ADVERTISEMENT

Fran vs Tom Davis

Did you forget Gatens (alford recruit, legacy thank lute olson) and Marble (Lickliter recruit, legacy thank Raveling)?
Unfortunately Lil Lick didn't stick around for Fran, but I noticed he was re-incarnated as Lil' Hoilberg.


One difference between Davis and Fran eras is the Big10 used to be best basketball conference. Now it's a middle of the pack.. The Big10 Brand has been hurt by adding three historically bad programs in Nebraska, Penn State, Rutgers. but that has helped Fran's record.
The Big Ten is the second best conference in the country this year according to the NET. The Big Ten has also been the best conf in basketball two of the last four years. So your final point doesn’t really have much to stand on.
 
I always thought Davis got a raw deal, however at the time I understood the frustration as well. There was also a shiny Steve Alford waiting in the wings we all thought would take us to the next level (regular sweet 16s).

That was before I knew how bad it could get.

That's why Fran gets forgiven for ONLY making the tournament.

I realize as I'm older that I value going into games knowing we have a chance to win. It makes watching much more fun. We always have a chance with Fran. with Lickliter, we went for long stretches without hope, just waiting until we met the next really bad team that MAYBE we could beat. That was miserable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: intrepodor
You did read that I wrote "iirc" and "10-0 or so" trying to remember somewhat off the top of my head.

Just giving ya a little crap since the number of NCAA appearances (nine) was actually in the OP and somewhat common knowledge among us older fans. When you went with the tried and true ‘undefeated in opening round games’, I thought you were one of us older guys.
 
Yes, and Fran will have 5 NBA guys when Kris graduates over the last 4 years. With 2 wins to show for them in the tourney?
And no regular season championships and no Sweet Sixteen's to show for it.
Jon Gries Dr Roberts GIF by DREAM CORP LLC
 
We are now nearing the end of Year 13 of Fran McCaffery, meaning he has reached the Tom Davis retirement year. As many remember, the Iowa fan base was growing fatigued with the lack of winning under Davis, but a quick comparison shows that Davis has actually had more success than Fran over his 13 year stint.

Big Ten Record:
Davis: 125-105 (54%)
McCaffery: 126-118 (52%)

Overall Record:
Davis: 269-140 (66%)
McCaffery: 257-173 (60%)

NCAA Appearances:
Davis: 9
McCaffery: 8 (Counting 2020 and 2023) (Also counting First Four appearance in 2014)

Tournament Wins:
Davis: 13
McCaffery: 5 (Counting 1 for 2020) (2023 TBD)

You can argue that Davis started in a much better spot, and his most successful season was his first season with players he didn't recruit. If you remove the first 2 years of each coaching stint, the numbers are a little closer. But it does seem like Fran doesn't really have much job pressure right now, even though the team has largely failed to deliver, especially in March.

Looking ahead, we are clearly in a rebuilding mode, as Murray is likely gone to the draft and Connor and Rebraca are graduating. I don't expect this team to be a tournament team next year.

So how long of a leash does Fran have? This year would be the 5th straight year of making the tournament (counting 2020), which is impressive and hasn't been done since 1979-1983. But that streak has so far only translated into 2 tournament wins.
Just adding a little information for context. Lute Olsen - 9 years.


Big Ten Record:
Davis: 125-105 (54%)
McCaffery: 126-118 (52%)
Lute Olsen 91-71 (56%)

Overall Record:
Davis: 269-140 (66%)
McCaffery: 257-173 (60%)
Lute Olsen 167-91 (65%)

NCAA Appearances:
Davis: 9
McCaffery: 8 (Counting 2020 and 2023) (Also counting First Four appearance in 2014)
Olsen 5

Tournament Wins:
Davis: 13
McCaffery: 5 (Counting 1 for 2020) (2023 TBD)
Olsen 7


I don't think that anyone would argue that Lute wasn't better than Dr Tom or Fran. But for the magical 1980 FF run, are the records that much different?

Heck, you can go back to Ralph Miller who left Iowa on 1970 (53 years ago!) - probably had the best results but it was back when it was almost impossible to get into the Dance.

It's Iowa basketball.

Final note - did Dr Tom lose guys to the NBA (Ricki Davis maybe the only one?). Imagine this years team with Keagan?
 
Just adding a little information for context. Lute Olsen - 9 years.


Big Ten Record:
Davis: 125-105 (54%)
McCaffery: 126-118 (52%)
Lute Olsen 91-71 (56%)

Overall Record:
Davis: 269-140 (66%)
McCaffery: 257-173 (60%)
Lute Olsen 167-91 (65%)

NCAA Appearances:
Davis: 9
McCaffery: 8 (Counting 2020 and 2023) (Also counting First Four appearance in 2014)
Olsen 5

Tournament Wins:
Davis: 13
McCaffery: 5 (Counting 1 for 2020) (2023 TBD)
Olsen 7


I don't think that anyone would argue that Lute wasn't better than Dr Tom or Fran. But for the magical 1980 FF run, are the records that much different?

Heck, you can go back to Ralph Miller who left Iowa on 1970 (53 years ago!) - probably had the best results but it was back when it was almost impossible to get into the Dance.

It's Iowa basketball.

Final note - did Dr Tom lose guys to the NBA (Ricki Davis maybe the only one?). Imagine this years team with Keagan?

Another note: The NCAA tournament consisted of 32 teams in Lute’s first season and 52 teams by his last season at Iowa. The tournament expanded to 64 teams in 1985.
 
Just adding a little information for context. Lute Olsen - 9 years.


Big Ten Record:
Davis: 125-105 (54%)
McCaffery: 126-118 (52%)
Lute Olsen 91-71 (56%)

Overall Record:
Davis: 269-140 (66%)
McCaffery: 257-173 (60%)
Lute Olsen 167-91 (65%)

NCAA Appearances:
Davis: 9
McCaffery: 8 (Counting 2020 and 2023) (Also counting First Four appearance in 2014)
Olsen 5

Tournament Wins:
Davis: 13
McCaffery: 5 (Counting 1 for 2020) (2023 TBD)
Olsen 7


I don't think that anyone would argue that Lute wasn't better than Dr Tom or Fran. But for the magical 1980 FF run, are the records that much different?

Heck, you can go back to Ralph Miller who left Iowa on 1970 (53 years ago!) - probably had the best results but it was back when it was almost impossible to get into the Dance.

It's Iowa basketball.

Final note - did Dr Tom lose guys to the NBA (Ricki Davis maybe the only one?). Imagine this years team with Keagan?
Davis didn't lose many guys to the nba but he lost some of his most talented guys for various reasons.

Thompson, Street, Settles, Davis.

Not getting Lafrentz was probably as big of a factor as any in why Davis was let go though.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Hawk_4shur
After Ravelings recruits were gone.
Davis 89-87 in conference play the next 10 years.
6 NCAA appearances.

After Frans first 3 years.
105-85 in conference play the next 10 years.
7 NCAA appearances. Counting 2020 and this year.

Davis was 25-47 in conference play at Stanford.
Davis was 25-47 in conference play at Drake.

Other than last year, Frans teams have been pathetic in BTT.
Davis was 0-2.

Stanford basketball greatly improved under Mike Montgomery.
 
I'm just saying it's not an automatic that a person will flee to a "blue blood" in this new era.

Also, if Iowa can find it's version of Matt Painter, someone with strong Hawkeye ties, all the better.

What former players are starting to make waves in the coaching ranks right now? Are there any?
I wish Ryan Bowen would have stuck around. Was he back helping the coaching staff for maybe a year? I think he would have had some connections having played in the NBA for as long as he did.
Wonder where he is at these days.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LaQuintaHawkeye
No comparison. Tom Davis was a gentleman, a genuinely humble person and a wonderful coach. His teams played with consistent fire and intensity. Definitely my all-time favorite Iowa coach. He had personality to burn and a ready smile for a player. I loved the way his teams played. Fran is a very average coach. He is whiney, set in his ways, and embarrasses his team with his ridiculous and juvenile behavior. The players loved Tom Davis. Some of Iowa's players love Fran. Some are just hanging in there, I believe.
'Some are just hanging in there?' You believe? Beyond silly. Fran is operating in the portal, NIL era. Of course we're going to lose people.

I found Davis basketball unwatchable and actually did tune out for several years. Rotating players in and out every four or five minutes was insane. (I've always wondered what Armstrong and the rest of that Year One team thought of that strategy.) The full court press was easily shredded by good teams. A typical game v the good Big Ten teams went like this: The opponent goes up by 15-20, Iowa continues pressing, the opponent loses interest, and Iowa loses by eight. (I did like the way Davis teams rebounded, though.)

Don't know about the doctor's humility, personality. I'll defer to you. (Btw, I've always wondered about guys you use the 'Dr.' when it's a PhD in education.) Somehow he didn't notice the point-shaving at BC or the way Pearl was recruiting Deon Thomas, except, it has been reported, to tell Pearl that his job depended on getting Thomas. The doctor himself was widely considered a lazy recruiter. Could, should he have gotten LaFrentz? His father loved Roy Williams and Kansas, so maybe he was ungettable. But maybe the reasons he loved KU were its style of play and the fact that Williams was relentless in recruiting his son. Read Williams' memoir for that story.

I'll take Fran basketball in a heartbeat. Fast and entertaining. Re/ defense, don't teams score more when given more opportunities against a fast-paced team like Iowa. Would you rather have Wisconsin basketball? And following the Lickliter disaster, I'm sure that Fran figured, rightly, that the way to attract fans and talent was to emphasize offense over defense.
 
It all depends on what you expect Iowa basketball to be. I would argue that we should never expect to win a big ten title, but should be in the top half every year and maybe the top 3 every 3-4 years.

The main drawback to Fran so far as been the tournament performance. I think most of the fan base expects the team to make the tournament most years, which he has done, but I think they expect a tournament win almost every time, and considering we are almost always favored in the first game, thats not much to ask. But the fan base also expects a deeper tournament run every 4-5 years, and we obviously haven't had that in over 20 years now.
 
The teams under Davis and Fran are the ceiling of Iowa basketball. The only way you start winning more is to hire an up and coming coach with great recruiting connections.

He might come in and assemble a team that wins 25+ games and makes it past the Sweet 16. I also think he then bolts for a blue blood afterwards.

You are just as likely, probably more likely, to hire someone like Lickliter that ends up not winning or a guy like Alford who has character flaws.

Fran is doing fine. I want more post-season success but I understand it's often the luck of the draw. Last year's loss was really the only one in the tourney that I felt was bad under Fran. Richmond was not a good basketball team.
I think Fran's ceiling would be higher if his teams would simply start playing reasonable defense. Is even middle of the pack in the BIg 10 too much to ask? Not this dead last stuff.
 
After Ravelings recruits were gone.
Davis 89-87 in conference play the next 10 years.
6 NCAA appearances.

After Frans first 3 years.
105-85 in conference play the next 10 years.
7 NCAA appearances. Counting 2020 and this year.

Davis was 25-47 in conference play at Stanford.
Davis was 25-47 in conference play at Drake.

Other than last year, Frans teams have been pathetic in BTT.
Davis was 0-2.

Stanford basketball greatly improved under Mike Montgomery.
Reality check for those with memories of Dr Tom's success, skewed by his first year with George's players.

Truth is that it is hard to have elite teams at Iowa, which has some significant disadvantages compared to about half of the other teams in the B1G. Lute took Iowa to a Final Four, but as noted, his record was barely better than Fran or Dr Tom.
 
Reality check for those with memories of Dr Tom's success, skewed by his first year with George's players.

Truth is that it is hard to have elite teams at Iowa, which has some significant disadvantages compared to about half of the other teams in the B1G. Lute took Iowa to a Final Four, but as noted, his record was barely better than Fran or Dr Tom.
Lute also inherited a bad team.
 
After Ravelings recruits were gone.
Davis 89-87 in conference play the next 10 years.
6 NCAA appearances.

After Frans first 3 years.
105-85 in conference play the next 10 years.
7 NCAA appearances. Counting 2020 and this year.

Davis was 25-47 in conference play at Stanford.
Davis was 25-47 in conference play at Drake.

Other than last year, Frans teams have been pathetic in BTT.
Davis was 0-2.

Stanford basketball greatly improved under Mike Montgomery.
You conveniently left out his record at Lafayette and Boston College. 100-47 at BC with an elite 8 appearance and 117-46 or something like that at Lafayette. And his record at Drake was misleading as he was the 1 who set that team up for their Valley title in 07-08.
 
It all depends on what you expect Iowa basketball to be. I would argue that we should never expect to win a big ten title, but should be in the top half every year and maybe the top 3 every 3-4 years.

The main drawback to Fran so far as been the tournament performance. I think most of the fan base expects the team to make the tournament most years, which he has done, but I think they expect a tournament win almost every time, and considering we are almost always favored in the first game, thats not much to ask. But the fan base also expects a deeper tournament run every 4-5 years, and we obviously haven't had that in over 20 years now.

2014 (11) Iowa vs (11) Tennessee: Iowa -2.5
2015 (7) Iowa vs (10) Davidson: Iowa -1
2016 (7) Iowa vs (10) Temple: Iowa -7
2019 (7) Cincy vs (10) Iowa: Cincy -4.5
2020 No NCAA Tournament
2021 (2) Iowa vs (15) GCU: Iowa 14
2022 (5) Iowa vs (12) Richmond: Iowa -10.5


Second round:
2015 (7) Iowa vs (2) Gonzaga: Zags -5
2016 (7) Iowa vs (2) Villanova: Nova -6.5
2019 (10) Iowa vs (2) Tennessee: Tenn -8
2021 (2) Iowa vs (7) Oregon: Iowa -5.5
 
Yes, and Fran will have 5 NBA guys when Kris graduates over the last 4 years. With 2 wins to show for them in the tourney?
All seven of those players were on the same team, and Marble, Horton and Armstrong were all sophs for Davis's first year, so he had three years with that core. Just a slight difference, don't you think?
 
This idea that's it's just a given that all Fran's kids get scholarships and PT is freaking outrageous to me.

Why on earth should fans just accept that? It's crazy.
Maybe because they are all highly ranked and regarded players? That might be one factor.

And re Connor McCaffrey: he was just selected third team All Conference. But he sucks, right? He only plays because he's the coaches son.

As I've said a few times before, get a frigging clue.
 
All seven of those players were on the same team, and Marble, Horton and Armstrong were all sophs for Davis's first year, so he had three years with that core. Just a slight difference, don't you think?
Cook, Garza and Weiskamp all played on the same team as well. Marble and Horton were great Hawks but did nothing in the NBA. Luka has had by far the most decorated college career of any of those guys. Obviously BJ and Gamble had successful pro careers. Lohaus as well, though Lohaus developed 100% under Dr Toms system. Keegan is on his way to making the all rookie team and will probably have a better pro career than any of Dr Toms guys.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: jimbob22
Cook, Garza and Weiskamp all played on the same team as well. Marble and Horton were great Hawks but did nothing in the NBA. Luka has had by far the most decorated college career of any of those guys. Obviously BJ and Gamble had successful pro careers. Lohaus as well, though Lohaus developed 100% under Dr Toms system. Keegan is on his way to making the all rookie team and will probably have a better pro career than any of Dr Toms guys.
So how are Cook, Garza and Weiskamp doing in the NBA? Davis had SEVEN, I repeat SEVEN NBA players on one team. Don't get me wrong, I loved Davis and was very irate when he was let go, but comparing any of Fran's teams to that one is ridiculous.

And saying that Luka was that good also means that Fran's coaching is excellent, because Garza was a project. (waiting to hear how that was all due to Frank Garza in 5...4...3...2...)

Bringing up Keegan is also a kudo to Fran, as the Murray's were overlooked by everyone but Fran.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EagleHawk
I’m
'Some are just hanging in there?' You believe? Beyond silly. Fran is operating in the portal, NIL era. Of course we're going to lose people.

I found Davis basketball unwatchable and actually did tune out for several years. Rotating players in and out every four or five minutes was insane. (I've always wondered what Armstrong and the rest of that Year One team thought of that strategy.) The full court press was easily shredded by good teams. A typical game v the good Big Ten teams went like this: The opponent goes up by 15-20, Iowa continues pressing, the opponent loses interest, and Iowa loses by eight. (I did like the way Davis teams rebounded, though.)

Don't know about the doctor's humility, personality. I'll defer to you. (Btw, I've always wondered about guys you use the 'Dr.' when it's a PhD in education.) Somehow he didn't notice the point-shaving at BC or the way Pearl was recruiting Deon Thomas, except, it has been reported, to tell Pearl that his job depended on getting Thomas. The doctor himself was widely considered a lazy recruiter. Could, should he have gotten LaFrentz? His father loved Roy Williams and Kansas, so maybe he was ungettable. But maybe the reasons he loved KU were its style of play and the fact that Williams was relentless in recruiting his son. Read Williams' memoir for that story.

I'll take Fran basketball in a heartbeat. Fast and entertaining. Re/ defense, don't teams score more when given more opportunities against a fast-paced team like Iowa. Would you rather have Wisconsin basketball? And following the Lickliter disaster, I'm sure that Fran figured, rightly, that the way to attract fans and talent was to emphasize offense over defense.
 
So how are Cook, Garza and Weiskamp doing in the NBA? Davis had SEVEN, I repeat SEVEN NBA players on one team. Don't get me wrong, I loved Davis and was very irate when he was let go, but comparing any of Fran's teams to that one is ridiculous.

And saying that Luka was that good also means that Fran's coaching is excellent, because Garza was a project. (waiting to hear how that was all due to Frank Garza in 5...4...3...2...)

Bringing up Keegan is also a kudo to Fran, as the Murray's were overlooked by everyone but Fran.
Again, 3 of those guys actually played in the NBA. Hortons career was 45 games and and Marble played 24. Cup of coffee for Jones and I’d have to look it up whoever was the 7th guy. Murray will also be a 1st rounder so Fran actually had 2 1st round picks in the Murray bros plus Garza on the same team. I’m not a Fran hater at all but let’s not pretend he hasn’t had star players, because he has.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: jimbob22
So how are Cook, Garza and Weiskamp doing in the NBA? Davis had SEVEN, I repeat SEVEN NBA players on one team. Don't get me wrong, I loved Davis and was very irate when he was let go, but comparing any of Fran's teams to that one is ridiculous.

And saying that Luka was that good also means that Fran's coaching is excellent, because Garza was a project. (waiting to hear how that was all due to Frank Garza in 5...4...3...2...)

Bringing up Keegan is also a kudo to Fran, as the Murray's were overlooked by everyone but Fran.
In no way shape or form was Garza a project. That is completely false.

He was a 4* recruit with an offer from Rick Patino.

Hes the most naturally talented scorer to come to Iowa in a long time.

He just needed to get in slightly better shape and get Tyler Cook out of the lane.
 
So how are Cook, Garza and Weiskamp doing in the NBA? Davis had SEVEN, I repeat SEVEN NBA players on one team. Don't get me wrong, I loved Davis and was very irate when he was let go, but comparing any of Fran's teams to that one is ridiculous.

And saying that Luka was that good also means that Fran's coaching is excellent, because Garza was a project. (waiting to hear how that was all due to Frank Garza in 5...4...3...2...)

Bringing up Keegan is also a kudo to Fran, as the Murray's were overlooked by everyone but Fran.
Need to read carefully. Dr Tom inherited all 7 of the players on that team from George Raveling. Although I think maybe Ryan Bowen is being overlooked, who had a long solid NBA career.

Dr Tom was basically a .500 coach his last 10 years at Iowa, and there were some off court issues that probably contributed to his release.
 
Lute also inherited a bad team.
Overall, I think Lute was the best coach at Iowa in the 45 years I have followed them, but he did not exactly have a series of elite teams. Iowa is not a hotbed of lots of top recruits, and doesn't have the history or budget of some of the other athletic dept's in the B1G. I think the best BB coaches at Iowa were before I started following the Hawks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: farmera111
Overall, I think Lute was the best coach at Iowa in the 45 years I have followed them, but he did not exactly have a series of elite teams. Iowa is not a hotbed of lots of top recruits, and doesn't have the history or budget of some of the other athletic dept's in the B1G. I think the best BB coaches at Iowa were before I started following the Hawks.
Agreed. Lute is almost certainly the best recruiter/coach Iowa has had in my lifetime and it took going to Arizona for him to make that leap to elite level.
 
2014 (11) Iowa vs (11) Tennessee: Iowa -2.5
2015 (7) Iowa vs (10) Davidson: Iowa -1
2016 (7) Iowa vs (10) Temple: Iowa -7
2019 (7) Cincy vs (10) Iowa: Cincy -4.5
2020 No NCAA Tournament
2021 (2) Iowa vs (15) GCU: Iowa 14
2022 (5) Iowa vs (12) Richmond: Iowa -10.5


Second round:
2015 (7) Iowa vs (2) Gonzaga: Zags -5
2016 (7) Iowa vs (2) Villanova: Nova -6.5
2019 (10) Iowa vs (2) Tennessee: Tenn -8
2021 (2) Iowa vs (7) Oregon: Iowa -5.5
Four second round games and all four games double digit deficits at halftime.
 
You conveniently left out his record at Lafayette and Boston College. 100-47 at BC with an elite 8 appearance and 117-46 or something like that at Lafayette. And his record at Drake was misleading as he was the 1 who set that team up for their Valley title in 07-08.
I knew someone would take the bait and bring BC up. Congratulations. The set up argument for 2007-08 season is ridiculous. Drake lost 4 starters off of 06-07 team. 2008 MVC MVP did Emmeneker did not start one game the previous season. Leonard Houston started zero. Davis set the 2007 team up for success and completely failed.
 
I knew someone would take the bait and bring BC up. Congratulations. The set up argument for 2007-08 season is ridiculous. Drake lost 4 starters off of 06-07 team. 2008 MVC MVP did Emmeneker did not start one game the previous season. Leonard Houston started zero. Davis set the 2007 team up for success and completely failed.
Take what bait? You threw out his failure at Stanford while not talking about his great winning % at BC and Lafayette. You’re ridiculous.
 
Just giving ya a little crap since the number of NCAA appearances (nine) was actually in the OP and somewhat common knowledge among us older fans. When you went with the tried and true ‘undefeated in opening round games’, I thought you were one of us older guys.
Oh I am old enough to remember watching bits and pieces on TV of Iowa in the 1950's Rose Bowls.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT