?
Google is your friend on this one. Try Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 or I'm ok with even going back to American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 standards. These are starting points. I know that people hate paying taxes, but it's needed. That said, the other part of the deal is government PAY GO and a FWA review to eliminate or reduce spending.
 
Google is your friend on this one. Try Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 or I'm ok with even going back to American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 standards. These are starting points. I know that people hate paying taxes, but it's needed. That said, the other part of the deal is government PAY GO and a FWA review to eliminate or reduce spending.
Yeah, no. You said that's what you would do, so you should explain it. You can't.
 
Yeah, no. You said that's what you would do, so you should explain it. You can't.
Holy crap you are on here all day and can't google two items that would lay out the brackets and then some?
Keep googling witch hunt article then I guess.
 
We will need adults to solve the problem.

Which means we are screwed until the leadership of the GOP changes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fsu1jreed
Spending freeze would be a nice place to start. If one program needs more money they can find another program to cut.

Elections should be about how the money is spent. Elections should not be about printing money and who to give it away to.
 
Baseline spending is up over $2T in the last 10 years. Tax revenue was down slightly in 2020, and a lot more in 2023, but up year over year for every other year. We have a spending problem, not a revenue problem.

JFC. This is the most ridiculous argument you MAGA weirdos make. Decades of weak revenue stream have helped bankrupt this country. How in the fcvk can expect anyone to take you seriously when the country is in financial trouble, and you say we have don't have a revenue problem?

You have a real problem dude. It's called the inability to accept reality.
 
Holy crap you are on here all day and can't google two items that would lay out the brackets and then some?
Keep googling witch hunt article then I guess.
I don't think raising rates on the rich is going to put much of a dent in the deficit. Since the top 5% pay 70% of federal income taxes, you'd essentially have to double their rate to make a dent in the annual deficit. Of course that would cause an immediate economic growth decline and get the opposite of the intended effect. It's been tried in various forms. Google it.
 
In Sat Wall St Journal editorial about how unserious Trump is on debt they point out how 40 % of fed spending is social security, Medicare and Medicaid

Much of the increase in fed spending is on these programs as our population ages. Only going to get worse.

Neither party is serious about addressing it. Haley got hammered by Trump when she did.

Raising retirement age for folks in their 20s would help.
Cutting milllionaires off benefits also
Gotta start somewhere.
Rational billionaires like Buffett and Simon are pleading for tax increases on their class also.
Everyone needs to sacrifice to tackle this issue.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT