I'm no content expert, but I think that some their reasoning to not "have it available" for hard-copy purchase is rights to the content that is in the movie. Rights contracts were the reason that the movie was unavailable for about a year in the 1st place. Those rights to re-broadcast are not granted forever and they likely needed to re-negotiate the right to sell the Olympic/NBC/IPTV footage on their streaming service, and likely specific to the streaming service. Were they to sell hard copies they would likely have to negotiate different terms with the owners of the footage which would probably be more expensive for Flo.
The other argument is that the younger generation of folks don't keep hard copies of anything. Magazines, movies, music, et. al. are all streamed these days and it's likely to trend even more in that direction. Flo knows this and by keeping it streaming-only they can make sure you keep subscribing to watch their content. The old soul in me does not like this, as I like to "have" my stuff and keep it, but many (or most at this point) would rather just subscribe to the digital right to watch (listen, read, etc.) and be dependent on "the network" to always have it available.
If you dig hard enough, you'll find software that allows you to rip it from the internet for "personal use only" which is fundamentally no different than putting a tape in the VCR to record for later viewing of your own.
I have not had enough time to re-watch the entire documentary yet, but the bonus content is great. I'm a big fan, both of #Terry and of the Flo guys.
PM
You don't point the camera at anything you don't have the rights to, that includes somebody's likeness and image without some sort of ND agreement or contract. You don't turn the mic to anything you don't own. A lot of times you can simply get written permission and you're covered.
I love Flo's original content and i think they do a helluva a job, but my point is if they want to take it up a notch then they need to figure some things out. I didn't know the specifics behind "Terry" so thank you for sharing. But those are fundamental filming mistakes that could have been avoided in pre production/ production/ post production before releasing the film. You simply don't release anything without being 100% sure that you're ready to go. So that was an absolutely huge mistake on Flo's behalf and one that should have never occurred.
I haven't been able to view "Terry" yet since it was down during my whole subscription, so I'm not sure to what extent they were showing licensed content, but again, they should have edited it in a way it could fall under "fair use"
Your other point about digital media is valid, but there is a big problem that a lot of people don't know about or consider. As you mentioned, flo and other media outlets would have to re-negotiate their lease on certain content, which is true, but the same goes for all the big time streaming/ downloading services. As of a month ago Apple was heavily criticized for purchased movies "disappearing" as they may lose the distribution rights with select studios. I can see this becoming a bigger problem over time especially with the likes of Apple, Amazon, Vudu, Moviesanywhere, etc. Then you throw in the cursed problem of DMR and your stuck containing your precious copy to one single format.
That is why a physical copy of anything will always be around, because it is the only way to guarantee whatever it is you've purchased, stays in your hands.
And I remember the good ol' days when Safari could rip anything streaming in the browser...ahhh
I work in the film/ tv industry and we put ourselves through hell and back. It's truly an awful career (most of the time). With that being said, when I see a great piece I want it to be shown everywhere in every format, because that's what those filmmakers deserve. My apologies for the long response, guys, but this has been a good topic. Thank you!